Jump to content
DOSBODS
  • Welcome to DOSBODS

     

    DOSBODS is free of any advertising.

    Ads are annoying, and - increasingly - advertising companies limit free speech online. DOSBODS Forums are completely free to use. Please create a free account to be able to access all the features of the DOSBODS community. It only takes 20 seconds!

     

IGNORED

Credit deflation and the reflation cycle to come (part 2)


spunko

Recommended Posts

Democorruptcy
22 minutes ago, Harley said:

spacer.png

IMO this is a macro thread ("Credit deflation and the reflation cycle to come").  I tried talking macro but some people didn't bother to understand and were rude about it and/or just wanted stock tips rather than fish in the other threads, posting glib responses to thought out and invested posts.  You could just put most on ignore, except Sancho, CattleProd, DB and co who continue to do well.  A bit of off-topic is reasonable and to be expected but rather than say too much BTC (which there is), etc I've noticed a reduction in macro, thus upsetting the balance.  But TBF "macro" is a bit nebulous and BTC has it's place in the correct context (say in discussing asset allocations and trends) but deep dives, well we have other threads for such things.  A bit of a balanced judgement call.  I for one promise to refocus on macro and post less!

PS:  Not referring your your post but in this context I'm fearful I'm beginning to notice a general change of tone across many threads, maybe mirroring the general angst out there among the population.

PPS: Home made tuna pizza tonight, but I'll leave it there!

When DB mentioned bitcoin a while back I posted a table of firms that had done well because of their exposure to it, thinking what might happen if a bigger firm went in. I didn't make the post I intended earlier because I couldn't be bothered after having to scroll through so much about bitcoin. Now you have drawn me back in with a quote... next Thursday 18th a few thread darlings BP, RDSB, IMB, GSK all go ex-dividend. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 35.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
21 minutes ago, wherebee said:

how do you stop the tuna burning?  It seems to go before the cheese melts enough.

and yes, it is off topic.

Put the tuna on before the cheese.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, arrow said:

And they’ll probably need that caution in spades.

Got it - buy spades.

LON:TPK

 

On a serious note, does anyone know of any miner services sectors, similar to the oil services sector, that we could look at? I'm thinking heavy plant, but also reagents etc for refining, conveyors, etc etc?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Hardhat said:

Got it - buy spades.

LON:TPK

 

On a serious note, does anyone know of any miner services sectors, similar to the oil services sector, that we could look at? I'm thinking heavy plant, but also reagents etc for refining, conveyors, etc etc?

Check out Superior Industries

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, arrow said:

The main stream media, Telegraph, is now writing about the coming commodity supercycle, as promoted by Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan. It talks about major fiscal sepnding, infrastructure investments, commodities demand. Though, instead of crude supply no longer being able to cope with demand, the author does mistakenly believe that "oil prices have tripled since last year’s nadir with Brent crude close to $60 per barrel as demand hopes rise and Opec holds back supply".

 

