Jump to content
DOSBODS
  • Welcome to DOSBODS

     

    DOSBODS is free of any advertising.

    Ads are annoying, and - increasingly - advertising companies limit free speech online. DOSBODS Forums are completely free to use. Please create a free account to be able to access all the features of the DOSBODS community. It only takes 20 seconds!

     

IGNORED

Credit deflation and the reflation cycle to come (part 2)


spunko

Recommended Posts

Hows that Coin with a dog doing today,a third off, 70% off from highs.Interesting to see how long it takes to go to down 99.9999%.Do those youngsters buy on margin?,if so i expect a lot will of been cleaned out by these movements down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 34.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

https://news.sky.com/story/government-rules-out-changes-to-pensions-promise-12338187

They will cling on to the status quo until their nails are ripped bleeding from their finger tips.

And they'll hang on with their teeth.

Seriosuly though, I am not up with the ins and outs of the welfare state, and I know in-work benefits attract a lot of scroungers, but aren't pensions a huge underfunded overly promised benefit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Castlevania
7 hours ago, Mapper said:

https://news.sky.com/story/government-rules-out-changes-to-pensions-promise-12338187

They will cling on to the status quo until their nails are ripped bleeding from their finger tips.

And they'll hang on with their teeth.

Seriosuly though, I am not up with the ins and outs of the welfare state, and I know in-work benefits attract a lot of scroungers, but aren't pensions a huge underfunded overly promised benefit?

The above article is relating to the state pension which was never funded. That’s arguably ok at the moment, due to significantly increasing the age that you qualify.

The bigger issue is government defined benefit pensions. Roughly half are funded with the other half simply coming out from general taxation. They completely messed up life expectancy and projected growth rates. They’ve managed to tweak them by changing indexation from RPI to CPI; for younger workers, watering down the pension payouts and increasing the amount current government workers must contribute, but for anyone who’s already drawing or is close to retiring the payouts relative to amount contributed whilst working are fantastic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Castlevania said:

The above article is relating to the state pension which was never funded. That’s arguably ok at the moment, due to significantly increasing the age that you qualify.

The bigger issue is government defined benefit pensions. Roughly half are funded with the other half simply coming out from general taxation. They completely messed up life expectancy and projected growth rates. They’ve managed to tweak them by changing indexation from RPI to CPI; for younger workers, watering down the pension payouts and increasing the amount current government workers must contribute, but for anyone who’s already drawing or is close to retiring the payouts relative to amount contributed whilst working are fantastic.

Huge problem and as you say not a lot they can do once in payment.They have changed to career average that stops the old council trick of promoting your mates 3 years before retiring as the pension was based on the last three years.

The problem is,the government to pay for the above increase council tax,police precept hugely,so thats a double hit on those workers who dont have these lucrative pensions.A large amount of those 25% tax free lump sums seem to end up in BTL as well,then rented out to housing benefit,tax payers then funding even more money to them.

Of course its the main reason they keep pushing back state pension age,so those lower paid private sector workers pensions can sub the government worker retiring at 55 to 60.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Castlevania
11 minutes ago, DurhamBorn said:

Huge problem and as you say not a lot they can do once in payment.They have changed to career average that stops the old council trick of promoting your mates 3 years before retiring as the pension was based on the last three years.

The problem is,the government to pay for the above increase council tax,police precept hugely,so thats a double hit on those workers who dont have these lucrative pensions.A large amount of those 25% tax free lump sums seem to end up in BTL as well,then rented out to housing benefit,tax payers then funding even more money to them.

Of course its the main reason they keep pushing back state pension age,so those lower paid private sector workers pensions can sub the government worker retiring at 55 to 60.

 

The career average is actually pretty good for the less ambitious. It’s all index linked, and given the suppression of real wages since the financial crisis, many people are actually better off. My uncle (a solicitor in local government) was very happy with the reform as it meant his projected pension once retired actually increased.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bobthebuilder

My mate has just had early retirement (health) from the civil service. £100K++ lump sum and £30k per year. Not bad for pushing a pen about, and tbh his health is pretty good as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bobthebuilder
3 minutes ago, Don Coglione said:

How many years of service and at approximately what salary level (if you know)?

Approx 20+ years and salary above the pension amount. Another mate in the same department has more years and was telling me he will get a much higher amount when he stops.

