• Welcome to DOSBODS

    Please consider creating a free account to be able to access all the features of the DOSBODS community. It only takes 20 seconds!

Sign in to follow this  
Great Guy

Why are channel 4 such arseholes?

Recommended Posts

I'm watching channel 4 news, seemingly black people are 4 times more likely to suffer mental illness. Seemingly the fault is white people being racist and discriminating against black people.

Honestly, I'm fucked off with minorities playing the victim card. We let black people come to Europe from shithole countries and instead of thanking us they do nothing but complain. It's getting to the stage where I just don't care what happens to non white people. Nothing we do will be good enough for black people. It's time we just stopped trying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Channel 4 news is a leftie love-in because of this prime twat:

Jon-Snow.jpg

 

I think the story is true to an extent as in any minority which feels unwelcome is going to be less mentally stable.

There's nothing special about black people for this though; have a quick read of Eminem's wiki page for what he suffered at the hands of black people and you can see that growing up white in a black majority area is also going to mean you suffer more mental illness.

That's not a story in which Ch 4 news would however be interested; ditto the plight of the white minority in South Africa.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Frank Hovis said:

Channel 4 news is a leftie love-in because of this prime twat:

Jon-Snow.jpg

 

I think the story is true to an extent as in any minority which feels unwelcome is going to be less mentally stable.

There's nothing special about black people for this though; have a quick read of Eminem's wiki page for what he suffered at the hands of black people and you can see that growing up white in a black majority area is also going to mean you suffer more mental illness.

That's not a story in which Ch 4 news would however be interested; ditto the plight of the white minority in South Africa.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Snow_(journalist)

After mixed success in his first attempt to pass his A-level qualifications, he moved to the Yorkshire Coast College, Scarborough, where he later obtained the necessary qualifications to gain a place reading Law at the University of Liverpool. However, he did not complete his undergraduate studies, being expelled for his part in a 1970 anti-apartheid socialist student protest, which he later described as "an absolute watershed in my life".[6]

he failed spectacularly academically and ended up at scabby tech. o.O

his dad was the Bishop of Whitby double o.O

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, One percent said:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Snow_(journalist)

After mixed success in his first attempt to pass his A-level qualifications, he moved to the Yorkshire Coast College, Scarborough, where he later obtained the necessary qualifications to gain a place reading Law at the University of Liverpool. However, he did not complete his undergraduate studies, being expelled for his part in a 1970 anti-apartheid socialist student protest, which he later described as "an absolute watershed in my life".[6]

he failed spectacularly academically and ended up at scabby tech. o.O

his dad was the Bishop of Whitby double o.O

Isn't it just typical that a supposedly impartial journalist views his part in an anti-apartheid demonstration as his greatest hour.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Frank Hovis said:

Isn't it just typical that a supposedly impartial journalist views his part in an anti-apartheid demonstration as his greatest hour.

With his horrendously privileged upbringing to boot. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, swissy_fit said:

As impartiality has gone out of the window in UK TV news reporting, why isn’t there a right wing channel to compensate for the Beeb and Channel 4? 

I very much doubt that the establishment wants a tv news channel reporting in a mor balanced way. We might then start to work out what is actually going on 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

C4 News featured an interview yesterday searching for solutions to stop rising knife and gun crime particularly within POC.

Jon Snow isn't everybody's cup of sick but I quite like the old duffer, I'll miss him when his inability to properly read his autocue, or his reading out Cathy, Matt, Krishnan prompts becomes unacceptable.

Jon tried to share the time fairly between his three guests. One of whom was a former gang member, groomed from the age of 8 by those in their middle 20s, and his peers into the gang.

His opinion was that this will keep happening because young POC are not listened to, they have no voice. He made the argument that the current system is broken, it doesn't work.

He stated young POC kids are taken away from their parents and families for too long, whilst they attend school. Once they start school the influence of parents is weakened, instead the kids listen and are influenced by other kids, and older kids, leading them into gang culture. The problem made worse by both parents working from early hours until late, not spending quality time with their kids teaching them right from wrong.

At this point the interview focused on the other two guests, one of whom was a retired policeman, the other a young POC woman.

He blamed police cuts. She made the point that former gang members don't always have an insight into current gang mentality.

It's a mess.

We all go to work, we all send our kids to school, we all try to do our best. Well most of us do this. Only some of us are stabbing and shooting each other, not always POC either.

However to a casual observer London has become Jamaica.

Edited by Bedrag Justesen
Sp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Bedrag Justesen said:

C4 News featured an interview yesterday searching for solutions to stop rising knife and gun crime particularly within POC.

Jon Snow isn't everybody's cup of sick but I quite like the old duffet, I'll miss him when his inability to properly read his autocue, or his reading out Cathy, Matt, Krishnan prompts becomes unacceptable.

