Jump to content
DOSBODS
  • Welcome to DOSBODS

     

    DOSBODS is free of any advertising.

    Ads are annoying, and - increasingly - advertising companies limit free speech online. DOSBODS Forums are completely free to use. Please create a free account to be able to access all the features of the DOSBODS community. It only takes 20 seconds!

     

Everyday Feminism - lunatic SJWness


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, JFK said:

Here we go, ensure pregnant men get equal pregnant care!|
... coz men give birth don't they. 
Got to make sure the equality is sorted out - so that there's equality for men and women giving birth ....


 

Insanity squared

Telling lies destroys your soul. People would do well to remember that when they hear themselves parroting the latest Woke commandments.

Edited by whitevanman
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Thought this might belong here. Apols if already posted.

The uncle is perfectly right. No child - boy or girl - should ever be told that they are a princess, or a prince. Nor should they ever be dressed-up and paraded as one - unless they actually

Posted Images

10 hours ago, whitevanman said:

Insanity squared

Telling lies destroys your soul. People would do well to remember that when they hear themselves parroting the latest Woke commandments.

Massive open goal missed by Julia there, interview starts with a row between the two of them when the guest says men can have periods.... yet later when pushed as to why the focus on tampon tax specifically, apparently its because it’s sexist.

Hmm how does that work if men can have periods?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
On 13/03/2020 at 21:48, whitevanman said:

 

Telling lies destroys your soul. People would do well to remember that when they hear themselves parroting the latest Woke commandments.

People need to realise that's half the point of a lot of this stuff. If they can get you to repeat lies, you're psychologically defeated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember the disgusting degeneracy that was this story, the fat mess and her bunch of beta orbiting cucks?
 

... what was it that has been noticed - that a lot of the so-called male feminists are actually sex pests/abusers ...

https://summit.news/2020/04/10/man-who-featured-in-5-person-polyamorous-relationship-charged-with-child-abuse/

 

Quote

CRIME

Man Who Featured in 5 Person Polyamorous Relationship Charged With Child Abuse

Infant suffered broken leg, arm and skull fractures during vicious attack.

92bdc8bce676fd1d053262a01af1a3b8?s=46&d=

Published

 5 hours ago 

on

 10 April, 2020
100420poly.jpg

A man who featured as one of the four male partners in a polyamorous relationship with a pregnant woman that received media attention in December has been charged with aggravated child abuse after the 5-week-old baby suffered multiple severe injuries.

22-year-old Ethan Baucom was one of the individuals shown in a Barcroft TV production which told the story of 20-year-old Tory Ojeda sharing her Jacksonville, Fla. with three of her four partners, including Baucom.

Ojeda revealed that she was marrying one of the men in the house, Travis, but that the father of her baby was another partner called Christopher.

“We’re all raising the baby together — so everyone’s Dad,” Ojeda said. “We’re all very, very excited to be raising a baby together.”

Christopher said he was looking forward to sharing father responsibilities with the other men in the house, commenting, “There is a lot of support between all of us dads and it’s something we can tag team.”

It has now been revealed that one of those men, Ethan Baucom, admitted to physically abusing the 5-week-old baby while babysitting the infant.

According to reports, the baby suffered a “broken leg, arm, ribs and skull fractures.”

The police report also reveals that Baucom, who told officers he needed to tell the truth,” heard a “pop” during the incident, which occurred on March 12th.

 

He told police he was “frustrated” at his inability to get any sleep during the babysitting and that this was the reason for carrying out the assault, further details of which are redacted in the official police report.

 

Authorities got involved when officers were called to a hospital on March 15 and told about the baby’s severe injuries as well as the the fact the infant had suffered “multiple brain bleeds.” Experts concluded the baby had been attacked at least three separate times.

The baby’s mother called the Florida Department of Children and Families five days after the incident took place. Baucom told her he had merely “squeezed” the child.

“I am so distraught that words cannot describe,” said the baby’s grandmother in response to the incident. “Oh the horror of all this! I’m so overwhelmed with pain, heartache and sorrow over this.”

The baby is expected to make a full recovery with no permanent damage. Baucom is now in jail.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, JFK said:

... what was it that has been noticed - that a lot of the so-called male feminists are actually sex pests/abusers ...

https://summit.news/2020/04/10/man-who-featured-in-5-person-polyamorous-relationship-charged-with-child-abuse/

The first thing that this reminded me of was a documentary about lions. The old male lion of a pride departs for some reason (dies? Vanquished by a younger male? Can't remember) and the first thing the new male does is kill the young cubs in the pride. The lionesses do nothing to protect them, not that there's much they could do. The new lion kills them be sure they're not his offspring - it's DNA, stoopid!

