Jump to content
DOSBODS
  • Welcome to DOSBODS

     

    DOSBODS is free of any advertising.

    Ads are annoying, and - increasingly - advertising companies limit free speech online. DOSBODS Forums are completely free to use. Please create a free account to be able to access all the features of the DOSBODS community. It only takes 20 seconds!

     

IGNORED

Credit deflation and the reflation cycle to come (part 9)


spunko

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Starsend said:

image.gif.114781431fbcdf78eb475859ec9971e2.gif

Some of the techs are warning to be cautious.  I'd explain but.....!

1 hour ago, Errol said:

Gold going mental again.

Surely ya mean silver!

  • Agree 5
  • Cheers 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So £22,070 income per annum tax free in 2024/25, plus all the tax free stuff like some NS&I, gilts gains, Britannias, ISA withdrawals, some benefits, rent a room (to £7,500), and VCTs and the like?......

£12,570 Personal allowance (e.g. pension)

£500 Dividend allowance

£5,000 Starting rate for savings (reduced pro rata if you "earn" more than your personal allowance)

£3,000 CGT allowance (could just be a (e.g. money market) accumulation fund?)

The Starting rate for savings includes:

. Bank and building society accounts

. Savings and credit union accounts

. Unit trusts (>60% rule)

. Investment trusts (>60% rule)

. Open-ended investment companies (>60% rule)

. Peer-to-peer lending

. Trust funds

. Payment protection insurance (PPI)

. Government or company bonds

. Life annuity payments (the declared capital element is free of tax)

. Some life insurance contracts

60% rule is fund must have over 60% market value in cash or bonds

Correct?  Anything else?

Edited by Harley
  • Informative 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Onsamui
7 hours ago, wherebee said:

that's also wrong - she's got it 100% wrong.  He could have said 'I'm going to spend it on a huge butt plug this weekend' and she'd have to accept it.

Told you on here before I've trained the wife to say 'because we think the bank is going to collapse' when asked when she'd taking out large amounts of cash.  Always gets they to hurry up, the louder she is.

OH has just done another investment and the form filling is getting ridiculous and the questions byond personal.  He was really screaming at the computer! 

  • Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

M S E Refugee
59 minutes ago, Alex said:

More people should read their banks T&Cs before handing over money to them. Banks don't hold "your" money for you. You become a creditor of the bank when you deposit funds. Much weaker position.

Even when presented with the evidence they still wouldn't believe you.

  • Agree 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Royston
22 hours ago, HousePriceMania said:

 

If the actual BK comes along soon ( and many people suspect it will ) then I'll fill my boots again.

 

I thought the fabled "BK" is supposed to be a stock market collapse and subsequent economic depression on a par with 1929?

Didn't it take stocks over 20 years to recover back to their post 1929 levels? 

How long are you planning on living?

  • Agree 1
  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lightscribe

Hat tip to @kibuc

Disclosure- I went in at 5p ;)

If gold is in a bull run and at ATHs you can be sure there’s an incentive by all parties to get back to mining :)

Edited by Lightscribe
  • Agree 2
  • Cheers 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ThoughtCriminal

So Israel have said they are definitely going to strike Iran, and Iran have said if they do they'll definitely retaliate on a massive scale, and this time with no warning.

Gold and oil to the moon? Anything else in this scenario?

  • Agree 1
  • Informative 3
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Lightscribe said:


In October of last year (when the stand out gold miners like Harmony and Eldorado were at their lowest then started to run) Tavi was one of the few economists calling for it.

Even the Dosbodderati had little faith that gold would defy UST correlation and that it would only go up on interest rate cuts. Stagflation, which is what I’ve always been banging on about was the true game changer.

Some get it.

IMG_6558.thumb.jpeg.91988072a1616a823d1a2ab5e32adf18.jpeg

IMG_6559.thumb.jpeg.215508a5e6edc9d32921b4bf29ce9ac2.jpeg

I’m confused with all this gold talk….

