Jump to content
DOSBODS
  • Welcome to DOSBODS

     

    DOSBODS is free of any advertising.

    Ads are annoying, and - increasingly - advertising companies limit free speech online. DOSBODS Forums are completely free to use. Please create a free account to be able to access all the features of the DOSBODS community. It only takes 20 seconds!

     

IGNORED

Credit deflation and the reflation cycle to come (part 2)


spunko

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, sancho panza said:

 

Thanks for these informative posts MS with all the subtle nuances of the market.If I'd had time to read them earlier today,I'd have replied with my questions rather try and answer CP.

Whilst I get what you're driving at,it's interesting to see that you also don't know if things ill hold up ina BK .I think @Castlevania has hit the nail on the head with regards to bank solvency.I don't know if you can remember psots covering a research piece by Prof Kevin Dowd and Dean Buckner on the solvency of the UK banks in a psot covid world.It didn't inspire confidence.

The paper's here;summed up in short by the graphic.Dowd measures solvency using market cap/total assets rather than the array of 'risk weighted' measures the CB's prefer.

https://iea.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/How-reslient-are-UK-banks-3.pdf

image.png.f0b93b085b8279b82957c1a4a10caf35.png

 

I have some questions I'd love to know the answer to if you have time.

1) Gvien the dominance of the big banks and the fact that they're the main players,doesn't their solvency effectively underpin the solvency of the CCP.Say the LCH is at the centre of a default problem and given they trade an disproportionately large amount of derviatives given the size of the country,then the implicit gurantee of the BoE is effectively being called on to bail out players that they don't necessarily have a huge amount of insight into.Hence could we possibly see a large player like Deutsche build up risk out of sight of UK regulators?

Also,with reference to this,big banks use the IRB approach  to risk weighting which is based on their own data(unlike the standardized approach used by smaller banks),isn't their a risk that the oversight that the regulators think they have isn't the oversight they actually have.

2) I'd presume the swaps market is less volatile than say equity options markets,are the margin rates different between those two markets and aslo do they vary margin rates depending on the quality of the the cashflows that are being swapped?

3) Roughly what are the margin rates? I do wonder how they'd cope in a systemic event if there's only been 25% posted say.

3) What sort of collateral is allowed to be used?Is it mainly govt bonds and cash for say swaps trade or does the CCP hold the the two sources of cashflows allowing the cashflows to be swapped? If they are allowed to psot other collateral,can they use collateral that's been used elsewhere ie rehypothecated?

4) WIth reference to CDS issuers,is it possible for a parent group,say Deutsche Bank to unwittingly own the CDS issuer as well as the company purcahsing the CDS.I've read variously that the purchase of CDS/other hedging mechanisms allows companies to carry underperforming loans at par even if they're underperforming?

 

Appreciate the posts MS.Learned a lot from thsoe.

It's getting late but I'll answer the easier ones first and the rest tomorrow. I don't have all the answers to your questions but I'll answer those I can.

The first thing to bear in mind is that in terms of risk, the CCP is the only counterparty to say Deutsche even though Deutsche in reality is trading with all other market participants who also clear when initiating the trade. The CCP exists to shift Deutsche's counterparty risk to and from other participants entirely under the silo of the CCP. Hence my concentration of risk comment earlier and why CCP's are deemed to be SIFI's.

1) In essence yes the solvency of the CCP is dependant on the solvency of the entire market of participants. However they weren't created to deal with the scenario of the entire banking sector becoming insolvent but rather to mitigate against a large market participant failing and triggering and transmitting a cascade effect a la Lehman's 2008. If Deutsche wants to trade, it has to clear and currently LCH is the preferred venue for European based banks. When clearing first started the larger dealer banks would quote the price as 'LCH clear only'. There were a few smaller European banks that wanted to clear Eurex but soon found themselves shut out of the majority of the market as they could only trade with the few other banks that insisted on Eurex. Needless to say all these banks eventually had to fold and clear LCH if they wanted to trade with anyone. So it is not possible for a Deutsche to build up risk positions outside the purview of the UK regulator at least for the trades it is clearing in Europe.

