Jump to content
DOSBODS
  • Welcome to DOSBODS

     

    DOSBODS is free of any advertising.

    Ads are annoying, and - increasingly - advertising companies limit free speech online. DOSBODS Forums are completely free to use. Please create a free account to be able to access all the features of the DOSBODS community. It only takes 20 seconds!

     

Covid-19 Reverse Engineered - a hive mind retrospective


Recommended Posts

Chewing Grass

This thread needs to be a hive mind effort, March/April 2020 was particularly interesting for the policy change which has been hidden by time along with the deliberate mis-information that was peddled and the insistence that the virus was a bat/pangolin/fish (choose any animal) from the wet market.

Dates are important along with references as you can see retrospectively the cards being dealt and played.

There are big gaps so feel free to copy, edit and replace the piece below but stick to the correct dates, chronological order and reference-able fact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

July 11th 2019 Fort Detrick, 3 dead & 18 hospitalised and a further 54 ill (at a care home?), CDC cannot identify pathogen.

https://www.military.com/daily-news/2019/11/24/cdc-inspection-findings-reveal-more-about-fort-detrick-research-suspension.html

 

September 2019 (Wall Street Journal / Reuters) Italian Naional Cancer Institute retrospectively examined blood samples from Milan lung cancer screening trials and found 111/959 or 12% tested positive for Covid anti-bodies. 14% of the samples were drawn in September.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-italy-timing/coronavirus-emerged-in-italy-earlier-than-thought-italian-study-shows-idUSKBN27V0KF

 

November 2019 several researchers hospitalised from the Wuhan Cat4 Laboratory

 

December 2019 174 cases in Wuhan

 

December 27th 2019 first case found in France.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-19-was-spreading-in-china-before-first-confirmed-cases-fresh-evidence-suggests-11613730600

 

February 2020, straight off the blocks Dr Daszak gets colleagues to sign a letter to The Lancet

 

The Lancet letter had been organised and drafted by Peter Daszak, president of the EcoHealth Alliance of New York. Dr Daszak’s organisation funded coronavirus research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. This arguably acute conflict of interest was not declared to The Lancet’s readers. To the contrary, the letter concluded: “We declare no competing interests.”

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/health-fitness/body/origins-covid-did-virus-mutate-naturally-thewuhan-lab-really/

 

9/13th March (can’t work which) Patrick Vallance R4 Today, Herd Immunity by September 2020 is government policy.

 

March 23rd first UK lockdown

 

March 27th Johnson tests positive

 

April 2020 Trump attributes virus to Wuhan Lab leak and is accused of being wacist.

 

1st May Trump stands by statement that Virus originated ‘in a Lab’.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-52496098

 

18th May Sorensen/Susrad/Dalgleish Paper

 

4th June Sir Richard Dearlove (former MI6) agrees with paper and states the virus was grown ia a lab.

 

18th June Sorenson/Susrad/Dalgleish thoroughly dissed by fullfact.org

https://fullfact.org/health/richard-dearlove-coronavirus-claims/

 

21st July Trump tweets about Chinavirus and says ‘it is patriotic to wear a mask’, thus subconsciously confirming its ‘military origin’.

 

24th December 2020 – PCR tests being run at 45 cycles thus promoting 97% false positives (there is a ref for the 97%). 45 cycles found from FOI request.

https://www.plymouthhospitals.nhs.uk/foi-disclosures-2020-21/disclosures-december-2020-4520/

 

May 2021 – PCR tests now being done at 25 cycles for the vaccinated (this was a few days ago, need ref).