"Is the world on the brink of a metals supercycle?
Major infrastructure spending and the drive for green cars and appliances could fuel a years-long boom in demand for commodities
Jetting into the richest country in the world can feel a little like arriving in the past. Visitors to America are often greeted by outdated airports, crumbling roads and poor public transport as its infrastructure is leapfrogged by big investment elsewhere.
“American infrastructure absolutely has fallen behind the stuff being built in China and certainly in the Middle East, and it’s time the West caught up, frankly,” says John Meyer, mining analyst at SP Angel. “Governments have not wanted to spend public money on infrastructure… it’s as if the West was waiting for an excuse to do this sort of thing.”
The need to upgrade the country’s ageing infrastructure has become a rare common goal on both sides of the aisle in Washington. Joe Biden has set his sights on an investment spree that he hopes can simultaneously upgrade America, fuel the recovery and drive his green ambitions. But that will need metals, and a lot of them.
Meyer and top Wall Street analysts believe a global post-Covid investment boom will herald a new commodities “supercycle” – a multi-year and even decade-long surge in prices that is well above normal trends. Others remain sceptical, believing 2021 will prove to be the peak.
The commodities market ended 2020 on the front foot after the outlook was brightened by vaccine rollouts and government stimulus nearing $20 trillion globally. China, a key driver of demand, has bounced back from Covid, and was the only major economy to grow in 2020.
The S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index – a broad measure of metals such as copper and iron ore – climbed by almost 30pc last year, hitting its highest level since 2011.
Copper gained 25pc and steel-making ingredient iron ore jumped almost 70pc. Meanwhile, oil prices have tripled since last year’s nadir with Brent crude close to $60 per barrel as demand hopes rise and Opec holds back supply.
The rise of the BRIC economies – Brazil, Russia, India and crucially China – triggered the last commodities supercycle in the 2000s. The emergence of the metals-hungry developing economies fuelled the commodities market, with the value of copper rocketing five-fold.
The next supercycle may be driven more by the West. The two greatest threats to the global economy – Covid and climate change – could herald the arrival of a metals boom.
The response of governments to the financial crisis was to tighten belts and clamp down on public spending. Monetary rather than fiscal policy rode to the global economy’s rescue, but roles have reversed during the pandemic. With central banks now operating with depleted ammunition on monetary policy, governments have had to rely on fiscal firepower to prop up their economies.
Plans for spending on infrastructure and green investment in particular are being drawn up. Infrastructure spending is widely seen as one of the quicker and most effective ways of boosting economies.
Boris Johnson has promised an infrastructure revolution to power his climate and levelling up pledges. Meanwhile, Biden has pledged that trillions of dollars will be pumped into America’s crumbling infrastructure, particularly on green initiatives.
Goldman Sachs analyst Jeffrey Currie argues the start of a commodities bull market has many similarities to the 2000s boom.
He says green spending could be “as big as BRIC’s investment 20 years ago” with under-investment in supply of “almost all commodities” and a weak dollar also echoing the price surge of the 2000s.
Metals driving the boom in green technologies – such as nickel, cobalt, lithium, copper and rare-earth metals – were seeing rising demand even before the pandemic. But governments are now stepping up plans to combine their climate and stimulus ambitions, especially ahead of the COP26 summit.
“It’s not just the fact that we’ve got stimulus projects coming along, but we’re all converting to renewable energy and electric vehicles,” Meyer says.
“These would be massive drivers on their own... I just think the world is going to struggle to produce enough metal, particularly for the new electric economy.”
He says the demand for metals used in the electric revolution will create “deficit situations across the board” as supply fails to meet fervent appetite.
“The fact is, the world doesn’t produce enough commodities. It doesn’t produce enough copper, nickel, tin, zinc.”
Meyer expects copper, currently at just below $8,000 a tonne, to reach $10,000 in the next two years while he says nickel could breach the $20,000 a tonne mark this year, a $2,000 increase.
A man walks with a roll of copper tubing at a store in Shanghai, China
Chinese infrastructure and construction accounts for 30pc of global copper demand CREDIT: Bloomberg
Some analysts remain supercycle sceptics, however. Daniel Major from UBS expects most commodity prices to peak in 2021.
“We acknowledge that the demand base is much larger now than it was 10 years ago, but we expect demand growth to be materially lower over next one to two years than in the ‘supercycle’ years and supply is set to recover from Covid disruption.”
He says the metals used for electric batteries will “experience transformational demand growth”, but says the driver from the green push needs to be put in context.
Chinese infrastructure and construction accounts for 30pc of global copper demand but these sectors will “plateau and contract over the next 10 years”, Major argues. Electric vehicles and renewables currently account for just 5pc of demand.
If the supercycle advocates are right, demand in China will become less important to metal markets in the post-pandemic recovery. The world’s second-largest economy accounts for at least half of the consumption of key base metals, including copper, aluminium and nickel, but analysts are shifting their focus.
Citigroup’s Oliver Nugent believes “the market will pay more attention to the world ex-China demand than it has arguably done for the past decade”.
High demand for consumer goods such as washing machines and fridges outside of China will push the copper market into a deficit later this year, he argues.

