• Welcome to DOSBODS

     

    DOSBODS is free of any advertising.

    Ads are annoying, and - increasingly - advertising companies limit free speech online. DOSBODS Forums are completely free to use. Please create a free account to be able to access all the features of the DOSBODS community. It only takes 20 seconds!

     

Frank Hovis

Everyday Feminism - lunatic SJWness

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, The Masked Tulip said:

Watch his hands carefully. He does something to her neck that gets her jerking and then basically the climax touch is on her anus, having touched her back on the way there.

 

PUA then 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, The Masked Tulip said:

Watch his hands carefully. He does something to her neck that gets her jerking and then basically the climax touch is on her anus, having touched her back on the way there.

I would like to watch the whole thing to know what he's claiming to do. She's reacting as if to some kind of hypnotic suggestion. Either that or she's got vibrating love eggs inside her O.o 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, LC1 said:

I would like to watch the whole thing to know what he's claiming to do. She's reacting as if to some kind of hypnotic suggestion. Either that or she's got vibrating love eggs inside her O.o 

 

@LC1 - we clearly think alike.

It crossed my mind whether she has a Gorean slavegirl brand on one thigh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Errol said:

The opposite of SJW. Quick; burn the witch!!

 

Vladimir Putin says 'marriage is a union of a man and woman' as he declares support for 'traditional family values'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8000777/Vladimir-Putin-says-marriage-union-man-woman.html#comments

If honest 99% of people would agree with him.

Yet the incessant lobying and media message is that by thinking in this way you are being evil and nasty towards homosexuals who want to get married and it is your prejudices that are stopping them.

Now most people IME have no dsilike of homosexuals and that media lobbying is playing upon this by suggesting that if you don't agree with gay marriage then it must be because you hate gay people.

So as you don't hate gay people at all you feel guilty about opposing gay marriage and go along with it.

It's quite clever how they do this: getting you to agree with something with which you don't agree by explicitly linking it to something with which you are fine. 

 

Personally: Fine with people being gay, fine with their having civil partnerships, disagree with gay marriage because that is a specific state of partnership for a man and a woman.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Frank Hovis said:

If honest 99% of people would agree with him.

Yet the incessant lobying and media message is that by thinking in this way you are being evil and nasty towards homosexuals who want to get married and it is your prejudices that are stopping them.

Now most people IME have no dsilike of homosexuals and that media lobbying is playing upon this by suggesting that if you don't agree with gay marriage then it must be because you hate gay people.

So as you don't hate gay people at all you feel guilty about opposing gay marriage and go along with it.

It's quite clever how they do this: getting you to agree with something with which you don't agree by explicitly linking it to something with which you are fine. 

 

Personally: Fine with people being gay, fine with their having civil partnerships, disagree with gay marriage because that is a specific state of partnership for a man and a woman.

You have to see the other side: for Putin in generally homophobic Russia, it's just an easy way to score some points. He is not saying it because Russia has gone all SJW, it's the exact opposite. That statement is the equivalent of pro-sjw leftie shit so popular here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Bear Hug said:

You have to see the other side: for Putin in generally homophobic Russia, it's just an easy way to score some points. He is not saying it because Russia has gone all SJW, it's the exact opposite. That statement is the equivalent of pro-sjw leftie shit so popular here

Yes exactly.

Now if he actually questioned the Koran and Islam specifically, which would cause huge political problems for him, then we know he actually was anti-woke.  

He doesn't, as he doesn't want to risk his middle eastern adventures, which means he is in the same vein as the soft cocks in the west (albeit with a bit more murder and stealing of money)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, wherebee said:

Now if he actually questioned the Koran and Islam specifically, which would cause huge political problems for him, then we know he actually was anti-woke.  

He doesn't, as he doesn't want to risk his middle eastern adventures, which means he is in the same vein as the soft cocks in the west (albeit with a bit more murder and stealing of money)

He won't do that because Muslims have always been an integral part of Russia. That weren't let into the country or somehow admitted due to immigration etc. They have always been there and are an integral part of Russia. Russia has 8 distinct ethnic groups that have always been there. It's completely unlike the Western nations who have permitted Muslims to grow a presence in their nations and are now afraid to say anything about it.

It's completely different from  the Western situation.

Edited by Errol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Errol said:

He won't do that because Muslims have always been an integral part of Russia. had their lands conquered by Russia from the 16th to the 19th century.

I can't imagine there were too many in Novgorod or the Muscovy or Tver principalities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-51485570

Quote

Glastonbury organiser Emily Eavis says the festival has to achieve a gender balanced line-up as soon as it can.

"Our future has to be 50/50," she tells Radio 1 Newsbeat.

