Jump to content
DOSBODS
  • Welcome to DOSBODS

     

    DOSBODS is free of any advertising.

    Ads are annoying, and - increasingly - advertising companies limit free speech online. DOSBODS Forums are completely free to use. Please create a free account to be able to access all the features of the DOSBODS community. It only takes 20 seconds!

     

Trilateral commission


Recommended Posts

Never heard of this Rockefeller group before. Have a look through their details and membership. 

Their publication last summer has some rather :ph34r: sections. 

https://trilateral.org/page/12/executive-committee

https://trilateral.org/download/files/TC MEMBERSHIP LIST (MASTER 16 JULY 2020).pd

https://trilateral.org/download/files/brochure/Trilateral_brochure-2_7.pdf

"Greater connective tissue between elites and non-elites in the United States and other societies experiencing an increase in populism"

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, ashestoashes said:

at the end of the day other people are in charge of your life, so just take comfort in the small things in life like going down the pub.

I'm fully aware of this :D

It's just quite incredible that these groups meet up on a regular basis. CFR, bilderberg, WEF, trilateral Org etc....

Yet the MSM don't say a peep. That's not by accident. That's by design. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ccc said:

I'm fully aware of this :D

It's just quite incredible that these groups meet up on a regular basis. CFR, bilderberg, WEF, trilateral Org etc....

Yet the MSM don't say a peep. That's not by accident. That's by design. 

Its naive in the extreme to think the MSM would report on these groups.

I've previously pondered at what level in the media do people become 'knowing', that is when do they knowingly mislead under orders, not when do they sycophantically recant an ideological script.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, GBDamo said:

Its naive in the extreme to think the MSM would report on these groups.

I've previously pondered at what level in the media do people become 'knowing', that is when do they knowingly mislead under orders, not when do they sycophantically recant an ideological script.

I'm just saying they should. It's clear why they don't. It's by design. They don't want the majority knowing their lives aren't actually ruled by those they vote for. 

As for media I reckon very high up. But then they control everything beneath them. Simple. 

I'm certain that the likes of Piers Morgan etc are "nudged" on a regular basis to say specific things. It's pretty obvious. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking through the TC brochure and noticing the key words they seem to repeatedly use are "elite" and "democracy" few things become clear:

1) The most important thing to groups such as TC are to be relevant and influential.

2) Western democratic structures and institutions are rigid, they know how it works and they know how to pull strings. Republicans, Democrats, multinationals, WTO, WHO etc etc

3) Most significantly they know the media and they know what influence they have. As media moguls are very much part of this what can and cannot be said is very much tacitly agreed upon.

4) The biggest risk to the status quo they enjoy are China, Russia and Trump

5) Point 4 is reflected in how the "systems" relentlessly criticise these risks, and brainwash the public against them

6) BLM, SJW and Wokism are not a threat but a nice bit of bread and circus for the masses. A diversion for their mission to maintain controls on the levers. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ccc said:

I'm fully aware of this :D

It's just quite incredible that these groups meet up on a regular basis. CFR, bilderberg, WEF, trilateral Org etc....

Yet the MSM don't say a peep. That's not by accident. That's by design. 

WEF is the only one that is reported at all. There is superficial mention of the annual Davos meeting.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, eight said:

I think this is how David Miliband came to be connected to the Clintons. It's also the reason why such as Brexit is ultimately futile as it is these unelected tribes that decide how things are going to be. Look what the WHO has done to our lives these past months, for example.

At least Brexit makes them work a bit harder.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ashestoashes said:

at the end of the day other people are in charge of your life, so just take comfort in the small things in life like going down the pub.

Unless you live in Kent in which case you can't go to the pub right now.

I'll take comfort in the fact I can go to the shops, oh wait...

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, ccc said:

Keir Starmer is a member of the Trilateral group btw. 

Check out their publication from last summer. Then look at Starmers views and actions since then. 

They align rather impressively...:Old:

During the last Conservative leadership battle I couldn’t see why the MSM were quite so into the vacuous, talentless, charisma hole called Rory Stewart. Turns out he’s one of the U.K. politicos on the Trilateral Commission.

