Jump to content
DOSBODS
  • Welcome to DOSBODS

     

    DOSBODS is free of any advertising.

    Ads are annoying, and - increasingly - advertising companies limit free speech online. DOSBODS Forums are completely free to use. Please create a free account to be able to access all the features of the DOSBODS community. It only takes 20 seconds!

     

IGNORED

Credit deflation and the reflation cycle to come (part 7)


spunko

Recommended Posts

ashestoashes
9 minutes ago, 23rdian said:

Who else is glad they didn't  succumb to taking this poison? 

don't think I'd be alive if I'd taken the AZ one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bobthebuilder
1 hour ago, Pip321 said:

But no covid though….so a statistical success I guess.

Maths and science are the new religion….sound enough if well meaning and challenged but in the wrong hands can be used for evil, control and death. 🤫

Sorry to hear about your mate…

Its all a load of bollocks Mr Pip, cannot believe any twat fell for it.

  • Agree 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Democorruptcy said:

How better is the rate for having above the FSCS at Barclays? Say +0.5% you are betting £145,000 to win £725 so 1-200 that Barclays won't go bust.

Re HL I posted in here that they told me £1.7m per customer was safe, which might mean they know about combined the banking licences and spread your money across 20 that are different.

I had an unsolicited email recently from Interactive Brokers setting out the safety of investments held on their platform, detailing the custodians, etc, and regulators.

Never seen that before in all my years with that broker and others.  

  • Agree 1
  • Informative 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bobthebuilder said:

A mate of mine had his booster a couple of weeks ago, been fucked ever since, left eye out of line cant see fuck all, then got taken from the dentist to A&E for a suspected stroke.

did you say these two things to him:

- it's a vaccine injury, make sure the doctors give you evidence they have recorded it as such, so you get compensation later

- can I have your car if you snuff it

  • Agree 5
  • Lol 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, reformed nice guy said:

Thanks for posting..basically gradual cuts in rates to around 3.5%..no mention of inflation but generally unemployment is rising up approx 1% so the economy is slowing but not collapsing..in direct contrast to that tweet model which says hard landing and sub 1% rates by early 2025..

there no mention of us federal debt which does not seem to reducing..plus as others have mention early next year the reverse repo funds have dried up so liquidity issues..

history says fed prints so imo no soft landing..muddy waters ahead but i think the inflation dragon will be returning with loose fiscal policy..will rates be cut is the question as if inflation is rising then they really can’t..uk economy grows by 0.5%..less than population grow so same same…so the only thing the tea leaves are saying expect the continuation of decline in public infrastructure and public services..we live in interesting times..be lucky..

  • Agree 3
  • Informative 2
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Axeman123
7 hours ago, reformed nice guy said:

They are still pushing the 60:40 approach I note, in spite of how badly it has fucked a lot of people over the last few years. It is also interesting to see how high the unemployment rate they are predicting for the EU is.

2 hours ago, Jay said:

basically gradual cuts in rates to around 3.5%

Its funny how it is doctrinal to predict these gradual downward adjustments every time, and yet on a chart that essentially never happens:

fed-funds-rate-historical-chart-2023-11-21-macrotrends(1).png.5c43273be3b1f8dd7cead8c0d245e937.png

  • Agree 3
  • Informative 2
  • Cheers 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Axeman123 said:

They are still pushing the 60:40 approach I note, in spite of how badly it has fucked a lot of people over the last few years. It is also interesting to see how high the unemployment rate they are predicting for the EU is.

Its funny how it is doctrinal to predict these gradual downward adjustments every time, and yet on a chart that essentially never happens:

fed-funds-rate-historical-chart-2023-11-21-macrotrends(1).png.5c43273be3b1f8dd7cead8c0d245e937.png

Cuts are always faster than the increases. 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chewing Grass
11 minutes ago, NogintheNog said:

So what horrors are they planning next to get out of the shithole they find themselves in.....

They will just steal funds (investments) from pensions and leverage them into spendable fiat on the back of 'green investments'.

  • Bogged 1
  • Vomit 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NogintheNog
2 hours ago, Axeman123 said:
4 hours ago, Jay said:

basically gradual cuts in rates to around 3.5%

Its funny how it is doctrinal to predict these gradual downward adjustments every time, and yet on a chart that essentially never happens:

fed-funds-rate-historical-chart-2023-11-21-macrotrends(1).png.5c43273be3b1f8dd7cead8c0d245e937.png

 

2 hours ago, Stuey said:

Cuts are always faster than the increases. 

I think I'm right in saying those grey lines on @Axeman123 chart are recessions. It is I suppose fairly obvious that to reduce demand and inflation you need to create a recession which would ideally be a nice slow down. But as that chart shows you never get that, and the next down turn is likely to result in a huge print, and the Hunter 'melt up'. :Old:

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Axeman123
10 minutes ago, NogintheNog said:

But as that chart shows you never get that, and the next down turn is likely to result in a huge print, and the Hunter 'melt up'.

