• Welcome to DOSBODS

    Please consider creating a free account to be able to access all the features of the DOSBODS community. It only takes 20 seconds!

One percent

Something happening at Salisbury hospital

News poll  

98 members have voted

This poll is closed to new votes
  1. 1. Which of the following websites do you trust the most for reporting news events? (Pick max. 2)

    • Mail Online
      9
    • BBC News
      2
    • RT.com
      9
    • Breitbart
      11
    • Guardian.co.uk
      1
    • Wikipedia
      4
    • Sky News
      2
    • DOSBODS.co.uk
      60
    • Guido Fawkes
      15
    • Other
      9
    • None they're all shit!
      22


Recommended Posts

So the 'number on the passport' is actually a number on an official stamp on an official document, a stamp that could have been applied as the documents were being collated and transmitted upwards last week. Is that it?

Edited by Panther

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Panther said:

So the 'number on the passport' is actually a number on an official stamp on an official document, a stamp that could have been applied as the documents were being collated and transmitted upwards last week. Is that it?

It all rather reminds me of the breathless articles that mention "money deposited in a numbered Swiss Bank Account" as if most ordinary  people kept their money in unnumbered bank accounts.

Edited by Virgil Caine

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, WorkingPoor said:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/sep/19/russian-born-woman-anna-shapiro-claims-she-was-target-in-salisbury-novichok-scare

Russian woman claims she was poisioned by strychnine on orders from moscow at Prezzos last sunday.

WTF goes on in this one horse town? 

The Mysterious Affair At Prezzos.

It is just like Agatha Christie

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is some interesting analysis of the Gatwick footage that revolves around dirty camera lens fingerprints, guy reckons both images were doctored and that dirt on the lens fingerprints as both being from the same camera.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I imagine conversation in Salisbury to be rather guarded these days, who knows what might happen if you say something like 'the geese are flying south for winter'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Chewing Grass said:

Here is some interesting analysis of the Gatwick footage that revolves around dirty camera lens fingerprints, guy reckons both images were doctored and that dirt on the lens fingerprints as both being from the same camera.

 

Terrible analysis.  

148602478_ScreenShot2018-09-19at21_31_44.thumb.jpg.54af1490b1b12cd017ac55d2bb9459e6.jpg

1. He focuses on one part of the image with tenuously similar marking but ignores the clear differences between them.. like the fact his "eye" "nose" and "mouth" patches look entirely different and don't even line up the same way in each picture.  

2. He says he lined them up as best as he could, suggesting one was digitally altered to make them look different. yet if they were digitally thrown out of alignment, he would be able to digitally line them up again perfectly if he had a clue what he was doing. The reason he can't is due to the lens distortion and slightly different fields of view, because they were different cameras, which is a bit beyond his skill level to fix.  See how the bottom right of one shows the red-lined edge of a sign, and the other shows the red corner of matching sign, forming a red triangle.  Is he seriously suggesting the source images were wider angle, showing both edge and corner, and they were undistorted, zoomed in, re-distorted, and then the time stamp added? 

3. He ignores the everything that's different about the images.. they way the waist level gates, when open, are aligned differently in each shot, the dark patch behind the 2018 in the left short but not the other, and of course the entirely different dirt patterns/"fingerprints" across the whole image. Look on the wall to the right for example. They're entirely different.. see the originals below, plus my enhanced versions.. enhanced to actually make things clearer across the image, not pushed to extremes to hide the differences like he does.

4. And of course, there's no explanation as to WHY anyone would want to mess with the time stamps, or fake these images in any way. The two Russians don't dispute that they flew into Gatwick at this time, so what exactly is the point of these supposed "fakes"?

775621447_airportchannels_comparison.thumb.jpg.b5db314a290d3ae9db65f6b7a2cbd647.jpg

These online "forensic image analysis" muppets.   Bloody amateurs! :wanker::Old:

Edited by MvR

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, MvR said:

These online "forensic image analysis" muppets.   Bloody amateurs! :wanker::Old:

Quite the "Finger print" screen is attached to the camera... It will be the same no matter where it was looking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, XswampyX said:

Quite the "Finger print" screen is attached to the camera... It will be the same no matter where it was looking.

Not quite - apparently these are the dome type, with a movable camera inside,  so the "fingerprints" should align with the scene, rather than the camera.. unless the dome itself is rotatable too.. maybe by being screwed off and on differently.. but that would be another step in the creation of an entirely pointless "fake" image.

The one thing that does interest me (very slightly ) is that these channels aren't the same ones that appear in the Google maps image. Those were offset with each other, and didn't have visible cameras. These are lined up and do.  So it looks like either we'd been looking at the wrong arrival terminal, or for some reason his google maps or other mapping software is more up to date...

But that's my inner autist showing..

979487768_ScreenShot2018-09-19at23_02_48.thumb.jpg.d331932e907785ee159e7c60f8112db5.jpgcorridors.thumb.jpg.473165d8b86fcb4180fea25158081725.jpg 

Edited by MvR

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, MvR said:

Not quite - apparently these are the dome type, with an movable camera inside,  so the "fingerprints" should align with the scene, rather than the camera.. unless the dome itself is rotatable too.. maybe by being screwed off and on differently.. but that would be another step in the creation of an entirely pointless "fake" image.

The one thing that does interest me (very slightly ) is that these channels aren't the same ones that appear in the Google maps image. Those were offset with each other, and didn't have visible cameras. These are lined up and do.  So it looks like either we'd been looking at the wrong arrival terminal, or for some reason his google maps or other mapping software is more up to date...

That's a good point well made!

When the fuck will anybody move those cameras in a 2' wide corridor of one way traffic?

I bought some second hand security cameras once and the previous camera images were burnt into the monitors. You could turn off the cameras and still see his fucking house!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Errol said:

The terrifying Maybot is certainly a weapon of devastating power.

Yep, but only for the enemies of the UK.

She must be good for something. I bet No 10 is spotless. :/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, XswampyX said:

Yep, but only for the enemies of the UK.

She must be good for something. I bet No 10 is spotless. :/

 

Edited by Hopeful

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By One percent
      https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/london-city-airport-closed-surrounding-12010651
      as per title. Could be something or nothing 
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.