Capture.JPG.061128f005717abfc2b8ffb00fca0949.JPG

 

Capture2.JPG.f77122da62e78d5aef0a2487aa60c776.JPG

Thanks for posting. Great confirmation article for this thread, could almost have been written by our own Durhamborn!! ...Was it?!                                                                                                                                                    But what's with the weird article line(can't highlight unfortunately): 'A man walks with a roll of copper tubing at a store in Shanghai, China....' sounds like the start of an old 1970's joke?!?                                         NB. Thinking about this further, I would really like to discover the punchline - perhaps it may even reveal how all this macro stuff ends! (though very inscrutable I've heard, those Chinese)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As part of our hospital re-build I’ve just been informed that a number of departments will be smaller than planned due to foreseeable reduction in the birth rate in the East of London. Interesting statement to make, and Could well influence macro decisions for investment.

It does seem to fly in the face of the huge amount of building from Finsbury Park down to Canning Town- with huge tower blocks of flats being put up.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The western Oil/gas majors are under a lot of pressure/blackmail to reduce their hydrocarbon production and change to renewables. Perhaps, they should move their headquarters and registered offices to Singapore. Trafigura, privately owned and registered in Singapore, put out press releases about how concerned it was about the environment and emissions. But, it puts billions into Rosneft's Vostok Oil Arctic project. It's been the main news story for the bbc/cnbc/etc. Oh, that's right, it's never been mentioned. Apparently, it's ok for Singapore to finance the supply of Russian oil to China. Perhaps, I should increase my holdings in Gazprom.
 

From the FT,

 

"              Western companies know partnering with Russia’s state-backed oil and gas producers carries political and reputational risks that must be weighed against gaining access to the country’s bounty of natural resources.

But for Trafigura, becoming Rosneft’s go-to commodity trader has a more concrete expense: €1.5bn of its own cash, injected into a €7.3bn deal for a 10 per cent stake in a gargantuan Arctic oil project backed by President Vladimir Putin.

The full extent of Trafigura’s investment in Vostok Oil, its largest ever, illustrates the lengths to which it will go to cement its relationship with Rosneft and secure millions of barrels of crude for its huge trading business.

As US sanctions have squeezed the Russian group’s access to credit, Trafigura has vied with rival Glencore to become the favoured partner of the world’s second-largest oil producer and win prized supply agreements.

But investing in a vast project in an environmentally sensitive area, at a time when Trafigura faces pressure to adapt its business model as developed economies start the long transition away from fossil fuels, has raised questions.

It comes as the company, which is owned by 850 employee shareholders, is planning a multibillion-dollar push into renewable energy with an Australian partner and has just announced its first emissions targets. But it is far from turning its back on the oil trade.

“When traders look to buy equity in a project it’s normally to create a degree of ‘stickiness’ with the commodities it produces and the partner,” said Roland Rechtsteiner at consultancy Oliver Wyman. He added that there had been “a growing trend of buying into assets” to secure “offtake” supply deals and “long-term relationships with the largest oil producers”.

“The offtake is where the money is,” said one senior commodity banker, noting that while Trafigura’s investment was “a big number . . . the deal washes its face on profit from the offtake volumes”.

Vostok Oil will develop a new oil-producing region on Siberia’s Taymyr Peninsula to rival the US Permian Basin and Saudi Arabia’s Ghawar oilfield. It will pull together existing production of about 370,000 barrels per day and exploration assets and link them to markets in Europe and Asia via the Northern Sea Route, a fair-weather shipping lane between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.

“This is a long-term investment for the group in an exciting oil and gas company with a resource base for liquid hydrocarbons of 6bn tonnes, including confident recoverable reserves of about 3bn tonnes,” a Trafigura spokesperson said. “The oil production potential of the project's open and promising deposits is comparable to the largest projects in the Middle East.”

The project, which will cost up to $150bn to develop, includes the construction of 15 towns to house the thousands of workers needed to drill the oil wells and operate the infrastructure.

