Jump to content
DOSBODS
  • Welcome to DOSBODS

     

    DOSBODS is free of any advertising.

    Ads are annoying, and - increasingly - advertising companies limit free speech online. DOSBODS Forums are completely free to use. Please create a free account to be able to access all the features of the DOSBODS community. It only takes 20 seconds!

     

IGNORED

Credit deflation and the reflation cycle to come (part 3)


spunko

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 30k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, ONC said:

Interesting letter in the FT today.  Recognising the past Lack of investment in oil/gas, and need for more drilling.  

https://www.ft.com/content/25451156-434a-4c36-96ef-774d99c89688

The last paragraph is great. Translated to plain English, ‘Screw the Ukraine we want a shower!”

985FF3C0-532F-4F51-AF3F-0D0D479B3D1C.jpeg

Hopefully the Ukraine narrative is becoming clearer to many people.

For me, (NATO provocation aside) the decision to condemn Putin for the invasion, perhaps even some humanitarian support for Ukraine….is one thing. We could debate if it was misplaced but it’s fair to say it would be expected and understandable.

However the decision to impose sanctions, target oligarchs, play games with energy was totally, completely and utterly nothing to do with the invasion of Ukraine.

Germany (and the EU) needs to separate that distinction very quickly…try save face ie remove most sanctions whilst keeping up the rhetoric. They would continue to condemn Russia to placate the dumb but Russia will know is just good old political rhetoric.

If not I think there will be a day of reckoning come winter (even if Russia keep some gas flowing). At that point either the EU concedes completely or this escalates to full on US/China or West/BRICS situation that we can speculate the outcome….but where nobody really wins. Hopefully not a kinetic war…but certainly this gets real messy as the economics kick in and citizens start losing money, going hungry and getting cold. 

The more I watch China (Pelosi goading etc) the more I see how patient they are being. Too much at stake to make a rookie error and show their cards, all we are seeing is an occasional nod to Russia across the table….I think they believe the game hasn’t even really started. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

desertorchid
7 minutes ago, Pip321 said:

The more I watch China (Pelosi goading etc) the more I see how patient they are being. Too much at stake to make a rookie error and show their cards, all we are seeing is an occasional nod to Russia across the table….I think they believe the game hasn’t even really started. 

China are always playing the long game, and by that I mean they view themselves as navigating their way to becoming the supreme civilisation over a thousand year time frame. The "West" don't have a scooby against this with their rolling coverage and need for instant gratification/victory. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CannonFodder

China declared in response that any parts sold or used in its supply chain must state 'made in china' on them if they come from taiwan.

American companies such as apple now telling Taiwanese companies to mark their chips and parts as made in china.

The escalation by west on Taiwan is going as well as the sanctions on russia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lightly Toasted
2 hours ago, M S E Refugee said:

This shows you the psychopathic zealotry of the German Greens.

 

Noting the increase in heating costs was not as problematic for people of his income bracket, Kretschmann did admit that some Germans could not make ends meet without government aid. However, he argued that the Covid-19 pandemic has shown the German government will be there for people hit the hardest by the crisis.  

This time there would be some “loss in terms of prosperity,” Kretschmann said. “We all have to adjust to that.”

The green left wants it both ways: "loss of prosperity to save the planet" and "open borders because wir schaffen das". (1) We haven't got enough for ourselves (2) we have unlimited abundance to share.

Two positions that can only be pitched simultaneously by liars and hypocrites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, desertorchid said:

China are always playing the long game, and by that I mean they view themselves as navigating their way to becoming the supreme civilisation over a thousand year time frame. The "West" don't have a scooby against this with their rolling coverage and need for instant gratification/victory. 

You say that, but they fight like rats in a sack as individuals to get money and power.  long term planning my arse.

The British Empire used to plan long term.  We have just forgotten how to.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

M S E Refugee
12 minutes ago, CannonFodder said:

China declared in response that any parts sold or used in its supply chain must state 'made in china' on them if they come from taiwan.

American companies such as apple now telling Taiwanese companies to mark their chips and parts as made in china.

The escalation by west on Taiwan is going as well as the sanctions on russia.

I have always believed that the Democrats are in bed with the Chinese so I wouldn't be suprised if Pelosi's trip was just misdirection by them to look as if they were being tough.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lightly Toasted
2 hours ago, Errol said:

They are still all assuming that Russia will supply them with Gas.

I think this is quite unlikely. At best, Putin will say - 'Yes, we will think about starting supply again - but our thinking will take about a year'.

I think that if Russia felt confident that its security needs are being met, it would resume supply (and the geopolitical picture in Europe would have fundamentally changed, with Germany/EU accepting a degree of Finlandisation).