They do know how lucky it is to be fair to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don Coglione
1 minute ago, Bobthebuilder said:

Approx 20+ years and salary above the pension amount. Another mate in the same department has more years and was telling me he will get a much higher amount when he stops.

They do know how lucky it is to be fair to them.

Christ.

My ex has over 30 years of service and I reckon she is on £80k (for doing fuck-all). How much pension is she going to rake?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chewing Grass
2 minutes ago, Don Coglione said:

Christ.

My ex has over 30 years of service and I reckon she is on £80k (for doing fuck-all). How much pension is she going to rake?

At the moment with 30 years in about £27600 p.a.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don Coglione
1 minute ago, Chewing Grass said:

At the moment with 30 years in about £27600 p.a.

How does that square with Bob's anecdote?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bobthebuilder
Just now, Cattle Prod said:

Wow. So how can they get pension access before the private pension age, without being nosy. Is it a police thing, disability or similar, or is this a perk across the civil service?!

Stroke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chewing Grass
Just now, Cattle Prod said:

Wow. So how can they get pension access before the private pension age, without being nosy. Is it a police thing, disability or similar, or is this a perk across the civil service?!

Don't know but I think retired on "I'll health" is how they swing it.

Some government 'pensions' are classed as 'deferred wages'.

Usually you can't get it before 55.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lightscribe

 

38 minutes ago, Don Coglione said:

How many years of service and at approximately what salary level (if you know)?

As I used have dealings in this area, I can chime in here. Classic civil service pension is 1/80th (only one with a lump sum). So with a 40 year service on final salary of £60k would be £30k a year. 

Normally retiring at 55 (classic age is 60) would see it reduced 5% each year taken early. Tier 2 ill health retirement enables you take it unreduced, so in this example he has had 8 years paid for by the tax payer to the tune of £300k at current (lump sum and pension).  Obviously that is index linked so will cost far, far more in years to come.

That’s one of many. Expect Greece levels of pension funding crisis in years to come. Covid will x100 the speed of the demise of people not returning to work and taking ill health retirement. How anybody thought any of this was sustainable when these direct benefit pension schemes were set up is anyone’s guess. 

I have one (on a massively shitter scheme), but am certainly in no illusions that I’ll ever receive it. The economy will have self-imploded long before then. Still at least it was all good for some eh, make hay while the sun shines and all that. Fuck anyone else paying for it or those below. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heart's Ease
11 minutes ago, Lightscribe said:

 

As I used have dealings in this area, I can chime in here. Classic civil service pension is 1/80th (only one with a lump sum). So with a 40 year service on final salary of £60k would be £30k a year. 

Normally retiring at 55 (classic age is 60) would see it reduced 5% each year taken early. Tier 2 ill health retirement enables you take it unreduced, so in this example he has had 8 years paid for by the tax payer to the tune of £300k at current (lump sum and pension).  Obviously that is index linked so will cost far, far more in years to come.

That’s one of many. Expect Greece levels of pension funding crisis in years to come. Covid will x100 the speed of the demise of people not returning to work and taking ill health retirement. How anybody thought any of this was sustainable when these direct benefit pension schemes were set up is anyone’s guess. 

I have one (on a massively shitter scheme), but am certainly in no illusions that I’ll ever receive it. The economy will have self-imploded long before then. Still at least it was all good for some eh, make hay while the sun shines and all that. Fuck anyone else paying for it or those below. 

You'll remember the very short lived 'Premium' CS pension. Contributions significantly increased from the Classic and Classic Plus schemes, but accrual down to 1/60 with no automatic lump sum. Can take from 50 with normal pension age at 60 so a 50% actuarial reduction. Small print got changed a couple of years ago so if taken from 50 there's no inflation increase til 55 (assume CPI and they used to use September data).

Absolutely was used as a tool to keep headline pay increases down. See also granting of additional leave in lieu of pay increase. All kicking the can down the road for the future. 

Knew quite a few going at 53 and having their pensions 'made up' to 60 in lieu of redundancy. It was very good for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bobthebuilder said:

£100K++ lump sum and £30k per year

 

1 hour ago, Bobthebuilder said:

52...

I mean...

What th...

How...

How ar...

