• Welcome to DOSBODS

    Please consider creating a free account to be able to access all the features of the DOSBODS community. It only takes 20 seconds!

Sign in to follow this  
spygirl

Attenborough: 'Population growth must come to an end'

Recommended Posts

That is the single most worrying thing about freedom of movement. With borders you have the Meansto control population growth as a local policy. It's practically impossible at a global level. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a dream where I had bought a French made estate car ( or station wagon or shooting brake, depending on your origin). It was a nightmare and bits fell of and it got expensive. How irrelevant was that? Maybe I dreamed of a large family?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's all the point of zombie films. There are many more zombie films than zombies. Everyone surviving at the end, gets Milla Jovovich as a plaything and a free truck.xD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Libspero said:

No need..  just free access to contraception and tax incentives for people with small families.  Globally.

Forget the Paris accord..  this is what the world really needs agreement on.

The Chinese had the right idea..  they were just a bit heavy handed about it.

From the 1950s to about the 1980s or so, over-population was a major concern - then at some point, there seemed to be a change in opinion whereby over-population wasn't the problem, it was 'man made global warming'. Never mind the fact that if the global warming believers are true, the fewer people there are, the less man made global warming there would be. 

It's the same with the Islamification of Europe - it's a symptom of overpopulation. It all comes down in the end to too many people being born, but nobody wants to talk about that, presumably because of the eugenics/nazi undertones involved. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Austin Allegro said:

presumably because of the eugenics/nazi undertones involved. 

Yeah. Shame that the world is facing catastrophe because people are too embarrassed to discuss things truthfully...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Libspero said:

No need..  just free access to contraception and tax incentives for people with small families.  Globally.

Forget the Paris accord..  this is what the world really needs agreement on.

The Chinese had the right idea..  they were just a bit heavy handed about it.

[/Soapbox]

Yep, no need for one child families, two will do as there are plenty who only want one or none. Tax the absolute nuts off anyone going for a third, then you'll see a manageable fall in global population.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Austin Allegro said:

From the 1950s to about the 1980s or so, over-population was a major concern - then at some point, there seemed to be a change in opinion whereby over-population wasn't the problem, it was 'man made global warming'. Never mind the fact that if the global warming believers are true, the fewer people there are, the less man made global warming there would be. 

It's the same with the Islamification of Europe - it's a symptom of overpopulation. It all comes down in the end to too many people being born, but nobody wants to talk about that, presumably because of the eugenics/nazi undertones involved. 

Its always been population behind the scenes. Global warming is just a racket. Importing people from low carbon producing countries to high ones (ie the west) is obviously counter to 'reducing carbon emissions' but they do it anyway...why? Because 1) they don't believe their own global warming hysteria (even if they do, there will almost certainly be a net gain in cultivatable land and global carrying capacity) but more to the point 2) they believe importing people into the west means they will tend to have fewer children. I don't believe its to make whites minorities in their own lands by design...thats just a side effect. The trouble is, the kind of immigrants white countries "want" (or at least, dislike least) are already educated, middle class types who probably wouldnt have much more than 2 kids back in Africa/Asia anyway. Those having 4/5/6 kids in Africa/Asia are the underclass who have zero use or value in western societies...and usually bring a mass of problems with them. 

 

Population control is one of those touchy subjects like eugenics though. Everyone agree's with it privately (has a woman ever sought out a fat, bald, retarded and crippled homeless sperm donor?! Of course not. They practice eugenics when seeking out donors) but recoil when official sounding types talk about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Libspero said:

No need..  just free access to contraception and tax incentives for people with small families.  Globally.

Forget the Paris accord..  this is what the world really needs agreement on.

The Chinese had the right idea..  they were just a bit heavy handed about it.

[/Soapbox]

There is no other way to do it than to be fairly heavy handed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.