• Welcome to DOSBODS

     

    DOSBODS is free of any advertising.

    Ads are annoying, and - increasingly - advertising companies limit free speech online. DOSBODS Forums are completely free to use. Please create a free account to be able to access all the features of the DOSBODS community. It only takes 20 seconds!

     

whitevanman

Deluded Old Scrapper Birds On Dating Sites

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, sam1994 said:

I wonder if there’s a correlation between the supposed rise of ED and birds getting fatter.

Sure, porn is a contributor and is causing problems, but fatties can’t be helping.

 

Nah, it's all the estrogen mimicking hormones from the plastics.

Wrap your sandwiches in tinfoil instead of clingfilm.

xD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, gibbon said:

"it was for my sister" ah that old chesnut ;)

Regarding the make your profile respectable/put some effort in, remember the lookism lot blowing that idea out the water with their experiments, blokes who come across with DGAF attitude and with their tops off/posers got load more interest than the respectable brigade.

Never ask a woman for dating advice. Red pill 101.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Melchett said:

Never ask a woman for dating advice. Red pill 101.

This.

Imagine if you asked 1000 women 'would you ever fuck a man you met an hour earlier'.

999 would say no, no way, you have to build a relationship.

and yet all of us have stories of fucking a woman after a chance encounter.  And it's not all the same woman....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, wherebee said:

This.

Imagine if you asked 1000 women 'would you ever fuck a man you met an hour earlier'.

999 would say no, no way, you have to build a relationship.

and yet all of us have stories of fucking a woman after a chance encounter.  And it's not all the same woman....

Hopefully not.

xD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Wight Flight said:

Fuck me do people really think like that?

 

Does she start all her articles with a definition of a word - 'irrespective' in this case - before using it repeatedly? 

Only glanced through that. It should come with a red pill warning. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, spunko said:

https://www.refinery29.com/en-gb/2020/01/9244509/laurence-fox-anti-woke-meaning

The Dangerous Rise Of Men Who Won’t Date “Woke” Women

:Jumping:

Sensible action. 

Sales of dildos,  cats and boxes of cheap wine increase.  

More happy red pilled men.  

Confused woke intersectionalist wammin wonder why their gender studies degree and used up fanny ain't attractive 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, spunko said:

https://www.refinery29.com/en-gb/2020/01/9244509/laurence-fox-anti-woke-meaning

The Dangerous Rise Of Men Who Won’t Date “Woke” Women

:Jumping:

I'm not too fussed about what she's written, we're all entitled to an opinion but what I can't fathom is why all these articles come across like a big pile of words spewed onto a page in no particular order.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.rooshv.com/8-personal-defects-that-allowed-me-to-worship-fornication-for-18-years

Probably his best article since he's found god, even if the god bothering stuff isn't your cup of tea it's good he's finally pointing out how basing your existence on chasing pussy chips away at your soul. Still it is good timing for him, I doubt some guy who looks like a terrorist has been smashing it on Tinder lately... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Sgt Hartman said:

The sort of person that if you had the misfortune to find yourself sat next to at a party, you'd be making your excuses about 45 seconds later.

Nah. I would just say 'cheer up love' and enjoy the forthcoming rant.

(I don't get invited to many parties anymore)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Roger_Mellie said:

I'm not too fussed about what she's written, we're all entitled to an opinion but what I can't fathom is why all these articles come across like a big pile of words spewed onto a page in no particular order.

The thing that came across to me about the writer of this article is that she doesn’t seem to comprehend that other people, such as guys and people with views not aligned with her own, are also entitled to their views and preferences and don’t just exist as objects for her and her ilks gratification.

It’s  like we’re back in the 1950s but now the boot is on the intersectional nth wave feminists feet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Retweeted by a lady who slobs about in trackies, has a degree in English literature that is useless going by her salary and career, in debt, lives hand to mouth plus is expecting help from family with a house deposit, and finally; she doesn't like the larger man despite being size 18+.