I can't speak to the specifics of IRB but I do know that the banks are incentivised to clear by being deemed to have set aside sufficient capital via initial and variation margin at the CCP for clearing the trade in the first place. The fact that they are mandated by law to clear anyway is neither here or there!

2) Yes different initial margins and variation margins have to be posted depending on the instrument being traded. Interest rate derivatives are certainly less volatile than some of the exotic options. It's not about 'quality of the cashflows' but rather the inherent volatility of the instrument being traded. Bear in mind a big benefit of managing this risk for the regulator and the CCP is the netting of positions so Deutsche for simplicity's sake could be long 5bn with CCP and short 4bn with CCP so margin will be based on their net 1bn position with CCP. This was another reason the bigger dealers forced everyone else to LCH as they wouldn't benefit as much from netting if their trades were cleared at 3 different CCP's for example. It may have changed (I doubt it) but there was no cross netting allowed from CCP to CCP when I last worked.

3) I left the market 5 years ago so can't remember precise percentages by instrument but will look it up if I can find it published else I can always ask some of my old chums still in the market.

3) The market participants pay the cashflows they would have paid to their counterparty to the CCP and receive the cashflows from the CCP they would have received from their counterparty. These are just the inherent cashflows of the trade and are not considered collateral. They can post cash as collateral for initial and variation margin but primarily post sovereign govt bonds with a de minimis rating of (I can't remember the exact rating and of course this could have changed since I left) but I'm quite confident they would have to be at least a single A rating. Your question about rehypothecation is actually a very good one and not one I thought of before and don't know the answer to. But I would imagine it would be pointless to construct such market infrastructure and not address this potential issue from the perspective of the market regulator given it depends to a great extent on the ability to use the collateral to settle the default process. I will have to look into this for a proper answer but I would guess there is some mechanism under the terms of the CCP that the collateral 'belongs' to the CCP as it bears the risk and tough shit to any financial entity that lent it to the defaulting member of the CCP. They are compensated for this risk by the interest (repo) rate they receive for lending the bond out in the first place.

4) It definitely is possible and definitely does happen if you are looking at it from a parent group point of view. Take Deutsche for example. Deutsche London legal entity can write a CDS on say GE while at the same time Deutsche Frankfurt legal entity can purchase the same CDS from Deutsche London or any other market participant for that matter. Whether it is unwitting or witting I would argue it's possible at the group level they don't know what each legal entity is getting up to on a day to day individual trade basis as the scenario outlined above but then it doesn't really matter from the group perspective as even in a default the cash flows would remain within the group. That is not to say the risk management function at group level is not looking at these at all (they are) but they are not vetoing or approving trades on a trade by trade basis between legal entities on a daily basis. It was rare but occasionally Deutsche London would trade a swap with Deutsche Frankfurt through us even though they could go direct and avoid our brokerage fee.

As for loans, it depends what you mean by loans. There are Loan Credit Default Swaps but these only apply to syndicated secured loans and not typical loans made from a bank to a corporate entity. Plain vanilla CDS either reference a govt or corporate bond as the instrument protection (insurance) which has been written on.

That's all I can answer for tonight but will come back on what I couldn't answer eventually when I get the chance to pick my old friend's brains who are still working in this market on some of these details.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 35.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Fully Detached
10 hours ago, DurhamBorn said:

I tend to use percentages.So say you wanted to start buying Bp and its say £3.15 and you have £5000 for the stock,you could set 5 ladders of £1000 at 8% fall points,so £3.15,£2.90,£2.64.£2.42,£2.22.If Bp only hit £2.50 you would end up with £3000 at an average of £2.89.

Ladders remove emotion from buying.You can also remove ladders if the stock moves ahead and re-deploy in other areas.

I used them to position as i turned my portfolio around,though last March i was lucky in that i managed to buy several ladders together because the markets fell that quickly.

Ah super thanks DB! Really appreciate that - my search showed 12 pages of references in this thread alone but none of them really made sense without the underlying explanation - cheers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

8 hours ago, sancho panza said:

Very much as per what @Castlevaniawas saying about banks balance sheets being backward looking by necessity.I think what worries me-and I say that as someone who sees a BK type deflationary event as an inevitable prelude to a reflation-is that using reasonable metrics provided by Kevin Dowd,it doesn't seem as if British Banks learned their lesson from 2008.