"It's a challenge. Everyone's finding it hard - but the acts are there," she says, adding that past Glastonbury line-ups have "always been male-heavy".

Her comments come after criticism that many festivals don't have enough female or female-fronted acts on their line-ups.

Emily was named godlike genius at the NME Awards in London, where Glastonbury was named best festival in the world.

"When I look back at past Glastonbury line-ups, I realised it's always been male heavy.

"Unless you consciously change and really address it, then it will stay the same because we're always going to be flooded with male acts."

Insane.  And hundreds of thousands of people will continue to fund this craziness for a while as it's oversubscribed every year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Bear Hug said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-51485570

Insane.  And hundreds of thousands of people will continue to fund this craziness for a while as it's oversubscribed every year.

Nothing I love more than a wealthy hereditary landowner banging on about how equality of opportunity is their guiding principle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 17/02/2020 at 00:14, Bear Hug said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-51485570

Insane.  And hundreds of thousands of people will continue to fund this craziness for a while as it's oversubscribed every year.

equality of outcome leads to no outcome at all. Making women the priority means is demeaning to the women who DO make it.  Lefties HATE women.

Edited by BLOOLOO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, JFK said:

Although not strictly SJW feminism this goes under the 'tidy women destroying their bodies with shite tattoos '

Look at the state of that

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-8013291/Victoria-Pendleton-joins-Liam-Payne-red-carpet-Laureus-World-Sports-Awards.html

Bloody hell.

24846130-8013291-image-m-6_1581959675989

I assumed she was reasonably classy, though that was going on nothing more than her name, but obviously not then.  Chavscum at heart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Frank Hovis said:

Bloody hell.

24846130-8013291-image-m-6_1581959675989

24846130-8013291-image-m-6_1581959675989

I assumed she was reasonably classy, though that was going on nothing more than her name, but obviously not then.  Chavscum at heart.

Couldn't have put it more succinctly. 

Utterly grim and low class 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, JFK said:

Couldn't have put it more succinctly. 

Utterly grim and low class 

Shes an absolute mentalist with more red flags than... well, you get the idea. Her highly disruptive behaviours in the British Olympic cycling team is a matter of record. If it hadnt been for the fact she was winning medals they'd have surely dumped her. Add to that the clear difficulties shes had transitioning to her post sporting career life. 

Suicide by 50 I reckon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 14/02/2020 at 09:59, Frank Hovis said:

If honest 99% of people would agree with him.

Yet the incessant lobying and media message is that by thinking in this way you are being evil and nasty towards homosexuals who want to get married and it is your prejudices that are stopping them.

Now most people IME have no dsilike of homosexuals and that media lobbying is playing upon this by suggesting that if you don't agree with gay marriage then it must be because you hate gay people.

So as you don't hate gay people at all you feel guilty about opposing gay marriage and go along with it.

It's quite clever how they do this: getting you to agree with something with which you don't agree by explicitly linking it to something with which you are fine. 

 

Personally: Fine with people being gay, fine with their having civil partnerships, disagree with gay marriage because that is a specific state of partnership for a man and a woman.

This is called the 'Motte and Bailey' debate tactic. Leftists use this all the time. You'll see it often when you know what it is.

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Motte_and_bailey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Melchett said:

Shes an absolute mentalist with more red flags than... well, you get the idea. Her highly disruptive behaviours in the British Olympic cycling team is a matter of record. If it hadnt been for the fact she was winning medals they'd have surely dumped her. Add to that the clear difficulties shes had transitioning to her post sporting career life. 

Suicide by 50 I reckon.

What did she do then that was batshit mental? Can't be worse than battering her younger lover while he slept..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Boglet said:

This is called the 'Motte and Bailey' debate tactic. Leftists use this all the time. You'll see it often when you know what it is.

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Motte_and_bailey

Is that not similar to a straw-man? - An argument style that I can explain in my head, but find impossible to verbalise to someone.

Incidentally I once worked for an American business that kept referring to a "skeleton powerpoint deck" (to mean a structure and some base facts/flow etc) as a "straw-man deck".

They would also say things like "this slide is talking to this point, and this slide is talking to that point" which used to drive me fucking potty.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Thombleached said:

What did she do then that was batshit mental? Can't be worse than battering her younger lover while he slept..

I didn't realise they were in competition?

Fucking one of the main coaches, against the rules and with associated fall out, including him losing his job, was the best known thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, JFK said:

Couldn't have put it more succinctly. 

Utterly grim and low class 

Fuck off... She's well in the 'would bang' category. Nothing grim about her and nothing wrong with being low class.

Edited by Roger_Mellie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.