...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When i went from GSK the redundancy was crap because it went on age not service,but they offered to increase my years in the final salary pension by 40%.Nuts.At the time i realised just how valuable that would be down the road so left and got 6 free years added on.When i moved into my SIPP last March those extra years ended up being worth £20k each.My partner works at the council,i tell her each years service is worth her putting on 5lb in weight on if i leave her ever or not xD .To be fair her pension might end up £200 a week from them so not massive,but still nice.There is a huge sickness problem though where many have 6 months off every year and nothing done.The pension actually encourages you to do it so you can go on ill health.

I find little wrong in ordinary workers getting £200 a week,what really causes the problems are the none job managers etc pulling £500 a week because that being paid for by pushing low wage workers into poverty through massive council tax.

Lets see what happens once the BOE cant print the welfare budget anymore as we are now in a rising inflation and rate cycle.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yadda yadda yadda
1 hour ago, Bobthebuilder said:

Stroke.

I understand it on that basis. The computer program will say expected default death at 80 or similar. A stroke at 52 will take that expected death age right down. Perhaps they account for less stress from early retirement or perhaps not. They might also account for severity of the stroke.

He could be a winner here and draw down a million at current value. It might go the other way. The scheme is clearly very generous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Yadda yadda yadda said:

I understand it on that basis. The computer program will say expected default death at 80 or similar. A stroke at 52 will take that expected death age right down. Perhaps they account for less stress from early retirement or perhaps not. They might also account for severity of the stroke.

He could be a winner here and draw down a million at current value. It might go the other way. The scheme is clearly very generous.

Thats exactly what i used to get a transfer done.I had cancer 20 years ago,but i didnt say the time,i just said id had cancer and there was a very big risk i wouldnt get any or much value from my pension so i wanted it moved into a personal pension so i could leave it to my kids.IFA was actually quite good as they said you can insure yourself against that risk to leave kids etc,but it meant they wink wink said no,but then insistent client and due to having had cancer it ticked enough boxes for them if the FSA came calling.A few minutes after it landed with them i launched a transfer into my SIPP and they werent very happy at all,they expected the fees at 2.1% a year forever.

The fact government pensions are funded from present tax is the real killer.Copper over the road retired at 50 on big pension paid by the NMW lad in a bedsit working in Lidl warehouse.Its a very difficult thing for governments to tackle though.Re-value DB pensions as being worth 40x instead of 20x and a lower lifetime allowance would do a lot of lifting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ThoughtCriminal

Here's a pension/medical retirement anecdote to get the juices flowing.

 

A few months after i joined the prison service I answered a General Alarm Bell on a different wing. Schizo con had flipped and slashed an officer called Tim who was trying to restrain him. He had a nasty cut on his forehead but nothing too dramatic. 

 

So he went sick (6 months on full pay was the max) but after a few weeks he hadnt come back. Then a few months went by, still no sign. Turns out he said his head had gone, PTSD etc. 

 

So my boss goes out to see him at home for a welfare visit and when he returned him and my colleagues were all laughing because Tim had grown his beard into a mess, was sat in the dark, stank of sweat, house was a tip and he was barely responsive. 


Everyone knew it was bullshit, he'd seized his chance and was going for it.

So end result was he was granted medical retirement. Big lumper and full pension. Was only 43.

 

Id heard officers say "id love to get slashed/stabbed. Nothing too serious, just for 6 months off", but i never actually realised they were serious until then. 

 

I thought "what the fuck job is this? What kind of people fantasise about being wounded to get 6 months off on full pay?". 

 

Anyway, fast forward ten years and im sat on association watching paedophiles playing pool and table tennis for an hour and i heard myself say to my mate" Id love to get thrown off the 3s (top) landing onto the netting. Maybe hurt my back or something". 

 

And thats when i knew i needed to leave. So i did. 

 

I still think about Tim. He moved to Spain, married a girl over there, has his own business. 

 

Alologies for thread derailment, that pension talk triggered a proper trip down memory lane. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

reformed nice guy

I had this in the offtopic post about the tax raid:

Currency debasement will do everything they want to achieve:

    It reduces the relative value of their debts
    If wages rise, even if not as much as inflation, then their tax take rises
    Under reporting CPI and other inflation measures will allow them to devalue state pension payouts, housing benefit, tax credits, minimum wage and universal credit

Is that not the scam they want to pull? In an exaggerated way: Inflation rises 10%, they report it as 5% so bennies and pensions lag behind

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yadda yadda yadda
16 minutes ago, leonardratso said:

tim not so dim after all then.

Might have cut the inmate in on the deal. What was he in for, fraud?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...