That's unlikely though, with Finland intent on deFindlandising, the Baltics already in NATO, etc.

I can't see how Russia can stop the wheels that have been set in motion (by the West) simply to meekly return to the status quo ante.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

belfastchild
1 hour ago, Axeman123 said:

 If I was Putin I would sell them as much gas as they could immediately burn, once NS2 was online, but not one BTU for storage.

Id sell them slighly less so they deplete their storage just in time for winter.
But Im like that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Virgil Caine
3 hours ago, Axeman123 said:

I think different. Gas is a double edged sword: it can cause tremendous pain when temporarily withheld from the addict, but an easy and cheap supply is the best way to keep the victim hooked. Think of it like Heroine, where dealers have to give free samles to tempt former addicts that have completed withdrawals back into hell. As a weapon withholding gas is best used in short bursts. If I was Putin I would sell them as much gas as they could immediately burn, once NS2 was online, but not one BTU for storage. Even the will they/won't they about opening NS2 is about even greater supply of cheap gas as a Russian tool to crowd out alternative energy sources and entrench German addiction.

The reason natural gas became popular was because it was a cheap fossil fuel energy resource that provided more energy and produced less carbon than alternatives like coal. If prices stay high too long that first part of the equation goes out of the window. Moreover, now countries have seen it weaponised they are not going to want to be in this position again. Nuclear power and coal are already making a comeback. Coal has the added advantage that it can be used as a feedstock to produce gas itself and in fact was the main source of gas in much of Europe prior to the 1960s. All governments need to do to override the noisy Green lobby is simply to present the alternatives to their populaces in referendums if necessary. I don’t think the results would be in much doubt.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Virgil Caine
18 minutes ago, M S E Refugee said:

Millions could be left without heat and food in winter, London mayor warns https://www.rt.com/news/561209-uk-inflation-khan-london/

Khan wants the Government to step in, as usual he offers no solutions he just wants more money.

First level thinking is really getting out of hand.

In all crises the usual top level official panhandlers such as the Mayor of London and the NHS are the first to put out the begging bowl. It would be naive to expect it to be different this time. I think there is a very high probability that everyone in the U.K. will be without power at sometime this winter no matter how much money is thrown at the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Lightly Toasted said:

All well and good, but do you want failed states on your northern and western borders? B|

 

I wasn't pushing for UK breakup to happen. It's the nationalist political types from Wales and Scotland that want independence referendums etc.

Yes I accept we could end up with failed states on our borders, but I was only commenting that on balance England would be economically better off. Plus I think could also make the argument that England would improve socially and politically - become a more cohesive nation, making more self-interested decisions can only be good thing, especially considering what this thread says lies ahead for us all. 

Actually I don't think Scotland will vote for its independence. But if it did, I think it would be both  hysterical - and sad - the political horse trading over sharing out our joint assets and liabilities. Canada went part way down this track in the 70s - and they had real wealth to divi up - however even they ultimately didn't persue the break up of their country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, ThoughtCriminal said:

Mass immigration, wokeism, multiculturalism, these are all things that can only be indulged by a decadent society on borrowed funds and time.

If anyone thinks Somalis and Pakistanis in the Midlands and london are going to pull together in blitz spirit when the financial shit hits the fan, then I have magic beans to sell.

Everything Kipling wrote was a warning. Gods Of The Copybook Headings could have been written about 2022:

But, though we had plenty of money, there was nothing our money could buy, 
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: "If you don't work you die."  

Then the Gods of the Market tumbled, and their smooth-tongued wizards withdrew
And the hearts of the meanest were humbled and began to believe it was true
That All is not Gold that Glitters, and Two and Two make Four
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings limped up to explain it once morett

It is well worth reading Kipling's 'God's of the copy book headings' poem in full. Theme of losing ancient wisdoms due to pseudo-intellectual neglect, or simply by not practising such things in public for fear of being un-modern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, JMD said:

It is well worth reading Kipling's 'God's of the copy book headings' poem in full. Theme of losing ancient wisdoms due to pseudo-intellectual neglect, or simply by not practising such things in public for fear of being un-modern.

The final verse sums up where we are now-

There are only four things certain since Social Progress began:---
That the Dog returns to his Vomit and the Sow returns to her mire,
And the burnt Fool's bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the Fire;
And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins
When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Virgil Caine said:

Nuclear power and coal are already making a comeback.

