Jump to content
DOSBODS
  • Welcome to DOSBODS

     

    DOSBODS is free of any advertising.

    Ads are annoying, and - increasingly - advertising companies limit free speech online. DOSBODS Forums are completely free to use. Please create a free account to be able to access all the features of the DOSBODS community. It only takes 20 seconds!

     

IGNORED

Credit deflation and the reflation cycle to come (part 2)


spunko

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 35.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, feed said:

oh sure, but it's the same as everything else that gets discussed here re energy etc... 

Policy in US/EU etc.. is about protecting the established corporations and businesses whilst Indian/China have the growth driven by population expansion and increase in standard of living.  

So we'll see EV's and a change in business model to protect the Western Auto manufacturers whilst in India/China companies (alone or in partnership) will drive ahead (no pun intended) with local ICE manufacture. 

 

I agree there'll be less ICE cars on the road in 2030 in the WEst than now and that your bit in bold is bang on..I remain unconvinced as to whether UK leccy supply will cope with the change.

For me the wider issue is whether EV's will trump hydrogen cars.

I'm pretty comfortable thinking demand for oil&gas will outstrip supply medium term but then that's my book and I'm talking it9_9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, DurhamBorn said:

You can bank on the fact they do.In fact if you go back to page one of this thread on HPC is was predicted then.It was obvious governments would push massive green investment as a way to get out of a big slump/dis-inflation.My road map on oil and gas has those as cross market drivers that add lubrication to the fiscal pulse the CBs are pumping.

Electric use will grow fast,but the grids needs base load and that will be gas.Asia will need massive amounts.The green sector will cause a bubble,and everyone knows it.The problem they have is the bubble it creates wont be in green energy,it will be in oil and gas companies,the very things everyone has sold.I dont think iv ever seen a better contrarian and macro set up.

Yes I understood the economic requirement and dash for infrastructure spending. I don't think my post was clear. It was more the concern over this year's covid controls and my increasing expectation of more authoritarian government - whether it be left or right leaning - before decade end. I don't want it to happen but if it did I would see it as a practical political solution to prevent the worst excesses of social division/civil war. My fear was a left leaning government might 'engineer' economically and through regulation an 'unfair' environment where the renewables would become dominaant and the oilies would wither away with their business over time effectively transferred to the renewables, ie am I'm not saying oil and gas production would stop. Perhaps this sounds far fetched but there are respected commodity commentators and traders talking about this.                                                                                Very glad DB that your model doesn't allow for this to happen. I also think it useful to debate the forum thesis. I notice this has happened in several other subject areas over past few days and believe the blog is all the better for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Yadda yadda yadda said:

I'm in London and don't own a car because I wouldn't get the use out of it. I am a member of Zipcar and use them on the rare occasions I need to drive. Few people in my street drive to work. Lots do have cars and it is mainly to ferry kids about or to do a weekly shop.

Everybody I know outside London or in the outer suburbs has a car.

I've thought about leaving London and the cost of a car comes into the calculations.

If you need a car five days a week you will own or lease rather than pay as you go. It may be that fewer people need cars, in the West, but it won't be huge proportion. The people I know in their late teens and early 20s, outside London, have cars and need them. It is freedom.

I had a friend who lived in LA ended up selling his car as it was quicker to walk to most local places but rented a car if visiting family outside of LA

Then the other month a friend was talking to me about Zipcar and how his friend works in london but to visit family in the country side they use a zipcar for the weekend now and again

For me working from home i use the car but if im honest its sat outside for 80-90% of the time, my partner can only drive an automatic and i have a manual im sure she would use it more but just for swimming, shopping and family only etc... as she only works 5 minutes walk from the house

So for us we will get a automatic to share but because it will hardly be used just don't know what to get 

I remember VW where testing the subscription model of using a car when needed 

As for the young many of our neighbours kids live in their cars just as i did at that age driving anywhere even to the shops at the bottom of the road like you say its there freedom driving around

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, sancho panza said:

I agree there'll be less ICE cars on the road in 2030 in the WEst than now and that your bit in bold is bang on..I remain unconvinced as to whether UK leccy supply will cope with the change.

