Jump to content
DOSBODS
  • Welcome to DOSBODS

     

    DOSBODS is free of any advertising.

    Ads are annoying, and - increasingly - advertising companies limit free speech online. DOSBODS Forums are completely free to use. Please create a free account to be able to access all the features of the DOSBODS community. It only takes 20 seconds!

     

A third jab is needed because the first 2 haven't worked?


Democorruptcy
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Democorruptcy said:

I think I upset a "free" man today: The moment the first booster goes into someone's arm, you will be downgraded from fully vaccinated to double jabbed. The places you think your 2nd jab has enabled you to go, might start asking for 'fully vaccinated only'. He said he isn't having any more. I told him full vaccination is just around the corner but I don't know which corner.

 

I might start doing some stickers. Something like:

"Not got your third jab yet? Please wear a mask! stay at home! Stay safe and protect others!"

"Save lives, protect the NHS, get the booster jab"

"Double jabbed? Please stay at home and wear a mask. Get a triple jab to be safe"

 

  • Agree 1
  • Lol 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chewing Grass
2 minutes ago, invalid said:

 

I might start doing some stickers. Something like:

"Not got your third jab yet? Please wear a mask! stay at home! Stay safe and protect others!"

"Save lives, protect the NHS, get the booster jab"

"Double jabbed? Please stay at home and wear a mask. Get a triple jab to be safe"

 

"Third time lucky? Get the jab."

"Make mine a trebble, I can handle my jabs"

Edited by Chewing Grass
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
Democorruptcy

Textbook stuff. Agree to jab 12 to 15 year old one day, then the next day decide on 3rd jabs in the over 50's because the first 2 jabs haven't worked. Once the 3rd jabs land in the arms of the ex-fully vaccinated now just double jabbed, this is going to be fun to watch.

triple.jpg.67f472e6bef3bbae93fb6316b8e0e16f.jpg

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, A tremendous # on the lung said:

https://m.jpost.com/health-and-wellness/covid-booster-shot-side-effects-israeli-health-fund-survey-explains-679456

The good news: 96% of third shot recipients who answered the survey said they did not need to get any medical assistance or advice to deal with the side effects :ph34r:

so if 4% need medical assistance after each booster..... how many before every single person has had a medical emergency after a jab?

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bedrag Justesen

CDC announcement expected today.

A third shot booster may not be necessary according to the science.

We must consider our values.

The third shot booster will protect our values.

That is why children must be vaccinated. Although not particularly at risk from the virus, children may be carriers. There are side effects which could mean a really small percentage of vaccinated children will suffer life changing consequences, or even die. This has to be worth it to protect parents, grandparents, uncles, aunts, and even older people the child does not know. 

Presently CDC recommends vaccinating children from the age of 12. Sadly the latest data shows the growing majority of cases, hospitalisations, and deaths, are now in the younger age range between 5 and 12. It is vital to begin vaccinating this group immediately.

We must also stamp out conspiracy theories which may put some people off being vaccinated.

One of the main arguments for refusing the vaccine offer is that fully vaccinated people can carry the same viral load in their nasal cavity as a person who has not been vaccinated.

Whilst this is true, it is not relevant to spreading the virus to others, or whether a person will become ill or worse.

Nasal cavity viral load is meaningless.

What counts is making sure you have your vaccine.

Your vaccine will prevent the virus infecting your lungs. This will keep you out of hospital, keep you away from the ICU, and stop you from dying.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bedrag Justesen

CDC announcement on booster shots should be delayed until more data collected, according to senior scientists.

Probably explains US media pushing back on following the science to urge the 54% of unvaccinated Americans, and those ready for topping up, to get their jabs in order to embrace values.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Democorruptcy

At the press conference on Monday when discussing the trial results of tests on children, it became official that the jabs don't provide lasting help.

"These results show a very high level of short term efficacy"

Couple that with this cracker from a Q) and A) from "Healthy" Gibraltar that suggests the jab side effects are so similar to the disease that they can't differentiate between them. However we are doing lots more jabs.

Quote

 

Q) I tested positive for the virus that causes Covid-19 21 days ago so I cannot be vaccinated.

A) Correct. You should wait 28 days after a positive Covid-19 test before being vaccinated. This is purely to prevent any confusion between Covid-19 symptoms and and side-effects from the vaccine.

https://healthygibraltar.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/GHA_FAQ_Cov_leaflet_21.4.21.pdf

 

 

 

  • Informative 2
  • Lol 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 17/09/2021 at 03:13, Bedrag Justesen said:

CDC announcement expected today.

