Jump to content
DOSBODS
  • Welcome to DOSBODS

     

    DOSBODS is free of any advertising.

    Ads are annoying, and - increasingly - advertising companies limit free speech online. DOSBODS Forums are completely free to use. Please create a free account to be able to access all the features of the DOSBODS community. It only takes 20 seconds!

     

If you tolerate this ..... then your children will be next.......


Jesus Wept
 Share

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, Stuey said:

No more teenage pregnancies...

The HPV vaccine had already seen to that.

  • Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jesus Wept
1 hour ago, Stuey said:

Oh fucking dear.

But look on the bright side.

No more teenage pregnancies...

 

1 hour ago, tlc said:

The HPV vaccine had already seen to that.


Out of curiosity I looked up ‘conceptions per 1000 15-17yr olds U.K. by year:

 

F62F142E-6779-4E09-909E-0B172843337F.thumb.jpeg.f83aa3f35502d76bcb455020e41c08f7.jpeg
 

Now what year was the HPV children’s ‘mandatory’ vaccination programme brought in in the U.K. ? 
 

2008 ?

0957A6C8-5B56-4E03-9E3E-FE77E3716AE3.thumb.jpeg.1347547e14fdf098a151db1e06d75fb5.jpeg
 

Yep .... 2008......

F10181BC-18B8-4CFB-BA71-01B8B84F7A17.thumb.jpeg.784b88a3d50cac17bd7b7fa79a103b43.jpeg

 

 

  • Agree 1
  • Informative 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Vendetta said:

 


Out of curiosity I looked up ‘conceptions per 1000 15-17yr olds U.K. by year:

 

F62F142E-6779-4E09-909E-0B172843337F.thumb.jpeg.f83aa3f35502d76bcb455020e41c08f7.jpeg
 

Now what year was the HPV children’s ‘mandatory’ vaccination programme brought in in the U.K. ? 
 

2008 ?

0957A6C8-5B56-4E03-9E3E-FE77E3716AE3.thumb.jpeg.1347547e14fdf098a151db1e06d75fb5.jpeg
 

Yep .... 2008......

F10181BC-18B8-4CFB-BA71-01B8B84F7A17.thumb.jpeg.784b88a3d50cac17bd7b7fa79a103b43.jpeg

 

 

Yep I posted about the HPV beginning in 2008 and teenage pregnancies falling since.

It's like teenagers thought I've got the vaccine, sex is no longer a risk to getting cervical cancer but just to be safe I'll behave like a nun.

  • Agree 1
  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

wherebee
On 30/05/2021 at 00:43, tlc said:

Yep I posted about the HPV beginning in 2008 and teenage pregnancies falling since.

It's like teenagers thought I've got the vaccine, sex is no longer a risk to getting cervical cancer but just to be safe I'll behave like a nun.

if you factor in the growth in muslim and and chinese/indian populations (no teenage pregnancies reported there), plus the documented rise in kids not having sex at all in teenage years (well documented elsewhere in DOSBODS) I am not surprised by this at all.

Now, if you had two data points, one showing unvacced kids and one showing vacced kids and different conception rates, then we might be onto something.

  • Agree 2
  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OurDayWillCome
26 minutes ago, wherebee said:

the growth in muslim and and chinese/indian populations

They may now be allowed to have more than one child, but they are still on the whole happy with having just the one. Even since the policy started in the late 70’s families from villages have always been allowed more than one, even if they move to a city - at the most they have two.

  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

wherebee
11 minutes ago, OurDayWillCome said:

They may now be allowed to have more than one child, but they are still on the whole happy with having just the one. Even since the policy started in the late 70’s families from villages have always been allowed more than one, even if they move to a city - at the most they have two.

no, I mean in the UK these ethnic groups are a sizeable and growing part of the UK population.  And they don't fuck about - well, the girls don't, anyway.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OurDayWillCome
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, wherebee said:

no, I mean in the UK these ethnic groups are a sizeable and growing part of the UK population.  And they don't fuck about - well, the girls don't, anyway.