For me the wider issue is whether EV's will trump hydrogen cars.

I'm pretty comfortable thinking demand for oil&gas will outstrip supply medium term but then that's my book and I'm talking it9_9

I think a lot of people just can’t see past the end of their nose.  So they look at the local region and think yes oil is done, they can’t comprehend that 2.6 Billion Indians and Chinese want the same standard of living as they have, they can only get it by burning fossil fuels and the only way the state maintain control is by giving them that increase in standard of living.  So oil is only going one way.  

But at the same time, that doesn’t mean they’re wrong locally.  

There is absolutely a change in personal travel taking place in the west and the lock down has brought it forward.  Personally, my car went in March.  I’ll be WFH for a year and if I’m only in the office a day a week when we return, then even now it’s cheaper to hire on the day than it is to own.  Other people are going to start to run the numbers, I expect 2nd cars to go first.  But this is transitional.  

What that will ultimately look like I have no idea. Whether it’s completely disruptive, the Auto manufacturer or traditional public transport.  But Millennials and gen Y, are stay at home generations, that don’t care about ownership.  And this can be seen in the fall in drivers licenses.

US data, but replicated in EU.

Young people are not getting driver’s licenses so much anymore. In fact, no one is. According to a new study by Michael Sivak and Brandon Schoettle at the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, the percentage of people with a driver’s license decreased between 2011 and 2014, across all age groups. For people aged 16 to 44, that percentage has been decreasing steadily  since 1983.

It’s especially pronounced for the teens—in 2014, just 24.5 percent of 16-year-olds had a license, a 47-percent decrease from 1983, when 46.2 percent did. And at the tail end of the teen years, 69 percent of 19-year-olds had licenses in 2014, compared to 87.3 percent in 1983, a 21-percent decrease.

Among young adults, the declines are smaller but still significant—16.4 percent fewer 20-to-24-year-olds had licenses in 2014 than in 1983, 11 percent fewer 25-to-29-year-olds, 10.3 percent fewer 30-to-34-year-olds, and 7.4 percent fewer 35-to-39-year-olds. For people between 40 and 54, the declines were small, less than 5 percent.

and 2014 was prior to the lift sharing companies really taking off.  

Cars are freedom is seen in boomer and Gen X demographics but that move to cars are a hassle the closer you get to younger generations.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm wary of trying to predict the future, except for trends and general forces. As a child, I can recall many of the predictions that never came to pass. Did many predict that owners of capital would hollow out the west by taking production to China? Did they predict that the establishment would allow almost unlimited immigration to drive down wages? Did they predict that the male mortality rate would be decreasing in certain areas due to despair and disillusionment?

No. They predicted utopia and freedom. Never happened.

We all have beliefs, including boris and carrie. Whether Boris believes that he will still be PM post Brexit is another matter.

All I can say is that fossil fuels and nuclear will be essential for the short to medium future. Leaving aside the enormous energy demands of Asia, there simply isn't enough reliable renewable energy now or in the medium term to power the kind of societies we have. That's not only my view, there are muliple energy organisations who provide the in depth research and data to back this view. Even National Grid's woke website lists the fossile fuel sources it regards as necessary now and in the future. As posters have already mentioned, one of the themes of this thread is infrastructure investment. It is greatly needed now and will be essential in the future. It may be partly powered by renewable energy, but the amount and kind of energy needed will mean the bulk will be fossil fuels.

What we will and will not be driving in the future of 2030, evs, hybrid, ice are interesting discussions. But, they are in the path of an oncoming train of high, possibly hyper, inflation, social disorder and possible currency collapse. The kind of forces and impact that generates will bring about unpredicatble things. It may be that the views of posters on this thread come to pass, and its valuable to have contrary voices, but although I admire people for predicting the future, I can't help thinking of David Hunter who is great at predicting macro trends, but on specific timing is terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yadda yadda yadda

As I use Zipcar a bit of info about how it works and the pros and cons as I see them.