A third shot booster may not be necessary according to the science.

We must consider our values.

The third shot booster will protect our values.

That is why children must be vaccinated. Although not particularly at risk from the virus, children may be carriers. There are side effects which could mean a really small percentage of vaccinated children will suffer life changing consequences, or even die. This has to be worth it to protect parents, grandparents, uncles, aunts, and even older people the child does not know. 

Presently CDC recommends vaccinating children from the age of 12. Sadly the latest data shows the growing majority of cases, hospitalisations, and deaths, are now in the younger age range between 5 and 12. It is vital to begin vaccinating this group immediately.

We must also stamp out conspiracy theories which may put some people off being vaccinated.

One of the main arguments for refusing the vaccine offer is that fully vaccinated people can carry the same viral load in their nasal cavity as a person who has not been vaccinated.

Whilst this is true, it is not relevant to spreading the virus to others, or whether a person will become ill or worse.

Nasal cavity viral load is meaningless.

What counts is making sure you have your vaccine.

Your vaccine will prevent the virus infecting your lungs. This will keep you out of hospital, keep you away from the ICU, and stop you from dying.  

Is that what the CDC are saying or yourself? 

Either way it seems to double up on what the manufacturers could prove their product can do- limit the most serious episodes but ineffective at transmission limiting....and dismissing the reality of the latter.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bedrag Justesen
47 minutes ago, Ninja said:

Is that what the CDC are saying or yourself? 

CNN Anderson Cooper 360 17 September 2021.

Discussion about why children must be vaccinated even though their risk from the virus is tiny.

Science suggests not necessary so why go ahead ?

Protect our values. 

Much the same propaganda as here.

Whatever anyone says there is an expert to explain why they are wrong not to celebrate vaccination.

Mostly complete with graphs, charts, and plenty of percentages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Bedrag Justesen said:

CNN Anderson Cooper 360 17 September 2021.

Discussion about why children must be vaccinated even though their risk from the virus is tiny.

Science suggests not necessary so why go ahead ?

Protect our values. 

Much the same propaganda as here.

Whatever anyone says there is an expert to explain why they are wrong not to celebrate vaccination.

Mostly complete with graphs, charts, and plenty of percentages.

WEF linked companies Vanguard and Blackrock own 7.5% and 4.8% of AT&T the owners of CNN

  • Agree 1
  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bedrag Justesen
6 minutes ago, ashestoashes said:

WEF linked companies Vanguard and Blackrock own 7.5% and 4.8% of AT&T the owners of CNN

Whatever age grouping is next in line, 5-12 year-olds, 12-16, over 50s boosters, remarkably always has the highest number of cases, hospitalisations, ICU admissions, and deaths.

Happens here same.

  • Agree 2
  • Lol 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Democorruptcy
25 minutes ago, Bedrag Justesen said:

Whatever age grouping is next in line, 5-12 year-olds, 12-16, over 50s boosters, remarkably always has the highest number of cases, hospitalisations, ICU admissions, and deaths.

Happens here same.

Don't forget the embryos.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bedrag Justesen said:

Whatever age grouping is next in line, 5-12 year-olds, 12-16, over 50s boosters, remarkably always has the highest number of cases, hospitalisations, ICU admissions, and deaths.

Happens here same.

I'm too busy working to keep in the loop much, but Mrs. E reckons primary schools are increasingly moving into the firing line. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chewing Grass
4 hours ago, Democorruptcy said:

At the press conference on Monday when discussing the trial results of tests on children, it became official that the jabs don't provide lasting help.

"These results show a very high level of short term efficacy"

It must be mind-blowingly, statistically difficult, to prove efficacy in children (especially short term) when they only mean 'hospitalisation plus death'.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Democorruptcy
4 hours ago, Bedrag Justesen said:

Whatever age grouping is next in line, 5-12 year-olds, 12-16, over 50s boosters, remarkably always has the highest number of cases, hospitalisations, ICU admissions, and deaths.

Happens here same.

Just put it out that the age group you want to target, is already showing more cases and this will be self fulfilling because then more of them will get tested. Then run the PCR cycles for your target group at 45 but much lower for any other age. Job done.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...