  • Informative 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
The Masked Tulip

Here is a timeline from the South China Morning Post. It starts over a month after their first report, which I can no longer find now.

https://amp.scmp.com/yp/article/3103458/coronavirus-timeline-outbreak-related-deadly-sars-november-april

 

Here is a timeline from the South China Morning Post. It starts over a month after their first report, which I can no longer find now.

https://amp.scmp.com/yp/article/3103458/coronavirus-timeline-outbreak-related-deadly-sars-november-april

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Chewing Grass

 

Sorted the retirement place out.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

July 11th 2019 Fort Detrick, 3 dead & 18 hospitalised and a further 54 ill at Greenspring Retirement Community, Virginia, CDC cannot identify pathogen. Viral outbreak with "respiratory symptoms ranging from upper respiratory symptoms (cough) to pneumonia" in the last 11 days at Greenspring Retirement Community in Springfield.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/respiratory-outbreak-investigated-retirement-community-54-residents-fall/story?id=64275865

https://www.military.com/daily-news/2019/11/24/cdc-inspection-findings-reveal-more-about-fort-detrick-research-suspension.html

 

September 2019 (Wall Street Journal / Reuters) Italian Naional Cancer Institute retrospectively examined blood samples from Milan lung cancer screening trials and found 111/959 or 12% tested positive for Covid anti-bodies. 14% of the samples were drawn in September.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-italy-timing/coronavirus-emerged-in-italy-earlier-than-thought-italian-study-shows-idUSKBN27V0KF

 

November 2019 several researchers hospitalised from the Wuhan Cat4 Laboratory

 

December 2019 174 cases in Wuhan

 

December 27th 2019 first case found in France.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-19-was-spreading-in-china-before-first-confirmed-cases-fresh-evidence-suggests-11613730600

 

February 2020, straight off the blocks Dr Daszak gets colleagues to sign a letter to The Lancet

 

The Lancet letter had been organised and drafted by Peter Daszak, president of the EcoHealth Alliance of New York. Dr Daszak’s organisation funded coronavirus research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. This arguably acute conflict of interest was not declared to The Lancet’s readers. To the contrary, the letter concluded: “We declare no competing interests.”

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/health-fitness/body/origins-covid-did-virus-mutate-naturally-thewuhan-lab-really/

 

9/13th March (can’t work which) Patrick Vallance R4 Today, Herd Immunity by September 2020 is government policy.

 

March 23rd first UK lockdown

 

March 27th Johnson tests positive

 

April 2020 Trump attributes virus to Wuhan Lab leak and is accused of being wacist.

 

1st May Trump stands by statement that Virus originated ‘in a Lab’.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-52496098

 

18th May Sorensen/Susrad/Dalgleish Paper

 

4th June Sir Richard Dearlove (former MI6) agrees with paper and states the virus was grown ia a lab.

 

18th June Sorenson/Susrad/Dalgleish thoroughly dissed by fullfact.org

https://fullfact.org/health/richard-dearlove-coronavirus-claims/

 

21st July Trump tweets about Chinavirus and says ‘it is patriotic to wear a mask’, thus subconsciously confirming its ‘military origin’.

 

24th December 2020 – PCR tests being run at 45 cycles thus promoting 97% false positives (there is a ref for the 97%). 45 cycles found from FOI request.

https://www.plymouthhospitals.nhs.uk/foi-disclosures-2020-21/disclosures-december-2020-4520/

 

May 2021 – PCR tests now being done at 25 cycles for the vaccinated (this was a few days ago, need ref).

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Chewing Grass

The original Public Health England Brochure (now expunged from the internet by Room 101).

Crown Copyright 2021

COV2020351V3 10M 1p FEB (APS) 2021

09032102.thumb.JPG.b50230bd237fc102818f77dc4c30ebaa.JPG09032101.thumb.JPG.90d94154a1d3e58743e63c3587c93d6b.JPG09032103.thumb.JPG.9c5890da408def55f9a645cc3aa685dc.JPG09032104.thumb.JPG.55918aa2549b3ed40527468426b95134.JPG

  • Agree 3
  • Informative 1
  • Cheers 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
wherebee

I think that leaflet image should be pinned somewhere in a locked thread so we can refer to it easily.  It's a very very useful rebuttable to those who claim everyone should be jabbed.

  • Agree 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
Stuffed
15 hours ago, wherebee said:

I think that leaflet image should be pinned somewhere in a locked thread so we can refer to it easily.  It's a very very useful rebuttable to those who claim everyone should be jabbed.