But then why would they?I remember reading WIlliam White some years back saying the best way to regulate banks was to let one go bust once in a while.

It's going to be interesting tosee what failsafes work and which ones don't come a BK type deflationary wave and where the defaults cause the msot damage.As CV says bad loans are probably going to be the precursor for some wider derivative event,personaly,I think CRE will eb the epeicentre thsi time but there's still an epic bubble in resi too.

They have done relatively well over the past year, the turbulence was far worse than 2008 IMO, with not much to show for it. That is probably helped by governments learning from the past and acting fast, as well as anything else put in place.  The data on bank leverage reminds me of the pandemic stats, if you mess with statistics enough you can get the result you want!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Lightscribe said:

https://inews.co.uk/inews-lifestyle/money/habitos-40-year-fixed-rate-mortgage-is-a-game-changer-for-borrowers-heading-for-retirement-904925
 

What’s the betting this mortgage lender goes bust in the next few years?

Re-mortgage, put it all in gold/silver and crypto? :)

jesus.  20 year at 2.99.  if that was available here in Oz I would be remortgaging up to 75% (I have no mortgage) and using that seed capital for stuff.  That's lifechanging stuff right there.

Joe and others who have been thinking about buying - that's an offer that you won't see again in your lifetime, in my personal view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

M S E Refugee

I was going to stop putting as much money in my Sipp as I have most of my Pension in the Royal Mail scheme and I don't want to go over the £12500 tax threshold when I hopefully retire in 6 years time.

My strategy going forward was to put as much as possible into a Stocks and Shares ISA.

These are the investments that are in the RM pension, Is there a good chance that my pension will get reduced owing to their current investment strategy?

(%)

 Equities (listed and private) 0-40

Property 0-30

High yield credit 0-30

Private debt (incl. property-linked debt) 0-30

Absolute return (including Diversified Growth/MultiAsset Funds) 0-100 Investment grade credit

0-50 Emerging market debt Other

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, M S E Refugee said:

I was going to stop putting as much money in my Sipp as I have most of my Pension in the Royal Mail scheme and I don't want to go over the £12500 tax threshold when I hopefully retire in 6 years time.

My strategy going forward was to put as much as possible into a Stocks and Shares ISA.

These are the investments that are in the RM pension, Is there a good chance that my pension will get reduced owing to their current investment strategy?

(%)

 Equities (listed and private) 0-40

Property 0-30

High yield credit 0-30

Private debt (incl. property-linked debt) 0-30

Absolute return (including Diversified Growth/MultiAsset Funds) 0-100 Investment grade credit

0-50 Emerging market debt Other

You could always open a separate SIPP yourself and save in there and get the extra tax relief,if its final salary there is no way it will be reduced,the only small risk is if they went bust and it went into pension protection and thats just a 10% cut.

Iv got a similar aim as you.I intend to take £16,600 in lump sums from 55 to 67,tax allowance and the 25% tax free,then a month before my state pension starts go into full drawdown and take the full 25% lump sum out.Once my state pension kicks in il only take £3k a year from my pension so still at the tax allowance,and then use my ISAs for extra income.My pension from that stage will mostly be for inheritance tax avoidance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That 20 year fix looks very tempting.  What are peoples thoughts on early repayments? 

I remember a few mentions previously of TSBs 10year fix which came in 2 forms.  One of which had the option to pay it off after 5 years with no early repayment charge but had a slightly higher interest rate.  I looked into that option, but with mortgage rates slightly over 2% I thought why would I?  Inflation / equity returns will almost certainly be higher than that, so I couldn't see the advantage in the early repayment option given that it comes with a higher interest rate.

Is there anything wrong with stretching out the payments as long as possible? Am I missing something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chewing Grass

A fix is a fix as long as it is cast in stone with no way out for the lender, if you want cast-iron certainty at uber low rates now is probably as low as you will ever get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

M S E Refugee
14 minutes ago, DurhamBorn said:

You could always open a separate SIPP yourself and save in there and get the extra tax relief,if its final salary there is no way it will be reduced,the only small risk is if they went bust and it went into pension protection and thats just a 10% cut.

