Jump to content
DOSBODS
  • Welcome to DOSBODS

     

    DOSBODS is free of any advertising.

    Ads are annoying, and - increasingly - advertising companies limit free speech online. DOSBODS Forums are completely free to use. Please create a free account to be able to access all the features of the DOSBODS community. It only takes 20 seconds!

     

IGNORED

The cost of energy


invalid

Recommended Posts

There has been some discussion on DBs thread of oil and energy prices and I thought it might be an idea to start a dedicated thread, especially as we now have a couple of members who work in the oil industry.

I'll kick it off with a thought I had earlier. Gas prices have risen due to the 'wind drought' over the summer. With increasing generation from wind, the impact of lack of wind on pricing of fossil fuels may begin to have a bigger impact.

So where I used to watch oil prices and have recently started to track gas prices, maybe I should now start watching the weather forecasts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is why Germany is pressing on with Nordstream II, ignoring the American drivelling.

The Germans understand how important gas will be to their future and the Russians are the most reliable supplier and offer the best price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gas futures continue to rise, I was expecting them to have levelled off or started to drop by now. On DBs thread there was a mention of 18% increases in energy prices in a couple of months.

Any thoughts on what is pushing up the gas prices? I find it hard to believe that it's all down to the wind drought, surely there must be another factor?

 

Gas Futures  2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Option5 said:

Lack of capacity in infrastructure, pipelines full, LNG plants full. Getting it out of the ground is easy, transporting it no so easy.

If a supply bottle neck is the cause then surely it must be driven by demand, or a predicted increase in demand?

Prices were fairly stable for around 18 months within a range and then suddenly shooting up from around May this year.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, null; said:

If a supply bottle neck is the cause then surely it must be driven by demand, or a predicted increase in demand?

Prices were fairly stable for around 18 months within a range and then suddenly shooting up from around May this year.

 

The growth in demand has been steady however due to the fall in prices the capex projects planned to keep up with demand, replacement/repair/upgrade of old facilities and the building of new facilites were all canned. The restrictions in supply were inevitable, next will come the lack of production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Option5 said:

The growth in demand has been steady however due to the fall in prices the capex projects planned to keep up with demand, replacement/repair/upgrade of old facilities and the building of new facilites were all canned. The restrictions in supply were inevitable, next will come the lack of production.

Thanks, it all makes sense now.

Do you think the price rise will trigger another round of investment? If production is set to fall, then I wouldn't want to be investing in infrastructure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, null; said:

Thanks, it all makes sense now.

Do you think the price rise will trigger another round of investment? If production is set to fall, then I wouldn't want to be investing in infrastructure.

Infrastructure investment will take place (it's already started) but it's probably too late now to avoid some supply issues. In addition some infrastructure that was planned for upgrades is now too far gone to make the investment viable. If demand falls in line with avilability we'll be OK if it doesn't there may well be issues.

The US will probably be OK in the short term with fracking but very little of it is profitable due to huge ongoing development costs. So unless the government play the "security of supply" card many of the companies will go under.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bricks & Mortar

Just arranged my electricity supply contract, (business supply - low user).  Best I could do was 21% more expensive than our present deal.  Signed up for 4 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After 10 days of consecutive increases in the gas futures, its dropped slightly today.

A blip in the trend or the top? I think the top (for now) and expect to see it bounce around in the new range for the next six months. Nothing more than me gazing into my crystal ball so lets see what happens.

I'm hearing lots of reports elsewhere of big hikes in energy bills for both household consumers and business. Also hints that fuel duty freezes might be starting to thaw.

Inflation ahead?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, null; said:

After 10 days of consecutive increases in the gas futures, its dropped slightly today.

A blip in the trend or the top? I think the top (for now) and expect to see it bounce around in the new range for the next six months. Nothing more than me gazing into my crystal ball so lets see what happens.

I'm hearing lots of reports elsewhere of big hikes in energy bills for both household consumers and business. Also hints that fuel duty freezes might be starting to thaw.

Inflation ahead?

In energy costs over the next 6 months, certainly.

This is the sort of thing that might tip plenty zombie companies over the edge. I thought everything was going to hold together in the wider economy until mid 2019, but now I'm not so sure, this is the sort of news that might force the BOE's hand on interest rates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bricks & Mortar
12 hours ago, Bricks & Mortar said:

Just arranged my electricity supply contract, (business supply - low user).  Best I could do was 21% more expensive than our present deal.  Signed up for 4 years.

