• Welcome to DOSBODS

     

    DOSBODS is free of any advertising.

    Ads are annoying, and - increasingly - advertising companies limit free speech online. DOSBODS Forums are completely free to use. Please create a free account to be able to access all the features of the DOSBODS community. It only takes 20 seconds!

     

Sign in to follow this  
Austin Allegro

Is Black Lives Matter really about the Lockdown?

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, Austin Allegro said:

It's a bit like primitive tribes blaming a bad harvest on God's anger, etc.

I think I mentioned similar earlier. Pork sandwiches all round for a fortnight, er, when we find a culprit, assuming it will be edible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dunno. I do think like pressure cookers they  need to let some people let their steam out rather than let it all build Up to later in the summer.  I do feel that they’ll go for another ‘lockdown‘ in the winter And there are a few hints already that this might be coming.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It started because there's elections coming and this is how a summer of chaos starts.

Outside the USA, it is the result of frustrations of 10 years of financial repression of the young, with added frustration of lockdown pushing people over the edge.

I don't think it is about racism anywhere (although it was seeded from racism), although there's lots of racist tropes being banded about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Errol said:

It won't work.

The protestors have made the mistake in thinking that they are the majority or speak for the majority.

Lots of people are staying silent. Waiting.

This silence thing really isn't working for us. I wonder how many votes a White Lives Matter party would poll in a general election? It's not like white people have much representation in parliament anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, deathfunk said:

This silence thing really isn't working for us. I wonder how many votes a White Lives Matter party would poll in a general election? It's not like white people have much representation in parliament anymore.

Very few ,they think along the same lines as Labour and the Lib`s  ,they were going to walk the last election even after begin trounced they still can`t figure out why 

As long as they all think they speak for the country the same shit will happen 

 

Edited by Long time lurking

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Long time lurking said:

Very few ,they think along the same lines as Labour and the Lib`s  ,they were going to walk the last election even after begin trounced they still can`t figure out why 

As long as they all think they speak for the country the same shit will happen 

I worry that the left/globalists will try to pull some stunt like not allowing private voting in elections.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, goldbug9999 said:

I worry that the left/globalists will try to pull some stunt like not allowing private voting in elections.

They are pushing hard for postal votes in the upcoming US elections based on safety concerns

Don`t get me wrong they are a dangerous bunch but i think they will be in decline very soon as they are now the preachers , the youth generally rebel against their piers ,i can`t see them becoming as effective as Hitler in this day and age  

How many leftards do you see on the average council estate ? the middle classes are in a massive decline 

Edited by Long time lurking

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, goldbug9999 said:

churchil.PNG.f21e150c046e028b914ce4c6d68ae195.PNG

This is where we are at now.

'churchill was a racist'

This won't get better until white people can finally bring themselves to say 

'I don't care'

Jury's out on whether we'll ever get there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, goldbug9999 said:

churchil.PNG.f21e150c046e028b914ce4c6d68ae195.PNG

This is where we are at now.

These people would probably daub a statue of William Wilberforce with 'racist' slogans.

It's already been pointed out by several commentators that this lot have completely gone against Martin Luther King's call to judge by character rather than skin colour.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Boglet said:

'churchill was a racist'

This won't get better until white people can finally bring themselves to say 

'I don't care'

Jury's out on whether we'll ever get there.

I do not care, one civilization (the west) created the industrial revolution, international trade, flight, computers, space flight, freedom and law and order etc 

all civilizations are not equal and the west is the peak of it at the moment, hence why people want to come here, people are not looking to leave due to oppression.

quite frankly most of these people who are for the current BLM are the useful idiots who will be first against the wall once the powers behind it get their way  

Edited by ad_ceng

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Boglet said:

'churchill was a racist'

This won't get better until white people can finally bring themselves to say 

'I don't care'

Jury's out on whether we'll ever get there.

An alternative would be to ask they 'why was he a racist? Please give me an example of something he did that was racist'.

Most would be stumped.

A tiny minority would come up with something about him not wanting to give independence to India (which isn't quite true, he wanted it to have Dominion status) which would be easily trounced by reminding them that he fought very hard to prevent Nazi Germany (a racist party) from taking over Europe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Austin Allegro said:

An alternative would be to ask they 'why was he a racist? Please give me an example of something he did that was racist'.

Most would be stumped.

A tiny minority would come up with something about him not wanting to give independence to India (which isn't quite true, he wanted it to have Dominion status) which would be easily trounced by reminding them that he fought very hard to prevent Nazi Germany (a racist party) from taking over Europe.

You're making the mistake of thinking any of them have any interest in asking or answering questions.

I'm pretty sure that Winston Churchill was a racist. Would he have been OK with white people becoming a minority in the UK? I think not. Therefore, racist.

Everybody is stuck in the frame of trying to prove that they're less racist than the next person.

The only way to win is to not play.

Edited by Boglet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Boglet said:

You're making the mistake of thinking any of them have any interest in asking questions.

I'm pretty sure that Winston Churchill was a racist. Would he have been OK with white people becoming a minority in the UK? I think not. Therefore, racist.

Sadly probably true. 'Racist' is just another word for 'thought criminal'.

They would just say that a white person had no right to tell a black person what the definition of racism was, anyway.

Even if you called them out on that logic, like Laurence Fox bravely did on Question Time, they will still just screech 'racism' all the louder.

The only good thing, I think, is the more of this nonsense they come out with the more people can see through it - I hope.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Austin Allegro said:

These people would probably daub a statue of William Wilberforce with 'racist' slogans.

It's already been pointed out by several commentators that this lot have completely gone against Martin Luther King's call to judge by character rather than skin colour.

I could certainly see them spray painting him. 

statue-of-william-wilberforce.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Boglet said:

You're making the mistake of thinking any of them have any interest in asking or answering questions.

I'm pretty sure that Winston Churchill was a racist. Would he have been OK with white people becoming a minority in the UK? I think not. Therefore, racist.

Everybody is stuck in the frame of trying to prove that they're less racist than the next person.

The only way to win is to not play.

That’s a strange definition of racist. Not wanting to become a minority in your own country is preservation of a way of life and value structure.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, One percent said:

That’s a strange definition of racist. Not wanting to become a minority in your own country is preservation of a way of life and value structure.  

It's not my definition, it's society's current definition.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this