• Welcome to DOSBODS

     

    DOSBODS is free of any advertising.

    Ads are annoying, and - increasingly - advertising companies limit free speech online. DOSBODS Forums are completely free to use. Please create a free account to be able to access all the features of the DOSBODS community. It only takes 20 seconds!

     

Sign in to follow this  
Chewing Grass

DIY Railguns

Recommended Posts

37 minutes ago, XswampyX said:

$25,000 !!! per shot. 

Like most military stuff, it doesn't actually cost that (well, in the same way a normal consumed asset might be costed).  It is the support cost divided by number of shots in the support.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, dgul said:

Like most military stuff, it doesn't actually cost that (well, in the same way a normal consumed asset might be costed).  It is the support cost divided by number of shots in the support.

Yep, it's a bit more advanced than I first thought as it explodes near the object that they want to destroy. At Mach 7 (5370.88 MPH) that's pretty amazing.

Anyway they don't have to earn that $25,000 do they? ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, XswampyX said:

Yep, it's a bit more advanced than I first thought as it explodes near the object that they want to destroy. At Mach 7 (5370.88 MPH) that's pretty amazing.

Anyway they don't have to earn that $25,000 do they? ;)

That $25,000 goes into the economy -- some guy in a factory can now buy a car, a boffin in a lab can buy a new hat, a HGV driver can get a burger.  It doesn't just disappear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, dgul said:

That $25,000 goes into the economy -- some guy in a factory can now buy a car, a boffin in a lab can buy a new hat, a HGV driver can get a burger.  It doesn't just disappear.

Waht!

It has to come out of it first. 

Next you are going to tell me public sector workers pay income tax! xD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, XswampyX said:

Waht!

It has to come out of it first. 

Next you are going to tell me public sector workers pay income tax! xD

It is absolutely the broken window fallacy.  The world has one railgun projectile, where it could have spent its money (== labour and talent) on something more useful.  But the money does go back into the economy.  And maybe the railgun projectile is particularly useful if your country is about to be invaded (but that is a difficult judgement to make).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, dgul said:

(but that is a difficult judgement to make)

I agree.

But the $25,000 was taken from ordinary people via the threat of force and given to the military to fire this weapon. It doesn't matter at all how they (the scientist, lorry driver or steel worker) spend it. The original owners of that $25,000 had their own (better?) plans for it.

At best the money still exists, but the wrong people now have it.

Having said all that if it's cheaper and better than what they had before then that's good, but only in the way that they didn't have to take more money from us plebs.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I was about twelve I made one of these out of a glass tube from my chemistry set.  A coil I wound myself and my toy train set transformer.  It shot pins and needles across the living room remarkably well.  My friends were impressed but I guess one of 'em talked and word got out.. I take full responsibility for the whole project.  Loose lips sink ships. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Happy Renting said:

No dinner service is safe anymore.

If the dinner service was more than about 10 feet away from that amateur railgun, it was pretty safe, they were unable to hit the central part of a target the size of a dinner plate at 20 feet.

I was wondering about the electricity required to repeatedly fire the military railgun fast enough to take down multiple targets - how much? (question for the voltage geeks out there)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, MrPin said:

Well the energy is 1/2 M V^2.

See here :- http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/us-navys-railgun-dream-could-be-denied-by-two-big-problems-17301

Quote

The railgun launches rounds using electromagnetic force rather than explosive propellant. The USN prototype has 100MJ of pulse-power capacitors and a 25MW powerplant for recharging. The capacitors release their stored charge into the railgun barrel in a hundredth of a second, accelerating the projectile to about Mach 6. The USN’s goal is to fire ten rounds per minute, so the capacitors need to be recharged to fire every 6 seconds.
Few warships have the spare electrical capacity the weapon requires. The strongest candidate is the USN’s Zumwalt-class destroyer, whose 78MW integrated power system can dynamically distribute power between propulsion and on-board systems. It should have about 58MW of reserve power while steaming at 20 knots. By comparison, the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer has only 7.5MW for on-board systems.
The USN previously had several nuclear-powered cruisers, but the last were decommissioned in the 1990s. A new class of nuclear-powered warships could host multiple railguns (or other power-hungry weapons). But before the USN commits the kind of money required, it has to prove that the weapon is worth the investment.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tyler has been writing articles about the railgun for several years - especially regard to the new US heavy cruiser which, as the projectiles are so expensive, has had its railgun put on hold.