Does anyone have a PDF of that leaflet, rather than just JPG screenshots?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Van Lady
16 hours ago, wherebee said:

I think that leaflet image should be pinned somewhere in a locked thread so we can refer to it easily.  It's a very very useful rebuttable to those who claim everyone should be jabbed.

Agree. As @Chewing Grasshas posted it’s been deleted from the internet because there are new leaflets. Disgraceful and disgusting in my opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Heart's Ease
7 hours ago, Stuffed said:

Does anyone have a PDF of that leaflet, rather than just JPG screenshots?

I do, but i can't upload here as it's not an acceptable file type.

Link to post
Share on other sites
BurntBread

Thank you, @Chewing Grass, this is already a really nice resource. I don't have anything constructive to add, but a couple of requests anyway, in case people have the information:

1. For the September 2019 study, the Reuters article said that 4 subjects had antibodies in first week of Oct 19, so must have been infected in September. The comment about 14% of the samples being drawn in September is ambiguous, unless we know how many of those samples were positive (you only quote a % positive from the whole September-to-March data set).

2. It would be nice to have a reference for the pandemic planning which had been done prior to COVID-19. My understanding is that lock-downs had been ruled out as a control measure when they were evaluated.

3. The history of advice on mask-wearing is also interesting: at the least, it shows that the government was happy to lie at least once (presumably "for our own benefit") about their efficacy, either when they recommended them, or when they recommended against them. Masks are not a newly-developed technology, so our (and overseas) governments would be aware of their efficacy, or otherwise, right at the start.

4. The BMJ seems to still be a scientific journal*, and (I vaguely recall) has some articles on government responses which would be worth including.

* The politicisation of research is eerily similar to the 1930's, to my mind.

  • Informative 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
JoeDavola
On 05/06/2021 at 03:45, wherebee said:

I think that leaflet image should be pinned somewhere in a locked thread so we can refer to it easily.  It's a very very useful rebuttable to those who claim everyone should be jabbed.

What does the ‘new’ NHS leaflet say? Is the NHS explicitly calling for everyone to get jabbed now?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Chewing Grass
1 hour ago, JoeDavola said:

What does the ‘new’ NHS leaflet say? Is the NHS explicitly calling for everyone to get jabbed now?

That can be had here, all the previous versions V1 to V4 have been expunged by Room 101.

It is very carefully written, feel free to try and find pdf's of previous versions to prove me wrong about Room 101.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/984847/PHE_11920_COVID-19_vaccination_guide_phase_2_v5.pdf

  • Informative 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
JoeDavola
37 minutes ago, Chewing Grass said:

That can be had here, all the previous versions V1 to V4 have been expunged by Room 101.

It is very carefully written, feel free to try and find pdf's of previous versions to prove me wrong about Room 101.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/984847/PHE_11920_COVID-19_vaccination_guide_phase_2_v5.pdf

Cheers - I did post the link to the original here but it would be a pain to find it and as you say it will have been removed from their servers anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites
wherebee
40 minutes ago, Chewing Grass said:

That can be had here, all the previous versions V1 to V4 have been expunged by Room 101.

It is very carefully written, feel free to try and find pdf's of previous versions to prove me wrong about Room 101.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/984847/PHE_11920_COVID-19_vaccination_guide_phase_2_v5.pdf

very clever wording.  sort of thing I would write.

Note: 'WHO SHOULD HAVE"

is different from 

"WHO IS ELIGIBLE".

If you are not in the 'WHO SHOULD HAVE' box, you're a volunteer.

  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
JoeDavola
11 minutes ago, wherebee said:

very clever wording.  sort of thing I would write.

Note: 'WHO SHOULD HAVE"

is different from 

"WHO IS ELIGIBLE".

If you are not in the 'WHO SHOULD HAVE' box, you're a volunteer.

Yes it’s actually more reasonably worded than I’d expected.

And it’s also telling younger people that they’re not at much risk from covid and the main reason for the vaccine is to stop them passing it on to the elderly, rather than protecting the young from covid itself.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Battenberg

I started a daily list from May 3rd this year and wished I’d been doing it from the start.

