• Welcome to DOSBODS

    Please consider creating a free account to be able to access all the features of the DOSBODS community. It only takes 20 seconds!

Sign in to follow this  
Cosmic Apple

Favourite car colour is now Black/Grey - Brexit to blame

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Hopeful said:

My car is white, because it was £600 more to have a colour.

My car is grey-ish. Black was far more expensive.

Judging by that article, I should have had it bullshit coloured.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Wahoo said:

My car is grey because I don't have to wash the bastard thing every other day. 

Ahh, I wash mine every day.

It'll be grey soon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Wahoo said:

My car is grey because I don't have to wash the bastard thing every other day. 

VAG do a great grey for that. My current car and a previous were the same and the dirt just makes it slowly go a darker shade, rather than looking dirty.

I'm after a newish car soon and the trend for white/black is annoying, I don't want either :(

Edited by Northern Welsh Midlander

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My car is grey. Because it’s second hand and the spec and the price are critical while the colour is (virtually) irrelevant. All things being equal I would have chosen black.

Amusingly, 4 other parents on my kid’s football team now have a Golf in the same colour. It can look a little weird if we all turn up at roughly the same time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Hopeful said:

My car is white, because it was £600 more to have a colour.

Would have been money well spent no-one who isn't a police force or running a wedding car hire business should own one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, SNACR said:

Would have been money well spent no-one who isn't a police force or running a wedding car hire business should own one.

Yes, personally, I'd have liked a colour although I still wouldn't have shelled out £600 for the luxury, but it's also sign written and no colour would have really 'worked' as well. All modern water-based car paints are shit though, as soft as fekk

Edited by Hopeful

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Metallic gun metal type grey, often seen on Audis, looks ok but this type of grey that looks like it's only had primer on is terrible seems like a lower end version of people who spend a fortune having someone stick matt black vinyl all over their Bentley which looks similarly awful.

AETV66643663_1.jpg

Edited by SNACR

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, SNACR said:

Metallic gun metal type grey, often seen on Audis, looks ok but this type of grey that looks like it's only had primer on is terrible seems like a lower end version of people who spend a fortune having someone stick matt black vinyl all over their Bentley which looks similarly awful.

Agreed, looks unfinished. This type of grey is good if you don't like washing your car:

$_86.JPG

Edited by Northern Welsh Midlander

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, This Time said:

I hate dark grey cars - they're really hard to see as they blend in with the tarmac too well.

Nowhere near as bad as fuckwit smoothie company Innocent who did this to all their delivery vehicles which certainly isn't going to mix with any country lane:

I think that is part of the reason why army trucks and land rovers have always driven around with their headlights on when on public roads

 

Innocent_drinks_company1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, This Time said:

I hate dark grey cars - they're really hard to see as they blend in with the tarmac too well.

I wrote off a brand new Mercedes, T-boned; my fault only on a technicality, the other driver hadn't seen me as it was the colour of rain on a dark night (grey) and it happened on a rainy, dark night.

this is our current driver... right on trend - would have preferred blue.

60A76557-9173-461F-AD28-054F50D076E1.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, swissy_fit said:

Isn't it obligatory to drive with lights on now in the UK, day or night? If not then it should be IMO. 

No, but all new cars must have DRLs.

Lights on in the daytime used to be associated with either Volvo owners or aggressive tailgating BMWs but I am fairly sold they are a good idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, longtomsilver said:

I wrote off a brand new Mercedes, T-boned; my fault only on a technicality, the other driver hadn't seen me as it was the colour of rain on a dark night (grey) and it happened on a rainy, dark night.

this is our current driver... right on trend - would have preferred blue.

60A76557-9173-461F-AD28-054F50D076E1.jpeg

Has that got the labia inspired rear lights a lot of current Mercs seems to have?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Car colour fashion follows a sequence.  20 years ago it was silver.  10 years ago it was white.  Black comes next.

Stupid though.  Black and silver are both associated with a significantly higher risk of accident.  Accident rates would go down by a measurable amount if we all drove brightly coloured cars.  

28 minutes ago, SNACR said:

No, but all new cars must have DRLs.

Lights on in the daytime used to be associated with either Volvo owners or aggressive tailgating BMWs but I am fairly sold they are a good idea.