Cost is £60 per year plus usage fees.

Fees include fuel.

There are two hire options. Hire by the hour where you pick up or drop off at a set point. Charge by hour with a eight hours maximum daily cost. Or 'flex' where the previous user leaves it in any legal parking space within the zone of operation. This is charged per minute. I've checked my app and there are two parked a three minute walk away available now.

A lot of the fleet is now electric. These are the flex cars that are primarily for short journeys. Not a huge fan as I prefer manual cars.

It is definitely way cheaper than owning if you don't drive regularly. A full day is about as much as hiring a car at Hertz. Much more convenient though. A short trip can be single digit pounds. No need to do maintenance, tax, insurance, etc. You can pay extra for zero excess of you want. There is a card to pay for extra fuel as you're supposed to return the ICE vehicles at least 25% full. You get access to vans also.

Downsides are things like checking the car for damage every time you hire one. I'm a bit paranoid of missing some damage before starting and then getting charged for it later. I wouldn't want to rely on it if I needed to use it even once per week. The cost would soon mount up especially with one mid range journey in two directions spread hours apart. Not suitable for long journeys or going away for a few days.

There are at least two other 'car clubs' operating locally. One is through Enterprise rental and the other has a trendy name that I forget.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, feed said:

I think a lot of people just can’t see past the end of their nose.  So they look at the local region and think yes oil is done, they can’t comprehend that 2.6 Billion Indians and Chinese want the same standard of living as they have, they can only get it by burning fossil fuels and the only way the state maintain control is by giving them that increase in standard of living.  So oil is only going one way.  

But at the same time, that doesn’t mean they’re wrong locally.  

There is absolutely a change in personal travel taking place in the west and the lock down has brought it forward.  Personally, my car went in March.  I’ll be WFH for a year and if I’m only in the office a day a week when we return, then even now it’s cheaper to hire on the day than it is to own.  Other people are going to start to run the numbers, I expect 2nd cars to go first.  But this is transitional.  

What that will ultimately look like I have no idea. Whether it’s completely disruptive, the Auto manufacturer or traditional public transport.  But Millennials and gen Y, are stay at home generations, that don’t care about ownership.  And this can be seen in the fall in drivers licenses.

US data, but replicated in EU.

Young people are not getting driver’s licenses so much anymore. In fact, no one is. According to a new study by Michael Sivak and Brandon Schoettle at the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, the percentage of people with a driver’s license decreased between 2011 and 2014, across all age groups. For people aged 16 to 44, that percentage has been decreasing steadily  since 1983.

It’s especially pronounced for the teens—in 2014, just 24.5 percent of 16-year-olds had a license, a 47-percent decrease from 1983, when 46.2 percent did. And at the tail end of the teen years, 69 percent of 19-year-olds had licenses in 2014, compared to 87.3 percent in 1983, a 21-percent decrease.

Among young adults, the declines are smaller but still significant—16.4 percent fewer 20-to-24-year-olds had licenses in 2014 than in 1983, 11 percent fewer 25-to-29-year-olds, 10.3 percent fewer 30-to-34-year-olds, and 7.4 percent fewer 35-to-39-year-olds. For people between 40 and 54, the declines were small, less than 5 percent.

and 2014 was prior to the lift sharing companies really taking off.  

Cars are freedom is seen in boomer and Gen X demographics but that move to cars are a hassle the closer you get to younger generations.   

Ref bit in bold.I couldn't agree more.We had an excellent discussion a while back on some Art Berman data/arguments where @Cattle Prod put up some charts that showed the direction of travel for Asian oildemand and liek you say,people are obssessing about the US driving season.