So I think that it's not simply child abuse, it's a primal impulse to reject children that are not your own. I believe you can get the same phenomenon with stepfathers. So for all his loving pretensions, his embrace of polyamory, his "modernity", he succumbs to a primal impulse...

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/04/2020 at 21:28, JFK said:

Indeed, this video makes that exact point and it's what I thought of too.
 

This fucking piece of shit better watch his back because if there is any justice in this world, this cunt will be shanked in the showers and be found lying, lifeless.
 

... let's not forget though the woman's position in all of this.  She has facilitate and a revelled in this situation of cuckery - the sheer degeneracy of a society that fucking allows and promotes this as 'progressive' etc just needs to crash and burn.

I blame the mum as much as I blame him. It's just not in a blokes DNA to look after someone else's baby, listen to it crying and not feel intense disgust and frustration. His mistake was not walking away from the whole sordid affair before his baser instincts got the better of him.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, whitevanman said:

I blame the mum as much as I blame him. It's just not in a blokes DNA to look after someone else's baby, listen to it crying and not feel intense disgust and frustration. His mistake was not walking away from the whole sordid affair before his baser instincts got the better of him.

and society.  

he is scum, but he's a product of a society which has given bad messaging to young men and women for decades now.  I'd happily shoot all of them, give the baby to a normal nuclear family with gender role models.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Leftism is a mental illness is a great meme, but it unsurprisingly turns out that it is actually true. Extraordinary data from the US states that 56 percent of young liberal women have been diagnosed with a mental illness.

https://vdare.com/articles/it-s-official-young-white-leftist-females-are-nuts

Quote

According to Pew Research Center data, 56% of Liberal females aged 18 to 29 have been diagnosed with a mental health condition, compared to 33.6% of Liberal males in this age band.

With this and corona-chan, how would one go about investing in the mental health industry?

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Stunley Andwin said:

Leftism is a mental illness is a great meme, but it unsurprisingly turns out that it is actually true. Extraordinary data from the US states that 56 percent of young liberal women have been diagnosed with a mental illness.

https://vdare.com/articles/it-s-official-young-white-leftist-females-are-nuts

With this and corona-chan, how would one go about investing in the mental health industry?

Much though I'm one of those sulking about anecdotal evidence elsewhere.... it does tally with anecdotal evidence.

 

That said, what percentage of centrist or right leaning women are nuts? 😆

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a cracker:

https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/oureconomy/coronavirus-crisis-shows-its-time-abolish-family/

"Nuclear households, it seems, are where we are all intuitively expected to retreat in order to prevent widespread ill-health. ‘Staying home’ is what is somehow self-evidentlysupposed to keep us well. But there are several problems with this, as anyone inclined to think about it critically (even for a moment) might figure out – problems one might summarize as the mystification of the couple-form; the romanticisation of kinship; and the sanitization of the fundamentally unsafe space that is private property.

How can a zone defined by the power asymmetries of housework (reproductive labor being so gendered), of renting and mortgage debt, land and deed ownership, of patriarchal parenting and (often) the institution of marriage, benefit health? Such standard homes are where, after all, everyone secretly knows the majority of earthly violence goes down: the W.H.O. calls domestic violence “the most widespread, but among the least reported human rights abuses."

Queer and feminized people, especially very old and very young ones, are definitionally not safe there: their flourishing in the capitalist home is the exception, not the rule."

and so on  ...

Edited by DocH
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, DocH said:

This is a cracker:

https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/oureconomy/coronavirus-crisis-shows-its-time-abolish-family/

"Nuclear households, it seems, are where we are all intuitively expected to retreat in order to prevent widespread ill-health. ‘Staying home’ is what is somehow self-evidentlysupposed to keep us well. But there are several problems with this, as anyone inclined to think about it critically (even for a moment) might figure out – problems one might summarize as the mystification of the couple-form; the romanticisation of kinship; and the sanitization of the fundamentally unsafe space that is private property.

How can a zone defined by the power asymmetries of housework (reproductive labor being so gendered), of renting and mortgage debt, land and deed ownership, of patriarchal parenting and (often) the institution of marriage, benefit health? Such standard homes are where, after all, everyone secretly knows the majority of earthly violence goes down: the W.H.O. calls domestic violence “the most widespread, but among the least reported human rights abuses."

Queer and feminized people, especially very old and very young ones, are definitionally not safe there: their flourishing in the capitalist home is the exception, not the rule."

and so on  ...