Quoting myself seems weird.  It's just that I've something to add.

They offered 17.62p/unit for a 1 year deal.  16.96 for 2 years.  16.94 for 3 years and 16.99 for 4 years.  It would seem the suppliers think this is a short term spike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Bricks & Mortar said:

Quoting myself seems weird.  It's just that I've something to add.

They offered 17.62p/unit for a 1 year deal.  16.96 for 2 years.  16.94 for 3 years and 16.99 for 4 years.  It would seem the suppliers think this is a short term spike.

Renewables?

onshore wind $40 per MWH

solar $50 per MWH (and getting cheaper as technology and production advances)

offshore wind $60 per MWH

Gas $60 per MWH

Coal $102 per MWH

Nuclear $148 per MWH

Good job we are not building any new nuclear power stations in the UK.. otherwise our electrical prices would go through the roof!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, macca said:

Renewables?

onshore wind $40 per MWH

solar $50 per MWH (and getting cheaper as technology and production advances)

offshore wind $60 per MWH

Gas $60 per MWH

Coal $102 per MWH

Nuclear $148 per MWH

Good job we are not building any new nuclear power stations in the UK.. otherwise our electrical prices would go through the roof!

 

so what's your preferred source of base load power ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, macca said:

Renewables?

onshore wind $40 per MWH

solar $50 per MWH (and getting cheaper as technology and production advances)

offshore wind $60 per MWH

Gas $60 per MWH

Coal $102 per MWH

Nuclear $148 per MWH

Good job we are not building any new nuclear power stations in the UK.. otherwise our electrical prices would go through the roof!

 

I'm astounded by that price for nuclear.  I genuinely thought it was one of the cheapest with the only thing holding it back being safety concerns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Frank Hovis said:

I'm astounded by that price for nuclear.  I genuinely thought it was one of the cheapest with the only thing holding it back being safety concerns.

Its the problem of getting rid of the shit now you can't dump it into Beauforts Dyke. The stuff is stored and has been moved from one building to another like musical chairs for 60 years with probably another 200 to go.

Bit like a dose of  herpes really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bricks & Mortar
2 hours ago, Frank Hovis said:

I'm astounded by that price for nuclear. 

It used to be cheap, but now they want everything earthquake-proof, tidal-wave proof, and bomb-proof.  Insurance premiums went up a bit too,  over recent years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Frank Hovis said:

I'm astounded by that price for nuclear.  I genuinely thought it was one of the cheapest with the only thing holding it back being safety concerns.

The cost of building and maintaining the plants is huge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 11/09/2018 at 19:43, Errol said:

The UK shut one of the gas storage sites didn't it?

I've just been reading up on what happening at the Rough storage facility, owned by Centrica. They made the decision in 2017 to stop using it for storage following some testing which showed it was no longer cost effective due to the high cost of needing to update the infrastructure.

What I found interesting was that it's not really been 'shut'. It's continueing to produce gas until the reserves are depleted, one article suggested this might be up to 5 years. It seems that the output is low in the scheme of things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another interesting find today, often hear of coal plants being shut down, but it seems many are being rebuilt to run on gas.

Eggborough being an example. Almost 2GW of generation but will reopen in a few years as a CCGT.

I wonder what gas price predictions they used in the business cases for these new CCGT plants?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got money in both Greencoat Wind and The Renewables, Britains biggest windfarm owners and FTSE 250 companies so you would suppose shares on both would have crashed due to lack of wind. Nope they  are both at all time highs, having risen 10% over the summer excluding the 6 to 7% annual yield because profits are double on high energy prices. Share movements tend to be counter-intuitive which is why I am generally rubbish at picking them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, crashmonitor said:

I've got money in both Greencoat Wind and The Renewables, Britains biggest windfarm owners and FTSE 250 companies so you would suppose shares on both would have crashed due to lack of wind. Nope they  are both at all time highs, having risen 10% over the summer excluding the 6 to 7% annual yield because profits are double on high energy prices. Share movements tend to be counter-intuitive which is why I am generally rubbish at picking them.

Yes, something I've learnt over the years is that share prices do not always react as expected to certain news - although there normally is a reason for it. E.g. 'good news' anounced but shares go down, reason is the market has already priced in 'very good news'.

Wind farms are nicely hedged I guess, less wind mean less energy to sell but balanced out by prices going higher.

I don't think investing in renewables was a rubbish pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...