Anyhow, if you are interested, here is Tyler's latest article on the railgun. He usually puts links to his previous articles on it in the latest article.

Btw, be proud - one of the two options for the US is a BAE railgun.

http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/12716/watch-the-navys-electromagnetic-railguns-autoloader-feed-a-multi-shot-salvo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Libspero
      Ok..  bit of a puzzle for anyone who's got a bit more experience at this stuff.
      I'm having trouble changing a lightbulb.   Please don't judge me 
      So we have 5 small spots in the kitchen,  all 12V GU4 kind..  a couple of them had blown so I duly went on Amazon and bought myself a pack of 6 LED equivalents with the idea of swapping them all out at one go. Job done.
      So I swap them all out,  smugly admire my handy work..  flick the light switch..  and brief flicker..  then nothing.
      After the initial surprise I fish around behind one of the fittings and pull out the 12V transformer. Rated 20 to 60 watts.  Hmm..  so I decide that it's some sort of energy saving feature in the transformer that prevents any current draw when the light isn't turned on.  Except the LEDs only pull about 3.5 watts and thus the transformer thinks there's nothing attached.
      So I have a bit of a brainwave and decide, why not wire all the LEDs in parallel from a single transformer..  so I went about fashioning a Heath Robinson bit of wiring to test my theory.  Even with all 6 wired in parallel (should be 21 Watts) still a flicker and then nothing.  Hmm..  ok,  wire up one of the old bulbs and some of the new LED ones to the same transformer..  hallelujah,  ALL of them work perfectly.   Theory proved, sort of.  But still can't get 6 LEDs to run on their own.
      While I was dicking around with it I managed to blow the transformer by shorting it out on the 12V side..  need to get a new one now anyway.
      Question to the forum..  has anyone else had this problem?  What did you do? Can you recommend a suitable transformer for LEDs?
      Should I just pull the lot out and wire in 240V spots instead and have done with it?
       
    • By Popuplights
      I just noticed this on another thread.
      relative had one...electric window got stuck. For some reason warranty didnt cover it. To fix....best part of a grand. 
      Now I sort of suspect that many DOSBODDERS would be like me, and that on hearing the price of this minor repair, would bid the dealer farewell, go home and have a crack at diagnosing and fixing it myself. In fact I have done so on my old Peugeot van.
      I think the resources now available to assist in this type of thing are incredible. YouTube is an immensely valuable library of how-to videos, and in many cases just following the video and installing a part sourced online is very easy.
      I have replaced laptop batteries, phone batteries and screens using these resources, and taught my son how to do it too. In fact, he is now sought out by his mates as the phone fixer.
      So do we think these  kind of skills are diminishing, or being enhanced by the easy availability of parts and instructions.?
      Over to the DOSBODS massive.
       
    • By Chewing Grass
      Been looking at various vinyls that can be used for wrapping for two reasons.
      1) I'm getting a roof rack, gutter mounted (I know, very very retro) for new vehicle and am thinking of two-toning the vehicle with a gloss black roof and vinyl would also might stop me scratching the paint.
      2) There seems to be great scope for wrapping all sorts of other things with curves and some of the films available look really interesting.
      Anyone done it at home i.e. DIY wrapping.
      https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Brushed-Aluminium-Vinyl-Wrap-Car-Air-Bubble-Free-All-Colours-All-Sizes/322053360233
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.