• Welcome to DOSBODS

     

    DOSBODS is free of any advertising.

    Ads are annoying, and - increasingly - advertising companies limit free speech online. DOSBODS Forums are completely free to use. Please create a free account to be able to access all the features of the DOSBODS community. It only takes 20 seconds!

     

Sign in to follow this  
I'll Handle it

Zuckbook shadow banning

Recommended Posts

I had a facebook page on which I shared mainly short videos snatched from Twitter. The Normal enrichment outrage porn and tales of dindu's chimping out. Nothing graphic and no posts were deleted by Facebook (as far I know). No personal bans. I quickly got a following of 3000 people but some of my videos were getting up to a million views. Suddenly and literally overnight, my posts were only being seen by one or two people. The page is effectively dead.

I shouldn't be surprised but nonetheless it's extremely depressing. The personal msg's I received were very encouraging but there's no point in starting over. 

Some of the young people I work with are gobbling up Netflix shite such as When They See Us and as a result they appear to be utterly lost.

Any attempt to rescue them from their white guilt is being brutally purged. I'll leave this AIU video here as it's important work imo.
 


 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

there's a rumour that Trump is considering signing an executive order which would stop shadow banning (my interpretation at least), but unless you are a US citizen you may not get protection. It would be interesting if you had US subscribers that complained though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So you either have a keyword in the audio or description that has offended the zuck. Best of luck having a video recipe for faggots.

Or someone has posted a word in the comments that zuck thinks is verbotten. Malicious people are apparently doing this on various social media sites now in order to get people banned.

Makes notes of it all as I can see these tech firms being forced to pay compensation in the coming years. That or they will have had us all rounded up by then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, I'll Handle it said:

I had a facebook page on which I shared mainly short videos snatched from Twitter. The Normal enrichment outrage porn and tales of dindu's chimping out. Nothing graphic and no posts were deleted by Facebook (as far I know). No personal bans. I quickly got a following of 3000 people but some of my videos were getting up to a million views. Suddenly and literally overnight, my posts were only being seen by one or two people. The page is effectively dead.

I shouldn't be surprised but nonetheless it's extremely depressing. The personal msg's I received were very encouraging but there's no point in starting over. 

Some of the young people I work with are gobbling up Netflix shite such as When They See Us and as a result they appear to be utterly lost.

Any attempt to rescue them from their white guilt is being brutally purged. I'll leave this AIU video here as it's important work imo.
 


 

So the DNA of the chap in jail who confessed in 2002 or whenever was found in the victim (allegedly because he found the already-raped and beaten victim and raped her too - jeez!). What about the DNA of the Central Park 5 themselves? Was that not found? I'm puzzled.

I remember coming across this case a few months ago and the ferocious contradictory views attached to it.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, DocH said:

So the DNA of the chap in jail who confessed in 2002 or whenever was found in the victim (allegedly because he found the already-raped and beaten victim and raped her too - jeez!). What about the DNA of the Central Park 5 themselves? Was that not found? I'm puzzled.

I remember coming across this case a few months ago and the ferocious contradictory views attached to it.

 

 

AIU is going to cover that in future videos, unless... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DocH said:

So the DNA of the chap in jail who confessed in 2002 or whenever was found in the victim (allegedly because he found the already-raped and beaten victim and raped her too - jeez!). What about the DNA of the Central Park 5 themselves? Was that not found? I'm puzzled.

I remember coming across this case a few months ago and the ferocious contradictory views attached to it.

 

 

I think it`s mostly the fact they all gave the same account when they were individually interrogated and allegedly coheresd into confessions,yet those interviews are on YT and it`s allegedly plain to see there was no dodgy goings on 

As for DNA testing was it about in 1990 i know the linnet white case in Cardiff around the same time was solved a decade or more later due to DNA that was found that had been  protected for over a decade under layers of paint in the flat it was only the advances in DNA testing that solved this crime i think the DNA of the guy now in jail in the US was similarly found on a sock taken from the crime scene , but only tested in 2002 

Five people giving the same account and confessing to something that`s going to see them jailed for decades or longer and they were innocent seems very unlikely to me 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.