It’s from the Daily Mail but I’m saving all the headlines from each day, with links, sometimes up to 3 different ones a day in order to look at how things keep changing and also contradicting itself. 

It’s easy to forget how they keep flip flopping and how stuff gets memory holed.

I wish we had running headlines on the whole Nightingale hospitals thing now that the public have decided to forget all about the amount of money that was wasted there.

 

  • Agree 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
JoeDavola

I didn’t however know that the risk of death was as high as 10% in the over 75’s.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
LC1
2 hours ago, BurntBread said:

2. It would be nice to have a reference for the pandemic planning which had been done prior to COVID-19. My understanding is that lock-downs had been ruled out as a control measure when they were evaluated.

I think this is a really crucial point. I don't have any links to hand to prove this (will try to look later), but it is my understanding that the WHO had internationally recognised protocols for infectious respiratory disease control that have been in place for quite some time.

So at what point in the timeline was it almost universally decided (Sweden excepted, singularly I think) that all countries would rip up the rulebook and go in a completely different (new, untested, not backed up by science, not based on any accepted policies etc.) direction?

This screams conspiracy (to me, at least) due to the complete lockstep nature of this divergence from established protocol, but nobody in the mainstream seemed to discuss it and I haven't yet heard an explanation for it.  

  • Agree 2
  • Cheers 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
wherebee
1 hour ago, JoeDavola said:

I didn’t however know that the risk of death was as high as 10% in the over 75’s.

 

Joe, Joe, think about it.  What's the annual risk of death in a 100 year old? 90%? a 99 year old? 85%? etc etc.  from 75 onwards, your annual risk of death from SOMETHING must be close to 10%.

here we go - by 80, the chance of dying within 1 year is 13%

https://www.finder.com/life-insurance/odds-of-dying

So - if you are over 75 and catch COVID, I am amazed that only 1 in 10 are dying, frankly.

 

THINK!

  • Agree 8
Link to post
Share on other sites
Chewing Grass

Put here for reference (not added to timeline as I would want a paper).

Dr Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D

First published at 18:05 UTC on May 19th, 2021.

Damage Testes & Ovaries

https://www.bitchute.com/video/VA2Fv9cwSP7K/

An exclusive interview with Dr Roger Hodkinson

May 28th 2021

https://principia-scientific.com/an-exclusive-interview-with-dr-roger-hodkinson/

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Mirror Mirror
8 hours ago, LC1 said:

I think this is a really crucial point. I don't have any links to hand to prove this (will try to look later), but it is my understanding that the WHO had internationally recognised protocols for infectious respiratory disease control that have been in place for quite some time.

So at what point in the timeline was it almost universally decided (Sweden excepted, singularly I think) that all countries would rip up the rulebook and go in a completely different (new, untested, not backed up by science, not based on any accepted policies etc.) direction?

This screams conspiracy (to me, at least) due to the complete lockstep nature of this divergence from established protocol, but nobody in the mainstream seemed to discuss it and I haven't yet heard an explanation for it.  

I’ve always thought the bat and pangolin cover story was bullshit, an opinion which has strengthened over time and it now seems to be becoming widely accepted that the virus’s origin was a lab leak.

If at the time the masses were being fed the B&P story, world leaders were being secretly briefed that a G of F virus had got out into the wild and could have an IFR of 4% (they told us 2% initially, which I can see they probably thought was a decent balance between making people take it seriously but without causing mass panic), I think it’s easy to imagine why they panicked and ripped up the Pandemic Plan.

It would also explain a lot else of what has gone on since.

  • Agree 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
Chewing Grass

25th March 2020, emergency powers act passed after 4 days of chin wagging in parliament which run for up to 2 years.

So that's another 9 months.

Link to post
Share on other sites
wherebee
9 hours ago, Mirror Mirror said:

I’ve always thought the bat and pangolin cover story was bullshit, an opinion which has strengthened over time and it now seems to be becoming widely accepted that the virus’s origin was a lab leak.