Hmmmmm :S

twitter.jpg

Edited by maffo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Wight Flight said:

Fuck me do people really think like that?

The fact that Fox is a hideously white male is sentence 1, 2nd para. Got to get that in quick, as it frames the whole "this guy's ideas are evil" diatribe that follows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Sgt Hartman said:

She looks as miserable as arses. The sort of person that if you had the misfortune to find yourself sat next to at a party, you'd be making your excuses about 45 seconds later.

I don't think it's a coincidence that most of these people look like their dog died, it must weigh heavily on the conscience knowingly writing that sort of complete bollocks fully aware that some people will take it seriously.

She has the hollowed out look of an abortionist.  This is what you're probably picking up on, not a dead dog but dead offspring -- she's good looking enough that there will be men banging her, probably obnoxious execs, the type of male she probably professes to hate.  For all their shite talking women like this will be impulsive around the right man.

Then... abortion.

It's gotta eat at the soul though, even for a LARPing feminist. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, The Generation Game said:

Or, if you are looking to vent, 'cheer up love and enjoy the forthcoming rant.'

I do enjoy a good wind up of a cheerless numpty, whether they be left wing or right wing.

At the moment, the easiest are left wing.  When I was 20, the easiest were right wing.

I wonder if I'll ever have to bring back my 'everyone is a little bit gay - you might like it' line ever again?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 23/01/2020 at 12:18, Melchett said:

The thing that came across to me about the writer of this article is that she doesn’t seem to comprehend that other people, such as guys and people with views not aligned with her own, are also entitled to their views and preferences and don’t just exist as objects for her and her ilks gratification.

It’s  like we’re back in the 1950s but now the boot is on the intersectional nth wave feminists feet.

Those under the boot of white males in the 50s handled themselves better than the current crop of soy boys.

Shit test after shit test failed. No wonder wimmin are angry. It's like during WW2 when Singapore got captured. WTF? You Brits aren't superior after all...so fuck off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Got back on tinder, even though never had much luck on it.  The only upside are some quite entertaining profiles.  One today:

Photo 1: gym

Photo 2: dumbbells closeup

Photo 3: very overweight woman who maybe was at the gym, or maybe she wasn't.  I haven't noticed, I was laughing at that point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, The Masked Tulip said:

If I was this woman I would ditch him as a boyfriend or friend immediately.

https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=CMtlS_1579891397

She probably won't though. More likely to do that if he apologises profusely, grovels and begs for forgiveness. Strange creatures, women.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 22/01/2020 at 21:59, Wight Flight said:

Fuck me do people really think like that?

I’d love to know what I’m classed has because my intention is to never get married or live with a woman I simply have nothing to gain from

it ,will this be classed has an hate crime in a decade lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Melchett
      Another thread crosser. I honestly couldn’t decide which of the obvious threads to stick it in - maybe people with more time on their hands can cross post? 
      Anyway, if you care about your health and make sure you aren’t a bloated sack of lard you are apparently benefiting from thin privilege.
      The self delusion levels here are enormous. Let’s flip it. So, do people going into most places to eat (where you are never really sure if you are getting healthy food even if it looks like it might be) benefitting from fat privilege? 
      The gulf between reality and what these morons want to be reality is getting so great you’d need a vessel capable of faster than light travel to cross it.
      https://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/d5f083b6-d043-471a-94d0-9c3c5af97689
    • By Carl Fimble
      Write a piece attacking something (dosbods maybe even) in the style of a scummy unscrupulous journalist.
      Try to make it something you like, rather than something you actually want to attack.
      Might be interesting and/or amusing.
    • By Dave Bloke
      The EU has passed a mandatory regulation which gives them the power to take down any website they fancy with no judicial oversight
      https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/government/new-eu-consumer-protection-law-contains-a-vague-website-blocking-clause/
      the law was part of a supposed "consumer protection" law - although it actually waters down consumer protection.
       
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.