But it is expected by analysts to produce 1m barrels of oil per day by 2028 and more than 2m b/d by 2035 — the equivalent of roughly 2 per cent of global supply — while favourable tax conditions should boost returns.

Trafigura is the first investor but Rosneft is also expected to seek support from China and India at a time when US sanctions have restricted its access to western financing. Having a large international trader such as Trafigura onboard is seen as one step to boost the project’s appeal. Other trading houses approached by Rosneft have been cautious about investing.

Trafigura already has a strong relationship with Rosneft, which has been the subject of US financial sanctions since 2014, having helped it raise funds through permitted short-term prepayment oil deals. It was also part of the Rosneft-led consortium that in 2017 took control of Nayara, formerly Essar Oil, including a big refinery in India.

Data from Petro-Logistics SA, a consultancy that monitors oil flows, show that Trafigura shipped roughly 400,000 barrels a day of Rosneft’s crude in 2019 and 250,000 b/d last year, compared with 280,000 b/d and 140,000 b/d respectively for Glencore. Trafigura declined to comment on the numbers.

While the investment in Vostok Oil is permitted under existing US sanctions Jason Hungerford, a partner at law firm Mayer Brown, said there was a risk that the incoming US administration of Joe Biden could take a more hawkish stance towards Russia.

“The US has always avoided directly sanctioning Rosneft's oil exports because of the disruption it could cause in global energy markets,” Mr Hungerford said. “But the direction of travel suggests that stricter sanctions in the future are possible.”

He added that “it might only take one incident — like the arrest of [Alexei] Navalny this week — to raise the temperature between Washington and Moscow, and Rosneft is clearly seen by the US as a pressure point it can target”.

Trafigura made its investment through a Singapore-registered special purpose vehicle called CB Enterprises, financing the deal with debt and equity.

Corporate filings in Singapore show the €5.775bn syndicated loan facility was organised by Credit Bank of Moscow, a fast-growing lender with ties to Rosneft and its chief executive Igor Sechin — one of Mr Putin’s closest allies.

The loans, which are non recourse, have a maturity of 13 years and have a five-year grace period on repayments. They would be paid back through the dividends generated by Vostok Oil, Credit Bank of Moscow said in a statement.

In addition to the loan, Trafigura said it was investing €1.5bn of its own cash,

That makes it the largest acquisition in Trafigura’s 27-year history and values Vostok Oil at almost €73bn. To put those figures in perspective, Trafigura’s group equity was $7.8bn (€6.4bn) at the end of September while Rosneft’s market capitalisation is $70bn (€55bn).

The investment follows a blockbuster year for Trafigura, which cashed in on the market chaos unleashed by the coronavirus pandemic to report record earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation of $6bn, up from $2.1bn in 2019.

That cut Trafigura’s adjusted total debt to $2.76bn from $5.3bn, giving it the confidence to push ahead with the deal, according to people with knowledge of the deal.

The transaction has some similarities with the 2016 deal in which Glencore and Qatar’s sovereign wealth fund joined forces to buy an $11bn stake in Rosneft. But while Glencore disposed of its interest in the special purpose vehicle used to make the purchase after 20 months, holding on to a five-year, 220,000 barrel per day supply agreement, Trafigura has no plans to flip its stake in Vostok Oil.

The key prize will be increased access to Rosneft’s crude, including low-cost barrels from the Arctic development. This would be a light, sweet crude with a relatively low carbon footprint that will not require any domestic blending, analysts said.

Trafigura declined to comment on the size of the supply deals but bankers think the volumes are significant — an initial 10m barrels of oil per month (about 330,000 barrels per day) and more once production from Vostok Oil ramps up. That would cement Trafigura’s position as the dominant exporter of Rosneft’s crude.

Trafigura sees Vostok Oil as an important project for an industry that has been starved of investment because of low prices and the pivot to renewables by western oil majors.

“We expect that new, low-cost sources of oil will continue to be required to support essential human needs for some time,” Jeremy Weir, Trafigura’s chief executive, said this month.