Iv got a similar aim as you.I intend to take £16,600 in lump sums from 55 to 67,tax allowance and the 25% tax free,then a month before my state pension starts go into full drawdown and take the full 25% lump sum out.Once my state pension kicks in il only take £3k a year from my pension so still at the tax allowance,and then use my ISAs for extra income.My pension from that stage will mostly be for inheritance tax avoidance.

I have 17.5 years in the final salary then another 9 in a defined benefit scheme.

We start yet another scheme in the next year or so.

Many thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chewing Grass said:

A fix is a fix as long as it is cast in stone with no way out for the lender, if you want cast-iron certainty at uber low rates now is probably as low as you will ever get.

I got my kids onto the TSB 10 year fix and a very cheap 5 year with the Halifax.The 5 year was because they have got the mortgage down to £48k and are happy just to chip £4k a year plus the repayment off it now.They should have a £20k mortgage by the time they are 32 on a nice house.

My son is only 21,partner 23,they owe about £100k on £130k nice house,they got the 10 year from TSB,im quietly nudging them all the time to chip it away and they have the first £3k to pay off now.Id be quite happy if they manage a £4k a year over payment as they are paying off £2.5k capital on the repayment anyway.My son also had about £27k of silver and its worth over £40k now.The idea was to sell it once it equals the mortgage left and pay it off.His partner is a teacher,and he works for Aldi so about as secure as you can get for jobs.

Its taken me nudging though for them to understand that these rates arent normal and that 6% mortgage rates would see their mortgage really jump.You can see why most young people who dont have the kind of advice we on this thread understand can get themselves in lifelong debt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you gift your son the silver or did he purchase it on his own?

I kind of wish I had this kind of financial education at the same age, I was blowing money on all types of rubbish at the time. 

I don't know why it never occurred to me, at a young age my own thoughts were that everything would sort itself out in the end and everyone rises to senior level raking in six figures. Unfortunately life is unfair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don Coglione
Just now, Cattle Prod said:

Same here. I don't know about you, but I thought I was immortal when I was 21, and no one told me otherwise!

Bit of an existential tangent, but is that necessarily a bad thing? Settling down at 20 years old isn't for everyone; if the wheels come off (not a slight on your son, DB!) then the plan can unravel very quickly. For some, at that age, it is better not to have a plan and simply go with the flow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lightscribe
1 hour ago, Boon said:

Did you gift your son the silver or did he purchase it on his own?

I kind of wish I had this kind of financial education at the same age, I was blowing money on all types of rubbish at the time. 

I don't know why it never occurred to me, at a young age my own thoughts were that everything would sort itself out in the end and everyone rises to senior level raking in six figures. Unfortunately life is unfair.

Unfortunately would of completely ignored any such advice from teens even up to my late twenties with a lot of capital in my pocket from selling my house I had at the time.

I only had one focus. And it was with the wrong head.


 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Lightscribe said:

Unfortunately would of completely ignored any such advice from teens even up to my late twenties with a lot of capital in my pocket from selling my house I had at the time.

I only had one focus. And it was with the wrong head.


 

 

I remember when i was 17 speaking to someone a couple of years older who was going on about his pension and how much money he is putting away in it. I presumed he had something wrong with him for not spending every penny of his earning by Sunday night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talking Monkey
1 hour ago, Cattle Prod said:

Same here. I don't know about you, but I thought I was immortal when I was 21, and no one told me otherwise!

Yeah but at 21 as a bloke it's basically our job to think we're immortal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I pissed away several 10s of thousand in my early 20s. Wouldn't change it. Had a great life and loads of experiences. Always worked hard but got a lot of things out of my system at the same time.

A lot of people who have "followed the plan" and been financially responsible forever never get the chance to blow off steam and this can often lead to them having a bit of a wobble early 30s or even 40s and try to claw back the life they could have lived.

Still, I don't own a house. Depends what your priorities are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ThoughtCriminal

Youth is wasted on the young. Truth. 

 

Let's face it, we all have the brains of a rocking horse at 21.

 

I was working the doors, up to my neck in debt, all the women I could handle and thought I was king of the world. 

 

I shudder now at the attitude I had to money back then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BAT Share price  at £26 looks tempting -are people still holding stock for Dividend income ? 

Not bought any yet but looks a good price to buy 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...