• Welcome to DOSBODS

    Please consider creating a free account to be able to access all the features of the DOSBODS community. It only takes 20 seconds!

Sign in to follow this  
gibbon

Why are the So-Called BBC such arseholes?

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Frank Hovis said:

Where do you start with this?

BBC has fake transexual vicar on Newsnight defending Treason May.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6445011/BBC-forced-deny-hiring-fake-vicar-Theresa-Mays-Brexit-deal-Newsnight.html

 

I assume this is a bloke who looks like a bloke and is wearing male clothing but who now identifies as a woman?

This is not a transexual IMPO. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, The Masked Tulip said:

 

I assume this is a bloke who looks like a bloke and is wearing male clothing but who now identifies as a woman?

This is not a transexual IMPO. 

'Miss Hayter is a pastor for the little-known Seeds for Wealth Ministries, which claims to 'help you realise, release and walk into your financial freedom in Christ'.'

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Which appears to be a FB page with only one person - Tranny Manny

There is a massive shift coming this year within the Body of Christ, foundations will be shaken, what we thought we knew is going to be tested, our Theology will be challenged. This is a good thing. We must never become complacent, we must be constantly looking forwards, earnestly seeking the will of God.
One of these 'forward thinking methods' is social media. Social media is fast replacing websites, nowadays we can live stream videos, preach the Gospel and connect with you all more readily via Facebook, Twitter, Periscope, even Whatsapp.
Social media is free, and as stewards of His resources we need to be careful how we use our finances.
To that end, this website will be closing.
Don't forget my book, 'Seeing God through the Camera Lens' is available to buy on Amazon or contact me here for your copy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, spygirl said:

'Miss Hayter is a pastor for the little-known Seeds for Wealth Ministries, which claims to 'help you realise, release and walk into your financial freedom in Christ'.'

 

So which is the fake bit? Fake trans? Fake vicar?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Frank Hovis said:

Where do you start with this?

BBC has fake transexual vicar on Newsnight defending Treason May.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6445011/BBC-forced-deny-hiring-fake-vicar-Theresa-Mays-Brexit-deal-Newsnight.html

Sounds exactly like the sort of fringe mental-case that the So-Called BBC just loves to give a platform to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vicargate is only trying to balance opinions.

Baron Razzall's daughter, the lovely Katie, had to apologise for not having an opposing guest to counter Chukka Umunna.

Why not simply hire actors every time ?

Sonia Sodha being lefty left left left on #Inside The Papers is far more damning of Esme Wren's approach to Newsnight.

That didn't make it into lefty Daily Mail.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted inthe Business section.

You know, for a new orgs that employs several 1000 they dont seem that good.

DWP forces carer to sell home or face jail to repay benefits

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-46454305

George Henderson, 59, from Leyland in Lancashire, looks after his 37-year-old son, John, who has mental health problems and is addicted to heroin.

George has cared for his son all of his life, without payment.

In August 2010, a Department for Work and Pensions official visited to ensure John was getting the right benefits.

While he was there, George asked whether he could claim carer's allowance.

The DWP official explained that there would be no merit in doing so, because George gaining carer's allowance would mean John losing the severe disability premium. The amounts were roughly the same.

However, George thought he could see a big advantage: it would help him manage his son's income so he could not spend it all on heroin.

"I would be in control of some of John's money. I would give him that money back on a daily basis, not the drug dealer taking it off him every fortnight when he was standing at the cash machine," he said.

What George did not realise - and the DWP official did not tell him - is that his work for a taxi firm, earning well over £120 a week, meant he was not entitled to carer's allowance.

George accepts that when applying for carer's allowance, he wrongly ticked the box that said he was unemployed. He can't remember why, but explains: "The only thing I can think is that I've ticked that box thinking the question is about my son. But it was a total mistake."

...

For more than six years, the Department for Work and Pensions failed to notice that George was paying tax on his earnings and had received £19,500 carer's allowance.

But then it decided to prosecute him for fraud over a mistake that cost it just 30p a week. George pleaded not guilty.

"As far as I was concerned, I never done anything wrong. I don't owe the DWP a penny. They took it off my son, gave it to me, who gave it back to my son as caring for him," he said.

"So the money that came off my son is the same amount of money as the DWP are actually trying to take back off me."

At his trial at Preston Crown Court in August, George was found guilty of fraud. He was fined, given a 32-week suspended sentence and electronically tagged. He began paying back the money in monthly instalments.

Last month, the DWP used the Proceeds of Crime Act to force George to sell his home and pay back all £20,900 of overpaid carer's allowance plus fines by 14 February. He faces seven months in jail for failing to do so.