In other words - deviant families are a luxury in times of plenty, but human societies have evolved male/female/children family units as a survival mechanism for a very good reason....

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 04/04/2020 at 13:00, Boglet said:

People need to realise that's half the point of a lot of this stuff. If they can get you to repeat lies, you're psychologically defeated.

Yes, odd that the public aren't more aware of this as it I shall a repeated theme in popular entertainment. Just sitting here typing this I can think of specific episodes of many TV shows where cracking a main character under torture or interrogation by getting them to say a lie has been the whole point of the 45 minutes. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, DocH said:

This is a cracker:

https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/oureconomy/coronavirus-crisis-shows-its-time-abolish-family/

"Nuclear households, it seems, are where we are all intuitively expected to retreat in order to prevent widespread ill-health. ‘Staying home’ is what is somehow self-evidentlysupposed to keep us well. But there are several problems with this, as anyone inclined to think about it critically (even for a moment) might figure out – problems one might summarize as the mystification of the couple-form; the romanticisation of kinship; and the sanitization of the fundamentally unsafe space that is private property.

How can a zone defined by the power asymmetries of housework (reproductive labor being so gendered), of renting and mortgage debt, land and deed ownership, of patriarchal parenting and (often) the institution of marriage, benefit health? Such standard homes are where, after all, everyone secretly knows the majority of earthly violence goes down: the W.H.O. calls domestic violence “the most widespread, but among the least reported human rights abuses."

Queer and feminized people, especially very old and very young ones, are definitionally not safe there: their flourishing in the capitalist home is the exception, not the rule."

and so on  ...

“Blah, blah, blah, our whole society is demonstrably imperfect, blah, blah, blah, it must be torn down completely.”

”What is this supposedly better system you are proposing, and where can I see an example of it not being a hellish dystopia?”

 

Domestic violence is a terrible thing, but it’s hardly like it’s limited to traditional heterosexual couples. You don’t really get accurate figures but DV is off the scale in lesbian relationships. Even that “polyamorous” household the press were cheering recently ended up with the baby beaten half to death in the first three months. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 17/04/2020 at 08:01, Frank Hovis said:

Sargon made a very good point when discussing Emma Watson marrying herself or whatever it was she was pronouncing upon this time.

The primary reason for gender roles is that they make relationships and marriage work; in fulfilling those roles the marriage becomes advantageous to both so it lasts.

Without those gender roles the relationship will either not start or will rapidly fall apart.

Whilst it was a discussion about Emma Watson it applies equally to men. You don't be that soyboy, that gamester, useless at DIY, physically weak or unable to provide financially.

It's absolutely true about Emma Watson. Whilst her sexual score is high her gender score is near zero. The only relationship she could sustain would be a lesbian one where she gets to play the man.

I am not suggesting that she is a lezzer; rather that that is the corner into which her strident feminism has painted her.

She's a bang average actress who got lucky, can't come to terms with the fact she got lucky and the roles dried up - at least of the type her 'talent' deserved.

patriarchy to the rescue. Easy.

Edited by maynardgravy
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, maynardgravy said:

She's a bang average actress who got lucky, can't come to terms with the fact she got lucky and the roles dried up - at least of the type her 'talent' deserved.

patriarchy to the rescue. Easy.

Being rich is great but it only counts for so much when you've peaked 5-10 years ago, have an inflated ego from those days, and have another 40 plus years of life to try and figure out how to spend 8 hours a day without a job, partner or children.

Edited by JoeDavola
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, JoeDavola said:

Being rich is great but it only counts for so much when you've peaked 5-10 years ago, have an inflated ego from those days, and have another 40 plus years of life to try and figure out how to spend 8 hours a day without a job, partner or children.

Welcome to my world Joe!

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 17/04/2020 at 08:01, Frank Hovis said:

Sargon made a very good point when discussing Emma Watson marrying herself or whatever it was she was pronouncing upon this time.

The primary reason for gender roles is that they make relationships and marriage work; in fulfilling those roles the marriage becomes advantageous to both so it lasts.

Without those gender roles the relationship will either not start or will rapidly fall apart.

Whilst it was a discussion about Emma Watson it applies equally to men. You don't be that soyboy, that gamester, useless at DIY, physically weak or unable to provide financially.

It's absolutely true about Emma Watson. Whilst her sexual score is high her gender score is near zero. The only relationship she could sustain would be a lesbian one where she gets to play the man.

I am not suggesting that she is a lezzer; rather that that is the corner into which her strident feminism has painted her.

Says the bloke who has never been married. As a woman, it was the most stupidest decision I ever made. Sorry Frank. I ain’t going there again. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...