Jon tried to share the time fairly between his three guests. One of whom was a former gang member, groomed from the age of 8 by those in their middle 20s, and his peers into the gang.

His opinion was that this will keep happening because young POC are not listened to, they have no voice. He made the argument that the current system is broken, it doesn't work.

He stated young POC kids are taken away from their parents and families for too long, whilst they attend school. Once they start school the influence of parents is weakened, instead the kids listen and are influenced by other kids, and older kids, leading them into gang culture. The problem made worse by both parents working from early hours until late, not spending quality time with their kids teaching them right from wrong.

At this point the interview focused on the other two guests, one of whom was a retired policeman, the other a young POC woman.

He blamed police cuts. She made the point that former gang members don't always have an insight into current gang mentality.

It's a mess.

We all go to work, we all send our kids to school, we all try to do our best. Well most of us do this. Only some of us are stabbing and shooting each other, not always POC either.

However to a casual observer London has become Jamaica.

Here's my suggestions. 

1. Bring back hanging.

2. Bring back hard labour and the short sharp shock. 

3. Arm the police.

4. Control the borders and deport anyone convicted of serious crimes to their or their parents' country of origin. 

Job done. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Austin Allegro said:

Here's my suggestions. 

1. Bring back hanging.

2. Bring back hard labour and the short sharp shock. 

3. Arm the police.

4. Control the borders and deport anyone convicted of serious crimes to their or their parents' country of origin. 

Job done. 

To which I would add:

Areas with "curfew" where between certain hours there will be automatic stop and search without any justification being required.

An automatic escalation of the penalty for subsequent crimes such as a doubling.  So judge gives two months; it's a second offence so this is immediately four months.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Frank Hovis said:

To which I would add:

Areas with "curfew" where between certain hours there will be automatic stop and search without any justification being required.

An automatic escalation of the penalty for subsequent crimes such as a doubling.  So judge gives two months; it's a second offence so this is immediately four months.

All of these suggestions can be summarised simply as 'actually do something about the problem instead of just hand-wringing and blaming 'society' or 'poverty' for everything'. 

IN other Channel Four arseholery, I recently saw a new 'ident' trailer for the channel in which multiethnic children are playing happily together in a car-less street as a sari-clad woman walks past. At first I thought it was meant to be set in the 70s but I think it may well be how Channel Four execs who haven't left Hampstead since 1985 think ordinary British people live. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, dgul said:

But these types of effects are really important to know.

Now, you can't just say 'so stop being racist, you guys!'  This is a deeply intrinsic characteristic of populations (possibly white ones, possibly all ones -- they've not identified that).  Once you know things like this you've got to really work with the new information you've got.  So, the outcomes might (should) be:

  • How many people can immigrate into the UK without incurring this effect?
  • Once you go over this level, what is the cost of the measures necessary to mitigate the effect?
  • Are there differences between sub-populations?  So, might there be differential mitigation measures depending on where the people come from?
  • What would be the impact of changing immigration levels in order to reduce this effect? 
  • We've worked out a requirement for immigration in order for the economy and society to continue to function optimally.  The impact on our culture and infrastructure has been worked through and there's definitely a significant benefit.  There is a potential problem with acceptance, but we're going to do xyz about that and there's clear evidence that that'll work.  We've also checked that the intended migration won't have a detrimental impact on the countries their emigrating from. 
  • We're going to have a 10 year experiment with limited numbers and try to work out that the theory is correct -- if it isn't we'll revisit our theory.

I wouldn't mind so much if that was what was actually done.  But this has never been done.  What we've had was:

  • We're going to have lots more immigration
  • Not sure how much.  Dunno.
  • Not sure what the effects are likely to be.  Dunno about that either.
  • There might be an impact on the countries they're leaving from -- don't care about that at all.
  • But if any bad things happen it is because you guys are so racist.  Stop it.
  • No, really.  I don't care about anything you say.  Just stop being so f***ing racist.
  • Oh, I've identified some bad things.  It is because you're racist.  Just stop it.
  • Here's £100 for your community to pay for a street party to help with tensions in the community.
  • What!  There are still problems?  You guys are so racist.  Oh, it is the older immigrants being racist towards the new ones?  Well, that's only because you white people are so racist.

I would mind even then because the purpose of mass immigration is to lower labour costs.

And unless you are Phillip Green or The Queen that means you, I and all British workers seeing their pay and conditions worsening with each year that passes.

And that includes the people who immigrated last year to work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Frank Hovis said:

I would mind even then because the purpose of mass immigration is to lower labour costs.

And unless you are Phillip Green or The Queen that means you, I and all British workers seeing their pay and conditions worsening with each year that passes.