 

Trafigura is the biggest handler of Rosneft supplied oil

image.png.d88e8b7399226fbd425a5128a0a6fc8b.png

 

Vostok Oil’s estimated output for Taymyr Peninsula

image.png.3adc0310fb3bca80477aa1948dbcc53e.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JMD said:

                                                                                                                              But what's with the weird article line(can't highlight unfortunately): 'A man walks with a roll of copper tubing at a store in Shanghai, China....'

Picture of someone carrying copper into a store in Shanghai that I omitted from the post

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Democorruptcy said:

When DB mentioned bitcoin a while back I posted a table of firms that had done well because of their exposure to it, thinking what might happen if a bigger firm went in. I didn't make the post I intended earlier because I couldn't be bothered after having to scroll through so much about bitcoin. Now you have drawn me back in with a quote... next Thursday 18th a few thread darlings BP, RDSB, IMB, GSK all go ex-dividend. 

Thanks Democorruptcy, for reminding me (not your intention, I know!) of DurhamBorn's BTC posts and subsequent discussion had here, mid last year I believe it was. (For BTC sceptics, please read 'bonkers tulip craze', as I do not seek to offend anyone!). Anyway I believe those initial BTC posts actually piqued some readers interest here, given coming from our host - certainly did for me, so I for one am thankful. Its one of the great characteristics of this thread that it airs expansive/important ideas (from the specific 'oil sector', to the diverse 'macro', mentioning no names so not to cause embarrasment!) and allows topics that might get shouted down on other forums. However, I have noticed a new sarcastic, not to mention 'tin ear' nature of recent discussions, that is disapointing... Just my thoughts, could be wrong, I often am.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, leonardratso said:

is it this guy?

Image result for Picture of someone carrying copper into a store in Shanghai

Think it might some illegitimate son of @Yellow_Reduced_Sticker from his navy days

Yes. He's a communist party surveillance expert.

Unfortunately, his disguises never work due to his easily recognisable abnormally large left forearm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have a view on Royal Mail and where they are valued currently? My reason for asking is that I've learned some figures around projected volumes required to enable the governments latest corona scheme involving mail order testing for the whole country. They're estimating circa ten times the volumes they handle every Christmas. And this is for something that we keep hearing will be required for years. I know Amazon logistics are involved in delivering kits too but that capacity number really stunned me and I thought it may be of interest here. If the previous statements are true then it could be looking very cheap

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Harley said:

spacer.png

IMO this is a macro thread ("Credit deflation and the reflation cycle to come").  I tried talking macro but some people didn't bother to understand and were rude about it and/or just wanted stock tips rather than fish in the other threads, posting glib responses to thought out and invested posts.  You could just put most on ignore, except Sancho, CattleProd, DB and co who continue to do well.  A bit of off-topic is reasonable and to be expected but rather than say too much BTC (which there is), etc I've noticed a reduction in macro, thus upsetting the balance.  But TBF "macro" is a bit nebulous and BTC has it's place in the correct context (say in discussing asset allocations and trends) but deep dives, well we have other threads for such things.  A bit of a balanced judgement call.  I for one promise to refocus on macro and post less!

PS:  Not referring your your post but in this context I'm fearful I'm beginning to notice a general change of tone across many threads, maybe mirroring the general angst out there among the population.

PPS: Home made tuna pizza tonight, but I'll leave it there!

I think your right Harley that we are not putting much of use on the thread at the minute.Im actually struggling myself to do much work,and everywhere i look seems to be sending signals we are in a holding pattern.Lots of people have come to the thread late as well when we have been positioning a long time.Bitcoin of course sends a macro message.Its that people are losing faith in Fiat.Life itself is a road map and you could argue is what the macro plays off.

If we take a 21 year old.If they earn £12 an hour,and houses are £80k and interest rates 5% then they see a roadmap to owning a house.They see their savings increase with the interest,they see the deposit build,they dont rush or gamble because the goal is always in reach.Its doable without consuming your life.

When a house is £200k and the jobs are temporary and savings get no interest the goal seems ever out of reach,not doable.