If at the time the masses were being fed the B&P story, world leaders were being secretly briefed that a G of F virus had got out into the wild and could have an IFR of 4% (they told us 2% initially, which I can see they probably thought was a decent balance between making people take it seriously but without causing mass panic), I think it’s easy to imagine why they panicked and ripped up the Pandemic Plan.

It would also explain a lot else of what has gone on since.

Yeah, I think this is likely as well - the first intel reports may well have scared them silly, and once on that path very hard to admit mistakes and turn around.

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Chewing Grass

Bookmark this, Hancock on his G7 wankfest, Big Pharma can now develop, test and deploy new theraputics (drugs) and vaccines in 100 days.

Oh, and Hancock & Sebastian Payne can't add up.

83+28+3 = 114

1808998074_Screenshotfrom2021-06-0721-05-45.thumb.png.a13e5d83f6384992b34e80b0e6bed190.png

  • Informative 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Chewing Grass

10th June 2021 Hospitals told to stop counting people with covid who are not ill with it, trebbles all round, the jabby magic works.

2042353025_Screenshotfrom2021-06-1020-16-09.jpg.b7f79df15e14f9d2e553480f27c72aa3.jpg

 

  • Informative 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
One percent
10 minutes ago, Chewing Grass said:

10th June 2021 Hospitals told to stop counting people with covid who are not ill with it, trebbles all round, the jabby magic works.

2042353025_Screenshotfrom2021-06-1020-16-09.jpg.b7f79df15e14f9d2e553480f27c72aa3.jpg

 

Was talking to someone this evening who said that government needs to be careful or it will lose the trust of the people. O.oxD

  • Lol 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • Vendetta
      By Vendetta
      Thought I’d start a thread on this as it is hugely significant and has the potential to be an absolute clusterfuck....
      So how will it work?
      How do they expect (say a 1500 pupil school) to carry out testing on all the kids?
      Where will they get the staffing to do this? 
      What rooms will they use? 
      Who will do the training?
      What happens if a kid tests positive?
      How will they manage to test every kid in a 200 year group - each test will take 5 mins I presume? That’s 1000mins (16 hours - nearly 3 school days?) 
      Surely mass testing just gives a ‘snap shot’ of who has / has not the disease that day - but unless every kid is tested everyday the process and results are effectively useless - other than telling you the incident rate at that point in time.
      Also as most cases are asymptomatic - surely this testing program will just discover cases that ‘would not otherwise be discovered’ (not to mention false positives), and as a result cause mass closures/ bubbles sent home?
      I’ll stop there.... I just cannot understand it? Any teachers on this site? Or people involved in testing or the policy roll out? What do parents think? 
      https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-55471095

    • unregistered_guest
      By unregistered_guest
      Spare a thought for the poor satirists. Truly they are the real victims of the cruel hand fate has played us.
      Two examples of stories I've seen today, which if you came across them under normal circumstances, you would check the date of the article; expecting it to be 1 April.
      I don't recall seeing either of these in the main coronavirus thread; and they deserve a thread of their own alongside any other egregious examples spotted in the wild.
      1) The Iranian military have announced the invention of a device which can detect coronavirus at a range of up to 100 metres, with 80% accuracy. It looks like tho old golfball detector scam has had new life breathed into it https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/04/17/iran_coronavirus_detector/
      2) Richard Branson is going to put up Necker Island as collateral against a bailout loan from the government. This was actually an April Fool's story from Guido Fawkes until someone from Virgin's PR dept saw it and thought, "What a good idea!" https://order-order.com/2020/04/20/branson-pledges-necker-island-bailout-collateral/
    • Vendetta
      By Vendetta
      My favourite part of Dosbods is the concentration of information, facts and figures posted here.
      @Chewing Grass has posted some really useful graphs on infection and mortality rate.

      I was thinking a thread of COVID19 graphs, charts and data - all found in one place might enhance our experience? 
       
      @Chewing Grass Please repost some of your best data if you could.
      Right then...I will start it off.... 



  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...