As I understand it the US has printed something like 80% of all dollars in existence in the last 4 years or so, so that means there are more dollars.

Now I imagine in order to do this they must have mined an extra 80% of gold over the same period into existence in order to support this money being printed. I mean money is backed by gold…surely?

I know Nixon temporarily removed the gold standard in 1971 but that was just temporary right?

It’s a mad world….money backed with nothing. Not long now and everyone will be millionaires  

It would be really interesting to look at the true quantity of fiat floating around verses the quantity of real things (be it gold, cars, clothes, wheat, labour, cocoa beans etc etc). That may start to show the true level of potential ‘inflation’ or rather ‘devaluation of currency’.

Interesting times….and every royal headline, political farce or wokey annoying topic I see in the news I see as just something trying to distract me from what is really going on.

  • Agree 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

HousePriceMania
57 minutes ago, Royston said:

I thought the fabled "BK" is supposed to be a stock market collapse and subsequent economic depression on a par with 1929?

Didn't it take stocks over 20 years to recover back to their post 1929 levels? 

How long are you planning on living?

Not including dividends, recovered much quicker.

If you think buying shares at the bottom of the 1929 stock market crash was bad, imagine buying them the month before the crash.

  • Agree 5
  • Vomit 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, HousePriceMania said:

Not including dividends, recovered much quicker.

If you think buying shares at the bottom of the 1929 stock market crash was bad, imagine buying them the month before the crash.

That’s the point.

Ignoring what will happen and the ‘time in and timing markets’ etc (all relevant) but once/if the BK happens then the game changes.

So (assuming BK arrives) at the lower values the stock market offers something else…it may not rise for 20 years and indeed it may fall further but it offers (depending on sectors, companies etc) a ability buy into assets to hold/store wealth at a cheaper value.

So BP @£2 or BT @40p or BAT @£10, Rio @ £30 etc etc. The dial has turned and as long as you pick well and spread a little you are buying assets….whether ‘assets’ then crumble further is another matter but you are relatively wealthier than your old self  who nearly bought 2 months earlier because now you bought 2 for 1.

Its really then about buying shares as an asset rather than an investment 

Of course in a true crash incomes alter, cash flows matter, dividends change etc etc but it’s more then about having improved you position as best you can….because if you don’t buy at the bottom (near bottom) you possibly never will.

But like the Guinness advert….waiting for the BK requires patience and missing out in lots of decent waves in the meantime. So playing in the water first is good too😉

Edited by Pip321
  • Informative 3
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

HousePriceMania
13 minutes ago, Pip321 said:

That’s the point.

Ignoring what will happen and the ‘time in and timing markets’ etc (all relevant) but once/if the BK happens then the game changes.

So (assuming BK arrives) at the lower values the stock market offers something else…it may not rise for 20 years and indeed it may fall further but it offers (depending on sectors, companies etc) a ability buy into assets to hold/store wealth at a cheaper value.

So BP @£2 or BT @40p or BAT @£10, Rio @ £30 etc etc. The dial has turned and as long as you pick well and spread a little you are buying assets….whether ‘assets’ then crumble further is another matter but you are relatively wealthier than your old self  who nearly bought 2 months earlier because now you bought 2 for 1.

Its really then about buying shares as an asset rather than an investment 

Of course in a true crash incomes alter, cash flows matter, dividends change etc etc but it’s more then about having improved you position as best you can….because if you don’t buy at the bottom (near bottom) you possibly never will.

But like the Guinness advert….waiting for the BK requires patience and missing out in lots of decent waves in the meantime. So playing in the water first is good too😉

If you bought at the peak and got dividends, then the recovery took much much longer.

That's the point.

You buy at the wrong time, you lose.  If your circumstances change and you need to liquidate at the wrong time, you **** yourself.

  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   10 members

    • Majorpain
    • decnet
    • Noallegiance
    • Joxer
    • JimmyTheBruce
    • SpectrumFX
    • THE SOUP DRAGON
    • RupertT
    • Agent ZigZag
    • DownwardSpiral
×
×
  • Create New...