So the likes of Bitcoin have two drivers.First CBs are losing (and so Fiat) the trust of the people,and 2nd people are gambling to try to make enough to do what should be normal things.

So for me Bitcoin is another signal that printing is so high inflation must arrive,and that real assets are going to be coming into their own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RUSSELL NAPIER: GROWING WEALTH IN AN INFLATION AVALANCHE

Took this from the comments on RealVision its a good interview to which i want to listen to it again

This was an amazing interview, definitely worth a second watch. Just some random points:

Russell Napier introduces an important real world concept that Nassim Taleb has also talked about...cause and effect.

Do unions cause wage inflation or does inflation create a union movement which causes wages to rise?

Russell Napier sees a 3 pronged investment boom in the years ahead.

1)Green/ESG revolution

2)Buying stuff not made in China

3)Shorter distribution chains The ESG movement is bullish for above ground gold because more gold will stay in the ground.

 

The history of inflation is a history of commodity inflation. When the public realizes their savings are better off in consumables that is a major turning point, especially for food inflation.

Weimar Republic...farmers were the big winners because their debts were paid off by inflation and they could sell their produce at inflation adjusted prices. (I am sure all on here realize how many wealthy people are buying agricultural land) Also, look at the interview Max Wiethe did with Shawn Hackett last fall to see how weather could be nitroglycerine for food prices in the years ahead.

Politicians make the same mistake over and over but give it a different name. That communist Richard Nixon (sarcasm) instituted wage and price controls, and in Canada, Fidel Castro lover Pierre Trudeau did the same thing....message here, political ideologies do not matter, politicians will do what they have to do whether left or right of the spectrum. In the last few minutes Russell Napier explains how the yield cap will be implemented and it may not be pretty for stocks.

Also Russell Napier recommended a novel for the literary out there by Graeme Greene ...'Travels With My Aunt'. Finally, google a 1970s article by Warren Buffett 'How Inflation Swindles the Equity Investor'

Uploaded the downloaded audio here enjoy

https://www.dropbox.com/s/c1ie7lic79rqcrc/russellnapiergrowingwealthinan.mp3?dl=0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

working woman
1 hour ago, dnb24 said:

As part of our hospital re-build I’ve just been informed that a number of departments will be smaller than planned due to foreseeable reduction in the birth rate in the East of London. Interesting statement to make, and Could well influence macro decisions for investment.

It does seem to fly in the face of the huge amount of building from Finsbury Park down to Canning Town- with huge tower blocks of flats being put up.

 

My Brother-in-Law works in regeneration in East London and a couple of years ago he was telling me about a huge project planned along the banks of the Thames, involving the building of thousands of houses. I've seen the plans and it looks interesting. No idea if it will really go ahead.

Maybe your bosses know about the plans for this and think people will move out of the old East End into these new areas to raise families and commute into London for work.

"The Thames Gateway is Europe’s largest regeneration project, stretching 40 miles along the Thames estuary from Canary Wharf in London to Southend in Essex and Sittingbourne in Kent. The area includes the largest designated brownfield site in the south of England, which is intended to become a leading eco-region".

The government anticipates the Thames Gateway will provide environmental jobs and lead the way with a greater use of renewables and new technologies. Carbon neutral improvements to both new and existing homes and buildings will aim to create a leading eco-region for the rest of the country to follow.

Regenerating existing towns and creating new carbon-neutral urban developments is intended to transform the Thames Gateway region and relieve the huge demand for housing in the south east region.

The Thames Gateway is a cluster of cities, towns and villages around the Thames estuary. Each is different and individual, but networked together".

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dnb24 said:

As part of our hospital re-build I’ve just been informed that a number of departments will be smaller than planned due to foreseeable reduction in the birth rate in the East of London. Interesting statement to make, and Could well influence macro decisions for investment.

It does seem to fly in the face of the huge amount of building from Finsbury Park down to Canning Town- with huge tower blocks of flats being put up.