And that includes the people who immigrated last year to work.

Well, sure -- but if they had a proper analysis before or even during the immigration then the greater population could then have a discussion about whether they wanted it (duh! no!).

But what we've had is hidden agendas leading to unclear policy and a clever psychological manipulation (racist!) to ensure it isn't challenged.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Frank Hovis said:

I would mind even then because the purpose of mass immigration is to lower labour costs.

And unless you are Phillip Green or The Queen that means you, I and all British workers seeing their pay and conditions worsening with each year that passes.

And that includes the people who immigrated last year to work.

or any of the other influential and powerful sectors not threatened by immigration. If it were only Philip Green and Lizzie the argument would easily be won.The higher-up in the media, luvvies, politicians, pretty much all employers, those higher up in the public sector. All loud, sanctimonious, hypocritical and (sadly) influential voices. All gain from immigration apart from having more crowded roads as otherwise they don't use any of the public infrastructure or live in areas where immigrants move in.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I first noticed how low C4 had sunk during our vote to leave nearly 2 years ago now.

I was not at work due to illness so was able to watch the uncut news feed all day. By the evening C4 news they had cut and pasted it to suit their agenda totally distorting the truth. Since then I've not bothered with them..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

C4 News presenter Matt Frei interviewing Lt General Evgeny Buzhinsky, wherein the Russian was making the serious point that relations with the West are presently more dangerous than during the Cold War.

Buzhinsky challenged the narrative that Assad used chemical weapons, noting that intelligence sources have evidence suggesting the attack was faked.

Frei then asked the Lt General if he also believed the moon landings were faked ?

Difficult to answer !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't the answer because they are the spawn of the devil itself

Channel 4 Television Corporation that runs it is a public corporation of the Department of Digital Culture Media and Sport.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Bedrag Justesen said:

C4 News presenter Matt Frei interviewing Lt General Evgeny Buzhinsky, wherein the Russian was making the serious point that relations with the West are presently more dangerous than during the Cold War.

Buzhinsky challenged the narrative that Assad used chemical weapons, noting that intelligence sources have evidence suggesting the attack was faked.

Frei then asked the Lt General if he also believed the moon landings were faked ?

Difficult to answer !

Really? That is Cathy Newman lobster level. The General should have replied 'so you are saying I faked the moon landings?'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be fantastic if Channel 4 has to relocate to Birmingham, or some other immigrant infested shithole. Give them a taste of the wonderful enriched life they are forcing upon us from their ivory tower in London.

Yes, I know London is also an immigrant infested shithole, but it’s harder to avoid reality in Birmingham!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, Bedrag Justesen said:

C4 News presenter Matt Frei interviewing Lt General Evgeny Buzhinsky, wherein the Russian was making the serious point that relations with the West are presently more dangerous than during the Cold War.

Buzhinsky challenged the narrative that Assad used chemical weapons, noting that intelligence sources have evidence suggesting the attack was faked.

Frei then asked the Lt General if he also believed the moon landings were faked ?

Difficult to answer !

Some of those type of MSM tricks risk backfiring, or they've just accepted they're only catering to an audience of remaining believers in the MSM. I seem to think there was a poll not that long ago where pretty much anywhere, outside the USA, belief the moon landings were faked was surprisingly high.

I think there ought to be some real candour at some point, whilst there are still living Apollo astronauts, as it's probably pretty unfair that Armstrong, Aldrin and co will likely be recorded in history as the Milli Vanilli of the space science world which is rather unfair considering they were often decorated fighter pilots etc. The fact Armstrong's funeral was held at the local golf club, in very stark contrast to the ticker tape treatment he was given earlier in life, and the White House resisted calls for a state funeral felt like a damage limitation exercise for disclosing the truth at some stage. 

Edited by SNACR

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Panther said:

Really? That is Cathy Newman lobster level. The General should have replied 'so you are saying I faked the moon landings?'

Yep, idiot level interviewing that cannot cope with anyone other than tame interviewees who will say what is expected of them.

Give them an answer they aren't expecting and they come out with such total garbage as that and Newman's lobsters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Chewing Grass
      Excellent short video on how JP Morgan and the Rothschilds manipulated the USA into WW1.
      Also a reminder to the plebs of what little value they will be in the future to the seriously monied.
    • By Carl Fimble
      The forum wot King Spunko of Dosbodia did make us was a good one and has now a full year under it's belt.
      Thank you Spunko, and all who have written over the year. We're at a bit of a turning point right now (Count Dankula), but we can fight now to keep our freedom of speech, and use words written an spoken to save ourselves and the world.
       

       
      Hail Spunko!
      Hail Victory!
      Hail Our People!
       

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.