• Welcome to DOSBODS

    Please consider creating a free account to be able to access all the features of the DOSBODS community. It only takes 20 seconds!

Sign in to follow this  
SpectrumFX

Women Increasing Drawn to the Right Wing

Recommended Posts

Bollocks to left and right wing, it's Nationalists vs Globalists.

Only question is whether you are a Civic Nationalist, or an Ethno Nationalist.

 

 

 

CivNat vs EthnoNat.jpg

Edited by Carl Fimble
replacing image with a higher resolution one

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I too am an Ethno Nationalist, I would prefer it didn't have to be this way but it has become increasingly obvious that multiculturalism does not work, and that we will not survive unless we put ourselves first, as every other group is allowed to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, maudit said:

I'd go for civic as I dont't mind some diversity but only if other groups birth rate is less then or equal to native.

That 'if' is why I'm not. I don't care about a tinge around the edges, I'm second generation immigrant myself so felt a lot in common with people like that when I was growing up. That was the time of civic nationalism but things have gone much too far for that now.

Edited by Panther

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Bkkandrew said:

Whilst I have a great deal of sympathy for ethno nationalism, I cannot support it. This is mainly because I have five half English, half Cambodian children. The are being brought up as traditional British children and for this reason I do not believe that their skin colour comes into it.

Maybe a third type is needed, cultural nationalist?

I notice on facebook that I see a lot more 'right wing' posts from women than men. I had put it down to them simply being braver in that respect and more likely to speak their mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Carl Fimble said:

Bollocks to left and right wing, it's Nationalists vs Globalists.

Only question is whether you are a Civic Nationalist, or an Ethno Nationalist.

 

 

 

CivNat vs EthnoNat.jpg

This. There is no left right. It’s a distraction and serves to divide. It’s an us and them.  Globalist against ordinary working people. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Frank Hovis said:

 

Agree with that, it's a big "if" and the current status of the benefits system / divorce laws / house prices means that the wealthier you are the less likely you are to have children; and indigenous Brits are more likely to be wealthier.  So the system tips to immigrants, who are likely to be poorer, having more kids.

I am absolutely fine with (most) minorities as long as they remain a small minority but it's gone far past the point of that in most of London for one.

I agree but was making the point that probably like most on here we are not racists in the way the media would portray people who want a nation state with borders. Simply that the very reasonable requirement of please do not outbreed us and take over is not being met by one particular and rapidly growing group.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Carl Fimble said:

Bollocks to left and right wing, it's Nationalists vs Globalists.

Only question is whether you are a Civic Nationalist, or an Ethno Nationalist.

 

 

 

CivNat vs EthnoNat.jpg

given those two choices I'd have to pick Ethnic Nationalism, but I disagree with the premise that these are the two choices.

Ethinic Nationlism does not have to be about colour, it should be about culture and integration. If this was global, the world would be a quilt patchwork of multiculturism, defined geographically.

If the entire world adopted civic nationalism, there would be no multiculturism, we'd just merge in to a non distinct soup of bland sameness, with every country being the same as any other. You can see why the globalists want this.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Bkkandrew said:

Whilst I have a great deal of sympathy for ethno nationalism, I cannot support it. This is mainly because I have five half English, half Cambodian children. The are being brought up as traditional British children and for this reason I do not believe that their skin colour comes into it.

Agree. It is purely a cultural issue. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not surprising. Women have been some of the first victims of extreme left wing ideologies that are currently being enforced such as identity politics which posits that "women" as a biologically distinct group don't exist and that anyone can be a woman and therefore enter spaces previously assigned to biologically female "women". The Government are even going along with a lot of this nonsense which is terrifying, not just for women's safety but because it overturns centuries of common sense and scientific facts.

Then there is the mass rape, sexual assault and abuse of women and young girls by the men of cultures that are generally hostile to Western European principles of liberty, respect for the individual, respect for women etc, all in the name of pushing immigration and that all cultural values are equal and should be respected.

It's no wonder women are starting to feel scared and see the right as the protectors of their hard fought freedoms.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Frank Hovis said:

This.  President Orban would have been an absolutely typical national leader fifty years' ago; now he is "far right".

Tommy Robinson is somehow "far right" by taking a stand for the values of decency and patriotrism that were fairly universal fifty years' sgo.

"Far right" is a media label for anybody opposed to the great globalism project which, if the effects of it upon themselves personally were simply explained to first world people*, the vast majority of people would oppose.

 

* It means that your pay and living standards will inexorably converge downwards those of the poorest countries in the world because this provides universal cheap labour and bigger profits for the corporates who fund political lobbyists and politicians.

I agree.  I think the end of the cold war has meant that the Marxists who promote global socialism have been allowed to pursue their agenda because it fits in with the wishes of the capitalists who want cheap labour.  You, therefore, end up with what we have now with the idiots of the Labour party aligned with the greedy bastards of the Conservatives and their opponents being branded as "Far Right", "Wacist" or any other labels

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Fossildog said:

Agree. It is purely a cultural issue. 

The responses on here, as usual, make me think a bit more deeply. Initially I would have said I'm a civic nationalist because I know people of different ethnicity and have friends who are of different races. We have many opinions in common even about immigration and how our society is changing because of it. They don't like the way the changes are affecting our lives.

Then the but comes in. They may have stayed in the UK because it suited them and they liked how we lived, our society and cultural norms. Would their children and grandchildren share the same views? Then I wonder whether it is cultural or whether culture is a consequence of genetic personality traits. 

Reluctantly I think more and more research shows there are differences that account for the behavioural actions of each race, not fully understood maybe. We accept that there are different national characteristics amongst European countries, passionate Italians, German efficiency, revolting French (:)). More than cultural I think. The overwhelming characteristic of the nation is determined by the ethnicity of the majority of the population. The minorities generally accept and conform but they will display other  characteristics when the proportion of their population size changes. Think British expats in Spain.

So on balance I'm an Ethno Racist. That's not to say I'm a white supremacist just that I accept the reality that their are differences between races.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, SpectrumFX said:

I think so. Which reminds me of this great quote from Thomas Sowell.

 

It would also mark you out as a naive idiot. It has never been a level playing field. It tips and turns, favouring different groups at different points in history. But has never be level. 

The only group who has never, ever been favoured is the white, indigenous working class. Funny that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, null; said:

Maybe a third type is needed, cultural nationalist?

I notice on facebook that I see a lot more 'right wing' posts from women than men. I had put it down to them simply being braver in that respect and more likely to speak their mind.

I'd always assumed that it was because they could shout "sexist" if anyone confronted them, whereas a white Anglo-Saxon male has no form of defence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Southmartin said:

Agree!

30 years ago someone was 'Right wing' if they donned a balaclava and marched around beating up black people. .. Now all you have to do is suggest that a 45 year old man, who is identifying as a woman, should probably not be allowed to stand around in the girls toilets.

That's a beautiful summary.
Needs to be memed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.