 

Yes that's interesting. Not being sarcastic, but I honestly didn't think that level of forward planning existed. But if decisions such as that are being, it makes me think a 'sea change' in thinking is occuring behind the scenes.                                                                                                                                                                                I do also have a tangential question. But I heard this week that recent analysis of the civic stats has shown that cv19 infection rates and disease effects were far lower amongst the UK Chinese community population. If that's true, that's got to be a very significant 'fact', and might explain a lot, re. the Asian pandemic control success story?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@dnb24 What were the drivers leading to a predicted fall in the birth rate please? White flight as first generation east London hipsters move out to leafier suburbs, enabled by mass remote working? EEers returning home post Brexit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bricks & Mortar

Macro attempt.

All around I see madness.  The soaring 'coins',  the gamestops, wallstreetbets, the housing market, the various commodities, Tesla, Apple, Amazon, etc. etc.  I think we NEED a BK event in our near future. 
I mean, what if this nonsense continues?  It'll just suck more and more into speculation.  I'm thinking the two choices are BK event, or accelerate to hyperinflation in short order.  In Weimar Germany, it wasn't very far from here, to wheelbarrows of cash for a loaf.

The end game of hyperinflation will be a new, sounder currency.  We can see our central banks are preparing for this, with many papers and even experiments in digital currency turning up around the world.

I think a good % of the investing public is seeing the inflation possibilities, seeing how it ends in hyperinflation, and seeing the digital currency plan.  As DB put it, losing 'confidence in fiat'.  They've filled in the blanks and are looking to dump fiat for whatever they can get.  There's a general expectation that everything is going 'to da moon'.

What's missing, is the stated intentions of governments, central banks, and the global overlords at the WEF, IMF, BIS et al.  They want a huge round of printy-printy spanning many years, in which they'll re-order the economy to make it how they want it.
I don't think they have enough time, if we go straight to hyper-inflation from here.
They're gonna HAVE TO put the brakes on.  HAVE TO cause a BK event.  Because there can't be more printy-printy after we move to a sound currency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, DurhamBorn said:

So the likes of Bitcoin have two drivers.First CBs are losing (and so Fiat) the trust of the people,and 2nd people are gambling to try to make enough to do what should be normal things.

So for me Bitcoin is another signal that printing is so high inflation must arrive,and that real assets are going to be coming into their own.

I think that first part was probably on point in 2017, when it was the little guy driving the crypto market up. Which could also be the reason why inflation did not arrive at the time - because retail is just a small piece of the market puzzle. This time it's the institutional uptake that's driving the price, which hints at the big boys getting increasingly desperate in chase for yields.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, JMD said:

                                                                                                                                                                        I do also have a tangential question. But I heard this week that recent analysis of the civic stats has shown that cv19 infection rates and disease effects were far lower amongst the UK Chinese community population. If that's true, that's got to be a very significant 'fact', and might explain a lot, re. the Asian pandemic control success story?

I have two friends working in vaccine research - one at GSK, another in a startup whose name escapes me. They and their teams are utterly convinced that Covid 19 was created in a lab. If it were created for nefarious purposes (I'll leave aside whether its release was deliberate or not), it would make sense for it to be designed to be more lethal to your typical westerner than someone with Chinese genes.

I realise it sounds like a conspiracy theory, but I'm no conspiracy nut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, AWW said:

@dnb24 What were the drivers leading to a predicted fall in the birth rate please? White flight as first generation east London hipsters move out to leafier suburbs, enabled by mass remote working? EEers returning home post Brexit?

I don’t know tbh, I think what you've stated  would be correct but there wasn’t any further determination/explanation. 
My thoughts are along the macro line- and echo @DurhamBorn in that we are at that inflection point where society isn’t interested in procreation (woke issues/lack of future/lack of faith - secular/financial/societal). It is also probably true that London has seen its day- TPTB need labour to move North.

 @spygirlhas been talking about it for a long time but this last year has really dented the financial job market in London- and either by design or chance- I can see the graduates/apprentices from 2022/23 moving up to Newcastle/Liverpool than down to London.