Says quite a lot about the false dichotomy of voting that these Trilateral Commission ideologues very nearly (openly) put their representatives and political bedfellows into the leaderships of both main parties.

What a total bell end!

Edited by Hail the Tripod
Link to post
Share on other sites

why do extremely rich people always want to own media organisations

thought in the US there was a CIA type person in every newsroom, that's what Jesse Ventura said when he became a governor

increasingly clear the UK media is controlled and not just during terrorist events

the trillionaires who really run things have decided the challenges the world faces are not going to get fixed using democracy and direct action is required, buckle up 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ashestoashes said:

why do extremely rich people always want to own media organisations

thought in the US there was a CIA type person in every newsroom, that's what Jesse Ventura said when he became a governor

increasingly clear the UK media is controlled and not just during terrorist events

the trillionaires who really run things have decided the challenges the world faces are not going to get fixed using democracy and direct action is required, buckle up 

I always fantasize about owning media organisations and I'm not rich. If I were a billionaire I'd buy them all up. Why? Control. If you're Jeff Bezos the last thing you want is the media writing stories about you, or trying to break up your obviously illegal monopoly. If you can exert a little control over the editor then you can control the news.

Then you can run for President, optionally.

(If Jeff didn't own the Washington Post then I wonder if Elizabeth Warren would have had more luck in convincing Americans that Amazon is a bad idea for most of them)

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, spunko said:

I always fantasize about owning media organisations and I'm not rich. If I were a billionaire I'd buy them all up. Why? Control. If you're Jeff Bezos the last thing you want is the media writing stories about you, or trying to break up your obviously illegal monopoly. If you can exert a little control over the editor then you can control the news.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, spunko said:

I always fantasize about owning media organisations and I'm not rich. If I were a billionaire I'd buy them all up.

You do own a (social) media organisation, DOSBODS.

Mind you I suppose the term organisation is pushing it a bit :ph34r:

Come to think of it social is also open to debate......

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Hail the Tripod said:

During the last Conservative leadership battle I couldn’t see why the MSM were quite so into the vacuous, talentless, charisma hole called Rory Stewart. Turns out he’s one of the U.K. politicos on the Trilateral Commission.

Says quite a lot about the false dichotomy of voting that these Trilateral Commission ideologues very nearly (openly) put their representatives and political bedfellows into the leaderships of both main parties.

What a total bell end!

This has been going on for decades. Denis Healey was marked out as a future Labour leader back in the 1950s when he first attended Bilderberg. In the end that bid failed. These organisations original purpose was to stop the western masses embracing communism though over time their modus operandi have come to bear an uncanny resemblance to the very thing they were supposed to be fighting. Personally I think they probably own a lot of the loony left as well since one of their main aim is to make hard core socialists unelectable. Their most recent trick has been to use feminism and identity politics to suppress all discussions of economics and class. I think it was GK Chesterton (ironically someone whose Catholic views harked back to the pre industrial era) who said that the abiding fear of the rich and powerful was that the poor would rise up and take their money from them.

Edited by Virgil Caine
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, ccc said:

I'm fully aware of this :D

It's just quite incredible that these groups meet up on a regular basis. CFR, bilderberg, WEF, trilateral Org etc....

Yet the MSM don't say a peep. That's not by accident. That's by design. 

It’s all a bit dull. Now if we could set TC against Bilderberg like Rangers against Celtic it might be a bit more interesting. Perhaps someone could set up the Davos Special Service Crew with its own calling cards to be distributed after the next bit of mayhem they cause. Actually looking at the Middle East they are probably ahead of the game there at inciting violence.

Edited by Virgil Caine
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would add that their actions over the last few months actually comes from a position of weakness (despite their apparent strength). China, Russia, Trump and other current affairs have all been imposing new ideologies and weakening the systems they rely on ie lamemedia, Brexit etc. Social media has exacerbated some of this. Expect more dramatic/ draconian censorship or outlandish behaviour (vote rigging?) if this trend continues.

Edited by desertorchid
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...