There's no other way besides fossil fuels to deliver the growth in standards of livng that Chinese and Indian middle classes want.

As I've said previously,British people(and the West more generally) has lived off the exhorbitant privilege of their currenceis being strong for 50/60 years and they've borrowed up to the hilt to buiild huge welfare states at the same time.My view is that the funding of this has been done mainly by our own pension funds but also at the margins by foriegn buyers-and prices are set at the margins.

When these buyers dissappear(for whatever reason),the charade that is the British economy will change inexoarbly.

And this is where we differ,whislt I can see a lot of office workers working from home more,I think as sterling weakens we will see large scale manufacturing returning to the UK and that will possibly mean demand for cars staying constant

I lvie in leicester.In 1930 Leicester's popultaion was 230,000.Many of whom worked at mills and factories in the cirty and lived within walking distance.As the city's got rougher(no other way to put it),the well off have moved out.

What I'm trying to say here is that to have a decent size reduction in car ussage we need to see more people livng in cities.That is possible but currently the city is degentrifying and therfoere unlikely to draw people back in.

 

I've lifted the next quote from your answer to reply to specifically.

'Cars are freedom is seen in boomer and Gen X demographics but that move to cars are a hassle the closer you get to younger generations.   '

One last point about millenials not having driving lciences particualrly in the USA and that relates to family formation being at record lows ie people not having kids/higher numbers living with parents/huge student debt load inhibiting kids leaving home.Could be the reason behind that move but I havent' stuedied it.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yadda yadda yadda
8 minutes ago, sancho panza said:

Cars are freedom is seen in boomer and Gen X demographics but that move to cars are a hassle the closer you get to younger generations.   

My neighbours, 30-something, bought a car in December. Why? They had a baby in January. Big driver.

A relative of mine got a day out at a race track for her 19th-ish birthday. Lives rural.

The whole lockdown palaver has made me re-evaluate not having a car. It would give more freedom to get away if needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Cattle Prod said:

Big defence spending plans announced this morning, including commitment to Type 32 ships.. Babcock has done well in the last month, are they going to build the Type 32s does anyone know? I think other countries will follow with increased defence spending. Very happy with my holding, BAE still looks expensive though, what do people think?

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/pms-record-defence-pledge-to-protect-scottish-security-and-jobs?utm_source=df432fa0-1e00-4235-8779-f856d4227411&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=govuk-notifications&utm_content=daily

I wish Boris would forget his rocket from Scotland, and buy more ships!

I think we're headed to a period where we'll see increased defence spending as we head into some sort of contuing seismic changes int eh balance of pwoer worldwide over the next 20 years.World war in 20 years?possibly.But it may not involve the West.

Key themes

1) decline of US/NATO global military footprint

2) rise of tensions between new world powers-China/India

3) resurgence of Russia's global military footprint.

I link to an article here that's worht a read.I got it from a friend in that line of work.

Basically,it's all about drones and stopping them wiping out ground forces.But in the end it's all about ground forces dominating the ground.

I also personally think we'll see a resugence in navy spending as we seek to secure supply routes from various threats.

https://capx.co/the-war-in-nagorno-karabakh-has-big-lessons-for-the-british-army/

'The recent war in Nagorno-Karabakh, fought between Armenia and Azerbaijan, may well be an unusually fruitful seminar for the armies of the West. Fought between two semi-modernised, relatively evenly matched forces, a war that featured some remarkable displays of innovative high-tech weaponry ended the old-fashioned way, with the conquest of territory by ground troops. The lessons of this conflict should deeply influence the ongoing Integrated Review of the Army – although a persistent culture of British exceptionalism may yet get in the way.

That Azerbaijan, the richer and much more populous country, should win a war is not surprising. The manner of that victory was more so. The war in Nagorno-Karabakh will be remembered above all for Azerbaijan’s use of unmanned aerial systems [UAS] which gave rise to many of the infamous ‘snuff videos’, broadcasting the destruction of Armenian men and arms to a worldwide audience. UAS played a role in the destruction of well over a hundred Armenian tanks. It may be too early to declare that the age of the tank is over, but the age of the drone is well and truly here.