AIUI the printing and BK come after the meltup. The meltup will be driven (again AIUI) by front-running the falsely anticipated return to goldilocks following the pause.

  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Axeman123 said:

They are still pushing the 60:40 approach I note, in spite of how badly it has fucked a lot of people over the last few years...

But has 60:40 really f*cked over a lot of people or did a lot of people put to much weight on 60:40 and not enough weight on things like saving hard (spending on needs/loves and not wants/likes etc), minimising taxes, minimising investment expenses, understanding what returns 60:40 would give in a left tail sequence of returns, low stress low BS WFH side hustles etc.

Of course I'm just a single anecdotal but my portfolio is really not much more than a 60:40 and over the longish term it's still generating a positive real return and because I've also done those other things life is pretty darn good with little to no financial worries.

  • Informative 5
  • Cheers 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eventually Right
38 minutes ago, DurhamBorn said:

I think people are waking up to the fact present policies mean systemic collapse.I suspect bennie changes today,but they will be nowhere near whats needed.They might even mess with the UC taper,that will do nothing to help turn things.It will be all too small of course.The Tories have been a disaster.However Labour will find themselves in worse trouble.No money and everyone shouting for it.That is when they might really go after capital.Its not a good prospect for most on here.

Yeah, I don't think think there'll be fundamental changes until things get properly ugly. :(

Whilst the powers that be are still confident of collecting their inflation-proof pensions, the decline continues.  When they realise those pensions are on course to be paid in monopoly money, because sterling is going to crater on the current course...then we might see some radical changes.  

Fuck knows whether it'll be too late by then though.

  • Agree 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Digital currency on its own might be enough?
I'd imagine that if all benefits switched to this and their use was curtailed to 'approved' uses, then the benefits lifestyle might stop or be devalued rapidly, with one real GBP being worth much more than a digital one which are basically no more than vouchers.

Same principle could then be applied to pensions, then a portion of people's savings, then a portion of people's investments. 

Most people wouldn't even know what had happened. 

  • Agree 4
  • Informative 1
  • Vomit 1
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, ashestoashes said:

don't think I'd be alive if I'd taken the AZ one

Same here as I have osteoarthritis and have to watch inflammatories.  I also read a lot of what happened to Judy Mikovits so it was obvious what was coming in around 2018.

  • Agree 2
  • Informative 1
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lightly Toasted
2 minutes ago, Boon said:

Digital currency on its own might be enough?
I'd imagine that if all benefits switched to this and their use was curtailed to 'approved' uses, then the benefits lifestyle might stop or be devalued rapidly, with one real GBP being worth much more than a digital one which are basically no more than vouchers.

Same principle could then be applied to pensions, then a portion of people's savings, then a portion of people's investments. 

Most people wouldn't even know what had happened. 

It would allow the state to renege on its real obligations while nominally meeting them. I think it's either this or collapse, no other politically achievable solution that I can see.

There'd be no need to apply it to productive investments since these are not state obligations, and need to be encouraged. Dividends will continue to be paid in real money IMO. Salaries -- debatable. Whatever the employer earns, is what it is able to pay.

Inclusion of dividends would be for political ("let's make the rich bastards suffer") reasons, and counterproductive because it would deter [incl. foreign] investment and production. But pensions, cash savings etc. would be ripe for inclusion, I think.

 

  • Agree 2
  • Informative 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Lightly Toasted said:

Inclusion of dividends would be for political ("let's make the rich bastards suffer") reasons, and counterproductive because it would deter [incl. foreign] investment and production. But pensions, cash savings etc. would be ripe for inclusion, I think.

What we need is a massive collapse in stock prices that will put people off holding them for the rest of their lives....

  • Lol 1
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heart's Ease

Been listening to a lot of Luke Gromen the past week or two. Lots of interest to this thread, but my top two takeaways are:

- USA has nowhere to go other than printing

- he's overweight physical gold, bitcoin.

Last two interviews have been on 'bitcoin' channels. I welcome their contribution and different viewpoint (bitcoin is a hard money life raft in a sea of fiat). 

 

 

 

I have not listened to any Bitcoin Standard interviews previously but Saife had Lyn Alden on the previous video and that was also a great listen. He had read and digested her Broken Money book and it showed.

  • Agree 2
  • Informative 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

sleepwello'nights
3 hours ago, NogintheNog said:


So what horrors are they planning next to get out of the shithole they find themselves in.....

Have you not noticed, war in Ukraine, war in Israel, where will the next one be@

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   3 members

    • jamanda
    • Niloc
    • Lightscribe
×
×
  • Create New...