 

 

https://www.lep.co.uk/news/crime/full-time-leyland-cabbie-fraudulently-claimed-19-000-for-caring-for-his-disabled-son-1-9294886

ecorder Joanne Woodward said: “When you made the initial application you made a declaration you were caring for your son for 35 hours a week and was not in employment when you were - you were working full time for Avacab on a permanent basis. “Between 2014 and 2016 you were earning between £15,000 and £18,000 per annum. “You didn’t declare these earnings at any point.


Serverly disabled my arse. Hes just a junky scamming the DLA. If his son was severaly disabled hed be getting more than 60/w.

 

The son scamming DLA for drug money.

The dads scamming carers allowance for 120/w scam. He cannot be caring for son 35h/w and workign 35h/w.

Pair of crooks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hilarious deluded comment by a BBC person on the radio to the effect - "we need the licence fee to compete with the likes of Netflix, etc because we are too small to do so otherwise"!  Why the eff are you trying to compete then, when you even know you can't, when no-one asked you to!  And BTW, you're failing to compete!

PS:  Any chance Joe Public will give me loads of money because I've just decided I want to be a millionaire!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Harley said:

Why the eff are you trying to compete then, when no-one asked you to!

Exactly.  It should be complementary to all commerical programming and not competing with it.

There are programmes or Radios 3 and 4 that would not work on a commercial station, local radio generally would not work commercially unless it's simple record playing and introducing them and local radio is much better than that.  All of those should continue.

Television?  It's actually hard to think of anything they do which isn't already covered, or would be picked up, by commercial stations.

So turn off the TV channels, R1, 2, and 5.  Combine R3, R4, and R4Extra into a single national station and leave local radio pretty much as is.

Oh and close their website which again would all be covered so much better by commercial sites.

That would be maybe then costing £300m or £5 per licence payer per year; and I would happily pay that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the So-Called BBC News is heavily padded out with shite this evening, burying real news with how bad sports advertising is and equating betting adverts to smoking, followed by the multi-billion pound industry of writing essays for bone idle students with cash.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Chewing Grass said:

the So-Called BBC News is heavily padded out with shite this evening, burying real news with how bad sports advertising is and equating betting adverts to smoking, followed by the multi-billion pound industry of writing essays for bone idle students with cash.

 

This shite story was a top read for a while and heavily pushed:

Why do people experience phantom rectum?

But if that's not your bag, then how about this for a top read:

Cloutlighting: From online 'pranks' to toxic social media trend

We’ve had preating, we’ve had orbiting - but this time, it’s something far more insidious. It’s called 'cloutlighting', which is a mix of social media 'clout' and 'gaslighting'.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Second top story on scottish news today

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-highlands-islands-46466996

Main Scottish sports story

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/46458854

 

 

 

Surely this utter brainwashing drivel must be having an impact on their reading figures ? the So-Called BBC has become a daily mash type parody of itself. But it's not meant to be funny....O.o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, null; said:

This shite story was a top read for a while and heavily pushed:

Why do people experience phantom rectum?

But if that's not your bag, then how about this for a top read:

Cloutlighting: From online 'pranks' to toxic social media trend

We’ve had preating, we’ve had orbiting - but this time, it’s something far more insidious. It’s called 'cloutlighting', which is a mix of social media 'clout' and 'gaslighting'.

 

 

I'm amazed the So-Called BBC still has a readership with this shite. It's become so niche and frankly ridiculous that it's becoming a parody. 

Today's guff includes "Ethnic minority candidates earn less than white colleagues".

I'm sorry but does anyone actually believe this bollocks? Are they honestly expecting me to believe that universities, the natural habitat of the SJW, discriminate financially on the grounds of race?

Really!? 

Apart from maybe a few isolated cases I refuse to believe that this is the general standard. If this is the sort of badly-researched garbage that the So-Called BBC insists on farting out then perhaps they should stick to reporting on 'Ghost Arse' or whatever the fuck it is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Sgt Hartman said:

I'm amazed the So-Called BBC still has a readership with this shite. It's become so niche and frankly ridiculous that it's becoming a parody. 