Without getting too deep into the tactical weeds, this summary illustrates that the holes in the British Army’s current arsenal are very severe indeed: minimal short-range air defence and electronic warfare capabilities – both critical to fight enemy UAS – and no loitering munitions of its own. Much of its artillery is outranged and obsolete, while its malfunctioning reconnaissance drone – Watchkeeper – stars in a charmingly forthright NASA case study of failed public sector technology development.'

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Yadda yadda yadda said:

As I use Zipcar a bit of info about how it works and the pros and cons as I see them.

Cost is £60 per year plus usage fees.

Fees include fuel.

There are two hire options. Hire by the hour where you pick up or drop off at a set point. Charge by hour with a eight hours maximum daily cost. Or 'flex' where the previous user leaves it in any legal parking space within the zone of operation. This is charged per minute. I've checked my app and their are two parked a three minute walk away available now.

A lot of the fleet is now electric. These are the flex cars that are primarily for short journeys. Not a huge fan as I prefer manual cars.

It is definitely way cheaper than owning if you don't drive regularly. A full day is about as much as hiring a car Hertz. Much more convenient though. A short trip can be single digit pounds. No need to do maintenance, tax, insurance, etc. You can pay extra for zero excess of you want. There is a card to pay for extra fuel as you're supposed to return the ICE vehicles at least 25% full. You get access to vans also.

Downsides are thing like checking the car for damage every time you hire one. I'm a bit paranoid of missing some damage before starting and then getting charged for it later. I wouldn't want to rely on it if I needed to use it even once per week. The cost would soon mount up especially with one mid range journey in two directions spread hours apart. Not suitable for long journeys or going away for a few days.

There are at least two other 'car clubs' operating locally. One is through Enterprise rental and the other has a trendy name that I forget.

 

 

 

Rory Sutherland who's a interesting guy works in advertising for Ogivly (Advertising) and has some good views on human behaviour etc...

 

Not wanting to go on about cars to much but he had a friend who wanted to or did get rid of their car but hated the costs of taxis, trains that he would use randomly now and again as i think he lived in London most things were walking distance 

Rory said you need to frame it differently when you see that £20-£30 taxi or train cost come out of your main bank account with all the other day to day crap you just see it as a annoying expense and if i had a car blah blah blah

Set up a separate bank account and everything you spent on owning a car put in there as if you still owned a car  insurance cost, tax, fuel costs, MOT, leasing or finance costs, rough maintenance costs etc...

Now this is your travel account

Now that £30 taxi or train cost that you use now and again doesn't seem that bad when you see how much is going into that account that you would of been spending on owning a car

Probably explained that shit but the point was he was frustrated with travel costs even though it worked out cheaper than owning a car as most of the car costs are paid maybe once a year or month

 

But Rory is a interesting guy lots videos online of him

Whilst different people will need to travel less or more even me for example the car is just sat outside last used 5 days ago to pick up a order i could have got delivered and before that fuck knows

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Chewing Grass said:

This will be your everyday car, it wont need touch screens, self driving or any other fancy gizmos, it will be the 21st century equivalent of a Peugeot 106, will cost about 12K, have a 7 year warranty and will be made in China.

Yes your German SUV will be scrapped and its place on the drive will be taken by two little Chinese EVs with space to spare.

Great analysis, but please don't keep saying this out loud... i don't like it when Germany gets angry!?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, sancho panza said:

Intersting as you can see nicely the trebling in prices up to 2007 and then the plateau to today.This Barnsley,where my Mum is from.Clearly shows prices the same as 2007.Terraced hosues and flats(blue and orange lines) are actually lower than 2007.....

 

 

What you're actually see is the UK banking sector blow itself.

The HPI is a side effect that will rapidly reverse when IR go up.