Chinese girls?! I don’t think you have that correct. Slightly confused, are you saying UK Chinese are having large families? To be honest, all the Sikh families I know also tend to only have two sprogs. Now the Muslim contingent - yep, breeding for Allah.

Edited by OurDayWillCome
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

wherebee
9 minutes ago, OurDayWillCome said:

Chinese girls?! I don’t think you have that correct. Slightly confused, are you saying UK Chinese are having large families? To be honest, all the Sikh families I know also tend to only have two sprogs. Now the Muslim contingent - yep, breeding for Allah.

no, I was using english to explain quite a simple concept: native brit girls are declining as a proportion of the population as ethnic mix changes.  non-native girls fuck a lot less than native brit girls in the teenage years, due to parental and societal controls, so a decline in teenage pregnancies is entirely in line with demographic changes.

would you like that in french or arabic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OurDayWillCome
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, wherebee said:

would you like that in french or arabic?

That's where you were making a really confusing point by adding in Muslim girls. As For french girls, I think the hairy armpits and drying used tampons on radiators tends to put off the boys.

*Edit: Muslim girls are still breeding in high numbers, that’s where the confusion came from. Thanks for the wanker reply though.

Edited by OurDayWillCome
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Democorruptcy
On 29/05/2021 at 07:59, Vendetta said:

Out of curiosity I looked up ‘conceptions per 1000 15-17yr olds U.K. by year:

 

F62F142E-6779-4E09-909E-0B172843337F.thumb.jpeg.f83aa3f35502d76bcb455020e41c08f7.jpeg
 

Now what year was the HPV children’s ‘mandatory’ vaccination programme brought in in the U.K. ? 

2008 ?

Yep .... 2008......

Facebook started in 2004. Social media is anti-social. The younger generation are on their devices at home, instead of meeting someone in the flesh.

  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alonso Quijano
Posted (edited)

The Pfizer 'vaccine' approved and safe for 12-15 year olds.

1827999830_ChildrenPfizerapproval.png.415377cac08bbe521b97d22551149f04.png

WTF!

 

Oops! Covered in Do Not Vaccinate thread.

Edited by Alonso Quijano
  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A tremendous # on the lung
2 minutes ago, Alonso Quijano said:

The Pfizer 'vaccine' approved and safe for 12-15 year olds.

1827999830_ChildrenPfizerapproval.png.415377cac08bbe521b97d22551149f04.png

WTF!

Absolutely disgusting 

  • Agree 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Long-game
1 minute ago, A tremendous # on the lung said:

Absolutely disgusting 

Utter bastards that's all

  • Agree 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Austin Allegro
On 29/05/2021 at 15:43, tlc said:

Yep I posted about the HPV beginning in 2008 and teenage pregnancies falling since.

It's like teenagers thought I've got the vaccine, sex is no longer a risk to getting cervical cancer but just to be safe I'll behave like a nun.

I assumed it was connected with the rise in the Muslim population and other immigrants who for some odd reason don't think very highly of teen pregnancies.

Cue jokes about Muhammed's wife etc.

 

  • Lol 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jesus Wept

No way will my kids get vaccinated. 

This is about ‘control’ and profit. 

I can’t believe this has been allowed to happen.

Big consequences will be seen in a few years time. 

 

AD1EC2FB-512B-4838-9456-9A97C3F9C23C.jpeg

  • Agree 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Democorruptcy said:

Looking at the England/Wales ONS stats for "died WITH covid mentioned on the death certificate", that's obviously not OF covid, they could have died of cancer etc.