If they want to keep the green narrative going they could label it as "green coal" which incorporates CCS (carbon capture and storage)  when they burn it in power stations to generate electricity.  I haven't heard much about CCS recently but found this with a quick google.  Shell are already on the case:

https://www.shell.com/business-customers/catalysts-technologies/licensed-technologies/emissions-standards/tail-gas-treatment-unit/cansolv-co2.html?utm_term=carbon capture technology&utm_campaign=(2.3)+Gas+Processing&utm_source=adwords&utm_medium=ppc&hsa_acc=2377408393&hsa_cam=9229988062&hsa_grp=117369342707&hsa_ad=517905666172&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-306739469995&hsa_kw=carbon capture technology&hsa_mt=p&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_ver=3&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI2v2n3cDV-QIV1OvtCh1KAgNaEAAYASAAEgJSz_D_BwE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Virgil Caine said:

The reason natural gas became popular was because it was a cheap fossil fuel energy resource that provided more energy and produced less carbon than alternatives like coal. If prices stay high too long that first part of the equation goes out of the window. Moreover, now countries have seen it weaponised they are not going to want to be in this position again. Nuclear power and coal are already making a comeback. Coal has the added advantage that it can be used as a feedstock to produce gas itself and in fact was the main source of gas in much of Europe prior to the 1960s. All governments need to do to override the noisy Green lobby is simply to present the alternatives to their populaces in referendums if necessary. I don’t think the results would be in much doubt.  

The cake and eat it green energy option would win. People are stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wherebee said:

You say that, but they fight like rats in a sack as individuals to get money and power.  long term planning my arse.

The British Empire used to plan long term.  We have just forgotten how to.
 

I think that's right about Chinese political infighting. Ive previously commented that Chinese officials, for example ones that 'accompany' foreign press, don't look nearly as engaged or serious compared to the old former USSR types. Seen TV travelogue type programmes where the homes of relatives of high ranking local officials and visited and the adult relatives come across as vacuous and spoilt (by capitalism?). Might seem minor points but shows fragility in the state program perhaps. And the cultural cohesiveness the Chinese parade is a mirage.

The USSR unravelled despite the elaborate system it had built and had enforced for many years. And the reason it fell was rather ironically? down to failing economics (US encouraged of course) and low commodity prices. Anyway gives me hope that China will go the same way one day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CannonFodder
39 minutes ago, JMD said:

I think that's right about Chinese political infighting. Ive previously commented that Chinese officials, for example ones that 'accompany' foreign press, don't look nearly as engaged or serious compared to the old former USSR types. Seen TV travelogue type programmes where the homes of relatives of high ranking local officials and visited and the adult relatives come across as vacuous and spoilt (by capitalism?). Might seem minor points but shows fragility in the state program perhaps. And the cultural cohesiveness the Chinese parade is a mirage.

The USSR unravelled despite the elaborate system it had built and had enforced for many years. And the reason it fell was rather ironically? down to failing economics (US encouraged of course) and low commodity prices. Anyway gives me hope that China will go the same way one day.

Lots of corruption in china but they do execute the corrupt bankers and politicians when they catch them

We dont

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.france24.com/en/asia-pacific/20210129-china-executes-ex-banker-lai-xiaomin-in-corruption-bigamy-case

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-14197485.amp

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Virgil Caine said:

The reason natural gas became popular was because it was a cheap fossil fuel energy resource that provided more energy and produced less carbon than alternatives like coal. If prices stay high too long that first part of the equation goes out of the window. Moreover, now countries have seen it weaponised they are not going to want to be in this position again. Nuclear power and coal are already making a comeback. Coal has the added advantage that it can be used as a feedstock to produce gas itself and in fact was the main source of gas in much of Europe prior to the 1960s. All governments need to do to override the noisy Green lobby is simply to present the alternatives to their populaces in referendums if necessary. I don’t think the results would be in much doubt.  

I know it will never happen but I'd love to see the UK government decide to reopen coal mining and to put Drakeford in the position of choosing between green policies and Welsh jobs. I wonder what would happen to the Welsh labour vote. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chewing Grass
5 minutes ago, M S E Refugee said:

The hospitality industry want the Government to cut energy prices.

Energy crisis threatens British nightlife https://www.rt.com/business/561216-uk-nightclubs-closing-energy-costs/

I think the UK Government has effectively collapsed and can't cope with the number of variables and balls that need juggling.

It will be everyone for themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Chewing Grass said:

I think the UK Government has effectively collapsed and can't cope with the number of variables and balls that need juggling.

It will be everyone for themselves.

Truss needs to come out swinging as soon as she is crowned, dithering until the New Year would be unrecoverable. We need tax cuts, public spending cuts, and interest rate rises ASAP.

As much as I like her "police should police the streets not tweets" soundbite, it does have a worrying air of distraction to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...