• Welcome to DOSBODS

    Please consider creating a free account to be able to access all the features of the DOSBODS community. It only takes 20 seconds!

Sign in to follow this  
JFK

Tommy Robinson Update; The Sign is Back Up! Even Bigger and Better

Recommended Posts

If ultimately he is forced to take it down guess there must be a case for loss of earnings for not being able to espouse a cause that even politicians go on about endlessly - you know, they will not win and so on (I realise that politicians are also the worst sorts of hypocrites going).

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jul/06/theresa-may-accused-of-double-standards-over-terrorism-funding

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, twocents said:

If ultimately he is forced to take it down guess there must be a case for loss of earnings for not being able to espouse a cause that even politicians go on about endlessly - you know, they will not win and so on (I realise that politicians are also the worst sorts of hypocrites going).

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jul/06/theresa-may-accused-of-double-standards-over-terrorism-funding

The power of the internet hopefully and the rising anti-SJW sentiment will see that! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, JFK said:

The power of the internet hopefully and the rising anti-SJW sentiment will see that! 

Let's hope so. If it goes to the council to rule on his alcohol licence, you can guess what comes next...!

It is a concern that the Police are not observing their prime directive (or is that Star Trek?).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, XswampyX said:

Then why are they protecting terrorism? If a sign saying don't support terrorism is against the law then this implies that supporting terrorism is ok.

IsisFlag.jpg.cde9c4e519e60e5b6db301830814ee8f.jpg

Source :- http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/britain-first_uk_58919241e4b03ab749ddcdea

Well from the way in which the establishment is currently behaving, yes I think you do think it is acceptable if not actually ok.  End justifying means and all that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, One percent said:

Well from the way in which the establishment is currently behaving, yes I think they do think it is acceptable if not actually ok.  End justifying means and all that

 

Edited by One percent
Not trying to qote myself edit for clarity was the intention

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Rare Bear said:

I passed a Polish shop the other day which had 'John III Sobieski' as part of it's name. I wonder how long before some SJW type objects?

Those phallic sausages and gherkins.xD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 14/07/2017 at 13:48, Rare Bear said:

I passed a Polish shop the other day which had 'John III Sobieski' as part of it's name. I wonder how long before some SJW type objects?

They are too thick to have any clue as to who 'John III Sobieski' was and lack the critical thinking skills to find out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I am going to stick what I wrote in another thread here also:

-----------------

 

Folks, I have only just read up on this in the past half an hour or so. I am just going to comment on the perceived current legal aspect of this.

It is difficult to find out what exactly happened. But it seems that no British person is allowed to comment on any of what may or may not have happened yesterday. It is that simple. Doing so can result in punishment determined by the courts. That probably WILL mean jail time for anyone who breaks it.

This means me. This means this website. This means YOU!

For your own freedom and the sake of this enlightened forum this thread, and any other ones about this particular case, MUST end now. No more comments on it.

If you wish to discuss free speech, courts and the UK generally then may I suggest that another thread is started - but one which makes NO mention of anything OR ANY INDIVIDUAL(S) involved with what may or may not have occurred in Leeds.

Don't shoot the messenger!

Edited by The Masked Tulip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, The Masked Tulip said:

I am going to stick what I wrote in another thread here also:

-----------------

 

Folks, I have only just read up on this in the past half an hour or so. I am just going to comment on the perceived current legal aspect of this.

It is difficult to find out what exactly happened. But it seems that no British person is allowed to comment on any of what may or may not have happened yesterday. It is that simple. Doing so can result in punishment determined by the courts. That probably WILL mean jail time for anyone who breaks it.

This means me. This means this website. This means YOU!

For your own freedom and the sake of this enlightened forum this thread, and any other ones about this particular case, MUST end now. No more comments on it.

If you wish to discuss free speech, courts and the UK generally then may I suggest that another thread is started - but one which makes NO mention of anything OR ANY INDIVIDUAL(S) involved with what may or may not have occurred in Leeds.

Don't shoot the messenger!

This thing we can't mention seems to have been attracting a fair amount of attention around the world if my rather cursory googling is anything to go by. Picked up by quite a few commentators in the US so will be going global.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, The Masked Tulip said:

It is difficult to find out what exactly happened. But it seems that no British person is allowed to comment on any of what may or may not have happened yesterday. It is that simple. Doing so can result in punishment determined by the courts. That probably WILL mean jail time for anyone who breaks it.

Is it just me, or can you almost hear the quiver in the official voice as of late

The Ceaucescu moment will happen

Edited by Panther

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, Panther said:

Is it just me, or can you almost hear the quiver in the official voice as of late

The Ceaucescu moment will happen

It is a duty of us and others to make it happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Bkkandrew said:

It is a duty of us and others to make it happen.

The person who gets Dianne Abbot is going to be able to do it without too much training ... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, Southmartin said:

The person who gets Dianne Abbot is going to be able to do it without too much training ... 

Gets Dianne pregnant?

Didnt jezza try?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Cunning Plan said:

That Intel is on a need to know basis.

And I really don't need to know.

Once imagined you can't un-imagine it.....the horror.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Cunning Plan said:

That Intel is on a need to know basis.

And I really don't need to know.

Very few people actually want to know... I wish i'd been on holiday the week that story broke... For weeks I had nightmares about those old SilentNight bed adverts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Southmartin said:

Very few people actually want to know... I wish i'd been on holiday the week that story broke... For weeks I had nightmares about those old SilentNight bed adverts

An upvote just isn't enough. :DxD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.