Since the pandemic started these are the age groups of each of those deaths

    2020 + 2021   Age
0.00% << 4 >> <1
0.00% << 4 >> 1-4
0.00% << 5 >> 5-9
0.01% << 17 >> 10-14
0.01% << 26 >> 15-19
0.04% << 71 >> 20-24
0.08% << 150 >> 25-29
0.16% << 296 >> 30-34
0.30% << 542 >> 35-39
0.50% << 921 >> 40-44
0.93% << 1,696 >> 45-49
1.74% << 3,181 >> 50-54
2.93% << 5,366 >> 55-59
4.46% << 8,166 >> 60-64
6.19% << 11,343 >> 65-69
9.28% << 16,999 >> 70-74
13.10% << 23,995 >> 75-79
17.65% << 32,325 >> 80-84
20.25% << 37,089 >> 85-89
22.35% << 40,933 >> 90+
100.00%   183,129    

The idea that children need vaccinating against covid is preposterous.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/weeklyprovisionalfiguresondeathsregisteredinenglandandwales

 

It is even worse than that table suggests -- the number of people in each age group is roughly the same in the population until the >75 groups, where it starts to plummet.  This whole thing has been about saving the old (and to a lesser extent other vulnerable) from covid -- and instead of saying 'thanks for the vaccine you can unlock now' they've insisted that all the people that sacrificed 12 months of freedom for the old & vulnerable get jabbed with something with unknown medium- and long-term consequences.  

74e8afc8.png

What drives me even madder is that I'm sure that if this was a disease of the young, the older age groups would have locked down down the young and then carried on as normal.  

  • Agree 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wight Flight
3 minutes ago, Whowhywhen? said:

Today's vax authorisation for children has had a big effect on me.  I wasn't anticipating my reaction to this even though I knew it was inevitable.

I haven't been this angry in a long while.

Agreed. Mrs Flight's Tourettes has returned with a vengeance.

Not sure I can trust her out for dinner this evening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Battenberg

I’ve come to the conclusion that I can no longer worry about what other people decide to do with their children. If they’re really stupid enough to get their children vaccinated at this stage in the game then there’s no helping them. 
 

 

  • Agree 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

George Dawes
15 minutes ago, Whowhywhen? said:

Today's vax authorisation for children has had a big effect on me.  I wasn't anticipating my reaction to this even though I knew it was inevitable.

I haven't been this angry in a long while.

This was predictable back in December, I told the wife they would come for the kids eventually. No chance will this be happening to my kids, but it’s the peer pressure I fear, they can be nasty in high school if you don’t fit in with the crowd. 
 

ive had two blue letters now, I feel so special. Oddly the wife hasn’t had any and we’re same age.

  • Agree 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One percent
4 minutes ago, Battenberg said:

I’ve come to the conclusion that I can no longer worry about what other people decide to do with their children. If they’re really stupid enough to get their children vaccinated at this stage in the game then there’s no helping them. 
 

 

This. In spades. Parents do not have to agree 

  • Agree 1
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vacant
38 minutes ago, Democorruptcy said:

Looking at the England/Wales ONS stats for "died WITH covid mentioned on the death certificate", that's obviously not OF covid, they could have died of cancer etc.

Since the pandemic started these are the age groups of each of those deaths

    2020 + 2021   Age
0.00% << 4 >> <1
0.00% << 4 >> 1-4
0.00% << 5 >> 5-9
0.01% << 17 >> 10-14
0.01% << 26 >> 15-19
0.04% << 71 >> 20-24
0.08% << 150 >> 25-29
0.16% << 296 >> 30-34
0.30% << 542 >> 35-39
0.50% << 921 >> 40-44
0.93% << 1,696 >> 45-49
1.74% << 3,181 >> 50-54
2.93% << 5,366 >> 55-59
4.46% << 8,166 >> 60-64
6.19% << 11,343 >> 65-69
9.28% << 16,999 >> 70-74
13.10% << 23,995 >> 75-79
17.65% << 32,325 >> 80-84
20.25% << 37,089 >> 85-89
22.35% << 40,933 >> 90+
100.00%   183,129    

The idea that children need vaccinating against covid is preposterous.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/weeklyprovisionalfiguresondeathsregisteredinenglandandwales

 

I make that about 35 people 15yrs and younger.

How many will be sacrificed before it's considered a zero sum game?

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...