Would be interesting to see if the hospital planners up north expect to see higher birth rates?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To state the obvious, there seem to be a lot of things going on at the moment around the nature of money. That hasn't really been a debate since the 1970's and the closing of the gold window. That's perhaps another thing supporting DB's belief in the similarities of the 1970's to the present day.

However, the debates now seem much more diverse than Nixon's wriggling out of the straight-jacket of hard money. We had that gentleman up-thread, who looks like a retired vicar (if I remember aright), saying that China has been lending dollars to developing nations, secured against physical assets like ports. That suddenly means that China gets a piece of America's "economic hitman" action. I think it means that if America wanted to run a strong dollar policy, this would directly drive the growth of Chinese dominance, as they collect the assets from the bankrupt. China would be using America's financial/military complex to grow its own empire, like a parasitoid.

That adds another motivation for the USA to weaken the dollar, to go alongside their desire to appease the masses, and prefer inflation to unemployment. If America still had a feeling of manifest destiny, it would find itself in a trap; but if the elites of the USA are really "the China class", as the Tablet magazine article "The 30 tyrants" frames it, then perhaps China actually wants a strong dollar now?

Another big theme is central bank backed digital currencies, where the theme is control, transparency and ultimately tyranny. I guess this is more important politically than financially, but it may drive a larger part of the economy away from the conventional financial machinery, and into alternatives. This could be much bigger than just the drugs-and-filth sector of the erstwhile "silk road".

I find BTC/crypto/defi interesting for two, coupled, reasons. Firstly, it is starting to create a viable parallel financial structure which is not (yet) under state control, and is intrinsically borderless. It's interesting what drove the adoption of money in the first place: it was taxation; that there was an urgent, coercive reason for people to have money. It's less obvious what is the driving force to have a currency not backed by the state's violence and extraction of taxes. Many startup currencies have failed as there is no driver for them. To me, crypto always seemed like it had a parasitic relation to the state: the real reason for it initially thriving was to avoid state rules on illegal things. That doesn't mean it can't become a self-sustaining thing (like conventional, state-backed currencies are mostly used for transactions outside direct state control and unrelated to taxation), but cryptos, in this picture, would paradoxically get their ultimate back-stop, their raison d'etre, from the guns of the state.

The second point is that if it becomes big enough, it might start to compete with fiat. Hazlett had the idea that in an inflationary environment, where faith in fiat starts to fail, you could get the opposite of Gresham's law: that a hard currency, if it is practical, could out-compete fiat. It is so much easier to plan business decisions in a hard currency, versus the fluctuating uncertainties of multi-inflation (where you might up accidentally distributing capital as dividends, for example). However, that needs a stable hard currency, and BTC is nowhere near that. My interest is in whether BTC gets big enough and stable enough to start to force some inflation discipline on the "real" currencies.

Lastly, we have CP's suggestion that China might have to move to a gold standard in international transactions for oil, because people start to lose faith in the dollar, and aren't likely to have any faith in the yuan, let alone a panopticon Chinese digital currency.

So, there seem to be huge forces pulling in different directions. I get the impression (and I may be entirely wrong) that China would benefit from hard currencies, while the USA would be forced by them to face its own internal contradictions and the economic divides which have been papered over by printing, so will strongly favour soft money. Perhaps this is the real tipping point in world hegemony, and the size of the GDP is the fake news. The real question is actually: who is the creditor and who the debtor; who wants hard money, and who wants to wriggle out of their obligations?

Sorry, a poorly thought out stream-of-consciousness...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Cattle Prod said:

This is what I mean about journalism.

- No mention of BP's shareholding in Rosneft

- Didn't point out the bleedingly obvious that Trafigura is under no pressure from its shareholders, as they work for the company. Any 'pressure' they are coming under is non existent. On the other hand, Western oilies are being threatened daily by their biggest institutional shareholders.

I honestly don't know what slant the FT is aiming for here. The traders take stakes from time to time, what of it other than they clearly see money about to piss out of it?

Two trigger words for the FT: Russia (boo, hiss, pantomime vilain) and Arctic (what an ideal planet should look like, ie no humans)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...