I'm not.  DRL work by two mechanisms. 

  • They do improve the visibility of the vehicle, but not by much and mainly around the times when people should have turned their lights on anyway.  It is a 'help foolish people to safely drive complex machines safely even if they're really forgetful and aren't actually paying attention' mechanism; like many driver aids it serves to remove focus from their activity, not improve.
  • Having your lights on during the day definitely works really well, but only so long as most people haven't got theirs on.  This is increased contrast through apparent rarity.  At least some of the evidence for DRL is because of apparent rarity -- but if everyone has got theirs on then apparent rarity doesn't work any more.  But there is one group that did benefit massively from the apparent rarity effect -- motorcycles.  They have a smaller visual cross-section than cars (and most people in the UK can't even see them at all), so riding with lights on did give a useful increase in visibility.  Much of this benefit is lost with DRL.

Anyway, with DRL everywhere the apparent rarity effect is lost; the overall impact is 'makes bugger all difference for cars, reduced visibility for motorcycles.'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DRLs that only operate on the front are a menace, especially the LED ones bright enough for drivers to drive on during dust/dawn. The number of morons using them not realizing they have NO rear lights...

My current car has auto lights which seem to be really good. In current conditions they will be on all day if I was driving around, but on bright days they go off. Never need to think about them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a light metallic blue car.

Last year I spent a bit of time on car configurators. It boils my piss when, if you don't like white, you have to shell out another £500 or so ( as @Hopeful posted). What about the non metallic blues, greens, reds etc? They were no cost options on most cars a decade or 2 ago.

Surprised that Dacia doesn't do this given their value driven philosophy. It's either white or an extra £495 for a metallic colour.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Happy Renting
      [Edited]
      There is a danger of a second Referendum where Remain is made a Referenduman option, and the Leave vote split between two options, Deal or no Deal options.
      Unless transferable votes are used (or even if), even a minority of Remainers could win a second Referendum.
      This would tie the Government's hands to negotiate to Remain at any cost. This would be disastrous for the UK.
      Article 50 dictates that we leave on 29 March 2019.
      As this is an Article of a Treaty, it can only be set aside with the unanimous consent of all EU members at the highest level.
      It would only take one EU member to obstruct this to place the UK in an impossible position.
      If we petitioned to Remain, or extend time to negotiate a better deal, I am absoloutely certain that the EU would exploit this to the UK's extreme disadvantage.
      In particular, we would be obliged to join the Euro, as all new EU member states already are.
      Secondly, we would lose our EU rebate, which expires in 2021 anyway. It would not be renewed and we would probably be forced to increase our EU contributions on top of that.
      Additionally, pressure could be exerted by Ireland and Spain relating to the borders or status of NI and Gibraltar.
      The UK's nuclear deterrent could come under the control of an EU-wide military force, and so we could lose overall control of our deterrent. This would conflict with NATO obligations and could paralyze our military options.
      I think we still have vetos on certain other EU policies, which we would be forced to surrender.
      I hear no politicians or journalists telling us this.
      We may be sleepwalking into a disaster.
      The one hope is that with our current political chaos, it will be impossible to organse a second Referendum in time to halt our Leaving.
      Ironically, the longer the disasterous Treason May hangs on, the less likely a Second Referendum to Remain will take place.
      Our best hope now is we stay with this useless crone and grit our teeth for Leaving without a deal - a 'Hard Brexit'. The opportunity for a good deal has been wasted thorugh her utter incompetence.
      I see little prospect of the EU improving the terms for our Leaving. There is little incentive for them to do so.
      After Leaving,  Article 49 would define the process for rejoining and the implications (like joining the Euro) would have to be made clearer to the public.
      TLDR; We are either badly fucked, or really totally fucked.
       
    • By Long time lurking
      This has to be worthy of it`s own thread just for the comments on the twitter thread
       
       
    • By Chewing Grass
      Have decided to boost my larder with extra dried stuff (well stocked with canned) after the weekends scareganda in the media so I can last six weeks without having to fight the local retards in the supermarket for basics.
      Have also added some bagged popcorn to the list as comfort food while I watch the mayhem of the fuckwitts.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.