It seems obligatory to now have a blatant SJW slot on the daily R4 Today programme, the R4 World at One programme, and the R4 PM programme.  A recent "campaigning" piece on the Today programme was about paying surrogates as there are not enough of them, presumably for gay couples given that was who the interview was with.  They will soon take over the R4 Today's "Thought For Today" slot.  Correction, they mostly have.  And then you have more in between on the Woman's Hour, etc.  It's become some minority specialist channel preaching to its cohort, certainly a million miles away from its charter.  There's no way you all should be compelled to pay for this radical social engineering propaganda.  It's effectively no more than a campaigning political party.  And the worst part is it just alienates reasonable mainstraim support.  And annoys some of the very groups it purports to campaign for (e.g. my perfectly normal gay friends).  Next to Parliament, yet another unrepresenative, virtue signalling, "me me me", arrogant "we know better", head in the trough, organisation.  Hopefully we're going to run out of road on a lot of things around here.

Edited by Harley

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Harley said:

It seems obligatory to now have a blatant SJW slot on the daily R4 Today programme, the R4 World at One programme, and the R4 PM programme.  A recent "campaigning" piece on the Today programme was about paying surrogates as there are not enough of them, presumably for gay couples given that was who the interview was with.  They will soon take over the R4 Today's "Thought For Today" slot.  Correction, they mostly have.  And then you have more in between on the Woman's, etc.  It's become some minority specialist channel preaching to its cohort, certainly a million miles away form its charter.  There's no way you all should be compelled to pay for this radical social engineering propaganda.  And the worst part is it just alienates reasonable mainstraim support.  And annoys some of the very groups it purports to campaign for (e.g. my perfectly normal gay friends).  Next to Parliament, yet another unrepresenative, virtue signalling, "me me me", arrogant "we know better", head in the trough, organisation.  Hopefully we're going to run out of road on a lot of things around here.

When I was in my car, I would listen to the radio, switching mainly between R4, R5 and LBC. A year ago, I got a new car and insisted that it cam with dab radio so that I could get my fix of radio. 

I now drive along in silence or I listen to music. Every time I turn on the radio, doesn’t matter which channel, they are spouting some sjw propaganda. I last less than a minute, it has got so bad. 

Im sure it is not me who has changed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Harley said:

It seems obligatory to now have a blatant SJW slot on the daily R4 Today programme, the R4 World at One programme, and the R4 PM programme.  A recent "campaigning" piece on the Today programme was about paying surrogates as there are not enough of them, presumably for gay couples given that was who the interview was with.  They will soon take over the R4 Today's "Thought For Today" slot.  Correction, they mostly have.  And then you have more in between on the Woman's, etc.  It's become some minority specialist channel preaching to its cohort, certainly a million miles away from its charter.  There's no way you all should be compelled to pay for this radical social engineering propaganda.  It's effectively no more than a campaigning political party.  And the worst part is it just alienates reasonable mainstraim support.  And annoys some of the very groups it purports to campaign for (e.g. my perfectly normal gay friends).  Next to Parliament, yet another unrepresenative, virtue signalling, "me me me", arrogant "we know better", head in the trough, organisation.  Hopefully we're going to run out of road on a lot of things around here.

I shouldn't think the So-Called BBC cares anyway, as long as the money rolls in what does it matter if anyone's actually listening to them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, One percent said:

When I was in my car, I would listen to the radio, switching mainly between R4, R5 and LBC. A year ago, I got a new car and insisted that it cam with dab radio so that I could get my fix of radio. 

I now drive along in silence or I listen to music. Every time I turn on the radio, doesn’t matter which channel, they are spouting some sjw propaganda. I last less than a minute, it has got so bad. 

Im sure it is not me who has changed. 

#MeToo!  I stopped the TV (cancelled the licence) and thought I'd still have the radio (especially, as a R4 listener of about 45 years (started very young)!) but recently had to keep turning it off so many times I thought the buttons would wear out!  So now I just listen to my music, podcasts, or music only radio stations from around the world.  So no, they have changed, at an increasing rate, since a few short years ago.  I still remember the radio of the 1970's and all those great programmes.  How sad.

Edited by Harley

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, One percent said:

When I was in my car, I would listen to the radio, switching mainly between R4, R5 and LBC. A year ago, I got a new car and insisted that it cam with dab radio so that I could get my fix of radio. 

I now drive along in silence or I listen to music. Every time I turn on the radio, doesn’t matter which channel, they are spouting some sjw propaganda. I last less than a minute, it has got so bad. 

Im sure it is not me who has changed. 

My car has a USB socket so I download audio and podcasts from youtube and listen to that instead. I can't listen to R4 much anymore, it's just become a joke. It's ok if you have a listings guide and can carefully select programmes* to listen to, but if you just listen at random it will be SJW nonsense within minutes of tuning in.

*they have been remaking some lost Tony Hancock programmes which are quite good - mainly because they are using the original 1950s scripts instead of buggering about with them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.