Its quite amazing, looking at the period from ~1999 to 2007.

Less than 10 years.

A massive sector, around for 150+ years, employing 100ks. No bank run for ~200 years then~80% of the  UK banks and building society involved or propped up by UKGOV.

13 years later the UK is still fucked.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, JMD said:

Great analysis, but please don't keep saying this out loud... i don't like it when Germany gets angry!?!

One of the most protectionist states. Where  

What percentage of GDP is auto industry in Germany?  5%
The auto industry represents 5% of the country's GDP and 820,000 jobs, according to The Financial Times.9 Jan 2020.

That’s spend the last 4 years preventing a ROW – UK - Ireland – EU conduit to ensure there is no mechanism to avoid tariffs, allowing cheap import EV's from China, seems unlikely. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, geordie_lurch said:

Musk demonstrated something like this years ago but it seems they never actually delivered this like a lot of things they demo

 

I'm not saying its all smoke and mirrors, but who believed that there was any jeopardy involved in that 'car test'?, plus I'm pretty sure i did catch sight of David Blaine just off stage in the wings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Cattle Prod said:

A great point, and I know you've said it before, so thanks for the reminder.  Katusa is talking abut current financing conditions projected into the future. Nonsense. To follow up on your point @JMD Katusa is fine, but he is a salesman. And a very good one. I give Eric huge credit for pointing that out afterwards though he is a friend and client of Katusas. You don't hear that kind of integrity often these days.

Yes, i like Eric as he doesn't suffer fools plus he's a real investor (unlike many podcast commentators) so respect his opinions. I also like Katusa, a former maths teacher, he's made loads from commodities, so again i listen to what he says, except for oil where he is obviously dementedly wrong (i hope so anyway)! They bring relevant real world information to the table, unlike people such as Hugh Hendry (who is a self-serving-self-promoting ar*e!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also used to use Zipcar. As soon as kids come along, it ceases to be an option, unless in the interim they've added integrated child seats and rear passenger tablets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, sancho panza said:

 

He lost me at 'my ten point plan'.....the victory of experience over hope.

Yes, Boris Johnson is a liberal wastrel (illegal immigrant amnesties, family steeped in EU causes), Gove et al had their suspicions, and they were right. Didn't Boris once say he wanted to be World King?, probably that's why he's attracted to his Princess nut nuts (environmentalist). Don't get me wrong, their political predilictions don't automatically disqualify them from polite society, but 'conservatives' they aint!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

reformed nice guy
1 hour ago, Yadda yadda yadda said:

My neighbours, 30-something, bought a car in December. Why? They had a baby in January. Big driver.

A relative of mine got a day out at a race track for her 19th-ish birthday. Lives rural.

The whole lockdown palaver has made me re-evaluate not having a car. It would give more freedom to get away if needed.

An effective contraceptive for sensible people is the number of seats in their family car

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, feed said:

oh sure, but it's the same as everything else that gets discussed here re energy etc... 

Policy in US/EU etc.. is about protecting the established corporations and businesses whilst Indian/China have the growth driven by population expansion and increase in standard of living.  

So we'll see EV's and a change in business model to protect the Western Auto manufacturers whilst in India/China companies (alone or in partnership) will drive ahead (no pun intended) with local ICE manufacture. 

But isnt that a bit of a false narrative, directly comparing the East to the West? For example, the West no longer has an increasing or young population. Is it really just about 'Western' cronyism or protectionism? Isn't the real source problem the West is starting to face up to all about having to reinvent its Western economic model? We currently rely on ever growing gdp to sustain our (unpayable) debt. Apparently there is no alternative to monetary collapse to reset things. And Isn't this why that can keeps getting kicked? What economic model we get next will be interesting to learn about, i don't look forward to the next few decades of experimentation... but eventually/ultimately i guess it will simply be a return to a more human scale (Adam Smith) free market system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest threads

×
×
  • Create New...